Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lewis, 421 So. 2d 224.
- State of Louisiana v. Lester David Cheveallier La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- State Of Louisiana v. Marcus Clayton La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
- State Of Louisiana v. Kody Byers La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
- State Of Louisiana v. Andrew David Wetzel La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
- State Of Louisiana v. Colton Boudreaux La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Julieanne Perales A/K/A Julianne Perales La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Juan Dedilos Villarreal Gamboa La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Roderick T. Branch La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Michael Handley A/K/A Lawrence M. Handley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Tyler John Clause La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Nancy Rogers A/K/A Nancy Lynn Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
-
State Of Louisiana v. Tyler Judson
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
3d 554 per curiam) ( ( La.
-
State Of Louisiana v. Allen James Harrison
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
See Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S. Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 ( 1969); - 26 ( La.
- State Of Louisiana v. Sandy Davis La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
- State Of Louisiana v. Larry Earl Miles La. 2021
- State of Louisiana v. D'Andrae L. McGarr La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
-
State v. Gallagher
274 So. 3d 1285
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In addition, the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Lewis , (La.
- State v. McGarr 268 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
- State v. Hart 183 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
- State v. Banks 163 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
-
State v. O'Brien
168 So. 3d 627
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. |4559(A) provided that a court “may permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn at any time before sentence.” 2 Likewise, -26 (La.1982), held that a trial court may permit the withdrawal of a guilty plea after sentencing if the court finds that the guilty plea was not entered freely and voluntarily, or if there was an inadequate colloquy advising the defendant of the rights he was waiving by pleading guilty and therefore the guilty p
-
State v. Baham
149 So. 3d 1235
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
P. art. 559(A), Mr. Baham’s motion to withdraw was untimely as it was not filed “before sentencing.” the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that a constitutionally infirm plea is subject to attack even after sentencing.
-
State v. Dominick
129 So. 3d 782
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
art. 559 provides in pertinent part that “[t]he court may permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn at any time before sentence.” considered this issue and held that a trial court may permit the withdrawal of a guilty plea after sentencing when the district court finds that the guilty plea was not entered freely and voluntarily or that the Boykin colloquy was inadequate, and, therefore, the plea is constitutionally infirm.
-
State v. Ellison
121 So. 3d 139
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a trial court may permit the withdrawal of a guilty plea after sentencing if the court finds that the guilty plea was not entered freely and voluntarily, or if there was an inadequate colloquy advising the defendant of the rights he was waiving by pleading guilty and th
-
State v. Joseph
95 So. 3d 1209
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 559 provide in pertinent part that “[t]he court may permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn at any time before sentence.” considered this issue and held that a trial court may permit the withdrawal of a guilty plea after sentencing when the trial court finds that the guilty plea was not entered freely and voluntarily or that the Boykin colloquy was inadequate, and, therefore, the plea is constitutionally infirm.
-
State v. Otkins
81 So. 3d 150
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/30/03) , ( (La.
-
State v. Young
71 So. 3d 565
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Likewise, held that a trial court may permit the withdrawal of a guilty plea after sentencing if the court finds that the guilty plea was not entered freely and voluntarily, or if there was an inadequate colloquy advising the defendant of the rights he was waiving by pleading guilty and therefore was constitutionally
-
State v. Causey
67 So. 3d 697
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 559 provide in pertinent part that “[t]he court may permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn at any time before sentence.” considered this issue and held that a trial court may permit the withdrawal of a guilty plea after sentencing when the trial court finds that the guilty plea was not entered freely and voluntarily or that the Boykin colloquy was inadequate, and, therefore, the plea is constitutionally infirm.
-
State v. Scott
8 So. 3d 658
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 11/15/95), , writ denied, 95-2853 (La.2/28/96), ().
- State v. McCoil 924 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
-
State v. Rhea
876 So. 2d 131
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
art. 559 provide in pertinent part that “[t]he court may permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn at any time before sentence.” considered this issue and held that a trial court may permit the withdrawal of a guilty plea after sentencing when the trial court finds that the guilty plea was not entered freely and voluntarily or that the Boykin colloquy was inadequate, and, therefore, the plea is constitutionally infirm.
- State v. Roberts 864 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
-
State v. Temple
789 So. 2d 639
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Morris, 98-2684 (La.App.
- State v. Hoover 785 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
-
State v. McBride
776 So. 2d 546
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Code of Criminal Procedure article 559 provides in pertinent part that “[t]he court may permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn at any time before sentence.” However, concluded that a trial court may permit the withdrawal of a guilty plea after sentencing when the trial court finds that the guilty plea was not entered freely and voluntarily or that the Boykin colloquy was inadequate and therefore that the plea is constitutionally infirm.
-
State v. Myers
753 So. 2d 921
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. King, 93-2146, p. 2 (La.App.
- State ex rel. Chauvin v. State 814 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- State v. Trahan 752 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
-
State v. Morris
729 So. 2d 1141
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. King, 93-2146 (La.App.
-
State in Interest of JG
684 So. 2d 563
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
the supreme court stated the following: When a Trial Judge finds, even after sentencing a defendant, either that a plea of guilty was not entered freely and voluntarily or that the Boykin colloquy was inadequate, and that the plea, therefore, is constitutionally infirm, the Trial Court retains the authority
-
State v. Guzman
665 So. 2d 512
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
appeal after remand, (La.App.
-
State v. King
639 So. 2d 1231
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
However, concluded that a trial court may permit the withdrawal of a guilty plea after sentencing when the trial court finds that the guilty plea was not entered freely and voluntarily or that the Boykin colloquy was inadequate and therefore that the plea is constitutionally infirm.
- State v. Hall 637 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
-
State v. Lapoint
635 So. 2d 554
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
the defendant alleged that he was unintentionally misled by remarks made by the trial judge.
-
State v. Dunbar
633 So. 2d 938
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Even after sentencing, if a trial court finds “either that a plea of guilty was not entered freely and voluntarily or that the Boykin colloquy was inadequate, and that the plea, therefore, is constitutionally infirm, the Trial Court retains the authority to vacate the sentence and set aside the plea.”
- State v. Boudreaux 616 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Waguespack 589 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
State v. Davis
588 So. 2d 1234
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Even after sentencing, if a trial court finds “either that a plea of guilty was not entered freely and voluntarily or that the Boykin colloquy was inadequate, and that the plea, therefore, is constitutionally infirm, the Trial Court retains the authority to vacate the sentence and set aside the plea_”
-
State v. Parker
581 So. 2d 314
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a trial court could consider a motion to withdraw a guilty plea filed after sentencing and, if the motion had merit, a sentence could be vacated and a constitutionally infirm guilty plea could be set aside notwithstanding Article 559.
- State v. Greer 572 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990