Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Quimby, 419 So. 2d 951.

129 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Solomon Burke Guillory, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    the supreme court declared: When tangible objects are sought to be excluded from evidence on the basis of an unconstitutional search or seizure, a defendant must timely file a motion to suppress such evidence.
  • State of Louisiana v. Trevonte Lamarque Talbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Russell Wade Cole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    Notwithstanding, our supreme court stated: This does not mean that disparity in sentences of co- defendants with similar backgrounds, charged with similar participation in identical crimes may not be considered as a factor in determining whether a sent
  • State v. Cole 265 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    Notwithstanding, in State v. Quimby , , 962 (La.1982), our supreme court stated: This does not mean that disparity in sentences of co-defendants with similar backgrounds, charged with similar participation in identical crimes may not be considered as a factor in determining whether a sentence is excessive and out of proportion to the severity of a crime.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Leo Paul Thibodeaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Thibodeaux 216 So. 3d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
  • State v. Lee 208 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Quincy McKinnies, Jr. 171 So. 3d 861 La. 2014
  • State v. Harris 151 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Briley 151 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Weathersby 140 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Coleman 133 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Martin 131 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “The decision on a motion for new trial rests within the sound discretion of the trial judge and his ruling will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of a clear showing of abuse of discretion.”
  • State v. Thomas 131 So. 3d 84 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Brisban, 2000-3437 (La.2/26/02)
  • State v. Sholar 136 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    and points out that an incongruity in sentences between co-defendants charged with similar crimes arising out of the same factual scenario should be considered.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamario Kato La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    Notwithstanding, our supreme court stated: This does not mean that disparity in sentences of co-defendants with similar backgrounds, charged with similar participation in identical crimes may not be considered as a factor in determining whether a sentence
  • State v. Kato 157 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Notwithstanding, our supreme court stated: This does not mean that disparity in sentences of co-defendants with similar backgrounds, charged with similar participation in identical crimes may not be considered as a factor in determining whether a sentence is excessive and out of proportion to the severity of a crime.
  • State v. Tatten 116 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hogan 113 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Savoy, 2011-1174 (La.7/2/12), ; State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.
  • State v. Womack 109 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Henry 103 So. 3d 424 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Smith 96 So. 3d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Everett 96 So. 3d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Robinson 87 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
    2 Cir.1984), writ denied, -83 (La.1983)
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth K. Prejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Notwithstanding, our supreme court stated: This does not mean that disparity in sentences of co-defendants with similar backgrounds, charged with similar participation in identical crimes may not be considered as a factor in determining whether a sentence is excessive and out of prop
  • State v. Prejean 50 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Notwithstanding, our supreme court stated: This does not mean that disparity in sentences of co-defendants with similar backgrounds, charged with similar participation in identical crimes may not be considered as a factor in determining whether a sentence is excessive and out of proportion to the severity of a crime.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Thomas 48 So. 3d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Explained State v. Vallier 34 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Explained State of Louisiana v. Carey Vallier, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Johnson 33 So. 3d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Howard 13 So. 3d 729 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.2d Cir.05/13/98), , unit denied, 1998-1778 (La.11/06/98), .
  • State v. Howard 987 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.
  • State v. Morris 982 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Jackson, 30,-473 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/98), .
  • State v. Birch 979 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.
  • State v. Robbins 979 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, supra ; State v. Nugent, supra .
  • State v. Smith 967 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Nugent, supra .
  • Explained State v. Coleman 959 So. 2d 465 La. 2007
  • State v. McNeil 961 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Christaw, supra .
  • State v. Christaw 945 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/98), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/6/98), .
  • State v. Nugent 938 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/98), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/6/98), .
  • State v. Hano 938 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Gatti 914 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.
  • State v. Douglas 888 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.2d Cir.05/13/98), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/06/98), .
  • State v. Gipson 850 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    See, State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/98), .
  • State v. Dixon 852 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Page 837 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Francois, supra .
  • State v. Floyd 830 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002