Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Quimby, 419 So. 2d 951.
-
State of Louisiana v. Solomon Burke Guillory, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
the supreme court declared: When tangible objects are sought to be excluded from evidence on the basis of an unconstitutional search or seizure, a defendant must timely file a motion to suppress such evidence.
- State of Louisiana v. Trevonte Lamarque Talbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
-
State of Louisiana v. Russell Wade Cole
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Notwithstanding, our supreme court stated: This does not mean that disparity in sentences of co- defendants with similar backgrounds, charged with similar participation in identical crimes may not be considered as a factor in determining whether a sent
-
State v. Cole
265 So. 3d 1051
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Notwithstanding, in State v. Quimby , , 962 (La.1982), our supreme court stated: This does not mean that disparity in sentences of co-defendants with similar backgrounds, charged with similar participation in identical crimes may not be considered as a factor in determining whether a sentence is excessive and out of proportion to the severity of a crime.
- State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
- State of Louisiana v. Leo Paul Thibodeaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- State v. Thibodeaux 216 So. 3d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
- State v. Lee 208 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
- State of Louisiana v. Quincy McKinnies, Jr. 171 So. 3d 861 La. 2014
- State v. Harris 151 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Briley 151 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Weathersby 140 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Coleman 133 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
State v. Martin
131 So. 3d 121
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“The decision on a motion for new trial rests within the sound discretion of the trial judge and his ruling will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of a clear showing of abuse of discretion.”
-
State v. Thomas
131 So. 3d 84
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Brisban, 2000-3437 (La.2/26/02)
-
State v. Sholar
136 So. 3d 1
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
and points out that an incongruity in sentences between co-defendants charged with similar crimes arising out of the same factual scenario should be considered.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jamario Kato
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Notwithstanding, our supreme court stated: This does not mean that disparity in sentences of co-defendants with similar backgrounds, charged with similar participation in identical crimes may not be considered as a factor in determining whether a sentence
-
State v. Kato
157 So. 3d 695
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Notwithstanding, our supreme court stated: This does not mean that disparity in sentences of co-defendants with similar backgrounds, charged with similar participation in identical crimes may not be considered as a factor in determining whether a sentence is excessive and out of proportion to the severity of a crime.
- State v. Tatten 116 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-
State v. Hogan
113 So. 3d 1195
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Savoy, 2011-1174 (La.7/2/12), ; State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.
- State v. Womack 109 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
- State v. Henry 103 So. 3d 424 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
- State v. Smith 96 So. 3d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- State v. Everett 96 So. 3d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-
State v. Robinson
87 So. 3d 881
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
2 Cir.1984), writ denied, -83 (La.1983)
-
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth K. Prejean
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Notwithstanding, our supreme court stated: This does not mean that disparity in sentences of co-defendants with similar backgrounds, charged with similar participation in identical crimes may not be considered as a factor in determining whether a sentence is excessive and out of prop
-
State v. Prejean
50 So. 3d 249
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Notwithstanding, our supreme court stated: This does not mean that disparity in sentences of co-defendants with similar backgrounds, charged with similar participation in identical crimes may not be considered as a factor in determining whether a sentence is excessive and out of proportion to the severity of a crime.
- State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- State v. Thomas 48 So. 3d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Explained State v. Vallier 34 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- Explained State of Louisiana v. Carey Vallier, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- State v. Johnson 33 So. 3d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
State v. Howard
13 So. 3d 729
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.2d Cir.05/13/98), , unit denied, 1998-1778 (La.11/06/98), .
-
State v. Howard
987 So. 2d 330
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.
-
State v. Morris
982 So. 2d 245
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Jackson, 30,-473 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/98), .
-
State v. Birch
979 So. 2d 643
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.
-
State v. Robbins
979 So. 2d 630
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, supra ; State v. Nugent, supra .
-
State v. Smith
967 So. 2d 548
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Nugent, supra .
- Explained State v. Coleman 959 So. 2d 465 La. 2007
-
State v. McNeil
961 So. 2d 554
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Christaw, supra .
-
State v. Christaw
945 So. 2d 217
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/98), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/6/98), .
-
State v. Nugent
938 So. 2d 1188
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/98), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/6/98), .
- State v. Hano 938 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
-
State v. Gatti
914 So. 2d 74
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.
-
State v. Douglas
888 So. 2d 982
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.2d Cir.05/13/98), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/06/98), .
-
State v. Gipson
850 So. 2d 973
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
See, State v. Jackson, 30,473 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/98), .
- State v. Dixon 852 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
State v. Page
837 So. 2d 165
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Francois, supra .
- State v. Floyd 830 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002