Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. LaFleur v. Donnelly, 416 So. 2d 82.

94 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jareona Nicole Crosby La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
  • State v. Lawrence 273 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    LaFleur v. Donnelly , (La.
  • State v. Greenup 269 So. 3d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    LaFleur v. Donnelly , (La.
  • State v. Jackson 259 So. 3d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    LaFleur v. Donnelly , (La.
  • State v. Johnston 251 So. 3d 400 La. 2018
    LaFleur v. Donnelly , , 84 (La.
  • State v. Johnston 221 So. 3d 46 La. 2017
  • State v. Allah 216 So. 3d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    LaFleur v, Donnelly, (La.
  • State ex rel. O'Keefe v. State 194 So. 3d 1107 La. 2016
  • State v. O'Brien 168 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97), .
  • State v. Dominick 129 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Joseph 95 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Wendell Joseph Bienvenu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Hill, 30,552 (La.App.
  • State v. Cummings 79 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    ] and vacated the plea when the record shows that the defendant was not informed of the sentencing range and of the ‘without benefit’ provision.”).
  • State v. Young 71 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Causey 67 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Womack 55 So. 3d 43 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    by stating that “a guilty plea has been found to be constitutionally infirm when the state does not fulfill an express or implied part of the plea bargaining agreement which precipitated defendant’s decision to so plead.”
  • State v. Harrell 40 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Morris 996 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Burford 902 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    the supreme court held that although the defendant's guilty plea was made voluntarily, it was not knowingly and intelligently entered due to his mistaken understanding of when he would be eligible for parole; thus, his convictions and sentences were reversed and set aside.
  • State v. Rhea 876 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Phonesanga Phayarath La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Phayarath 866 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Hernandez 839 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Montalban 810 So. 2d 1106 La. 2002
  • State v. Temple 789 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Hopkins 774 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. McBride 776 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Senterfitt 771 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Guzman 769 So. 2d 1158 La. 2000
  • State v. Phillips 762 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    [LaFleur] v. Donnelly, La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. White 756 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Jones 758 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed a defendant's conviction because he was not informed of the maximum sentence exposure.
  • State v. Johnson 750 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lewis 749 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Cassels, 27,227 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), , 717 and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Trahan 752 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    LaFleur v. *924 Donnelly
  • State v. Flanagan 744 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Stiles 733 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Cassels, 27,227 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), , 717 and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Sebastien 730 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Anderson 732 So. 2d 517 La. 1999
    LaFleur, v. Donnelly, La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Anderson 720 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Reynolds 716 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    our Supreme Court stated that while it is important to explain to the accused the elements of the offenses with which he is charged and the rights he is waiving by pleading guilty thereto, it is probably much more important to the defendant's decision (about whether to plead guilty) that he understand the m
  • State v. Hill 714 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Clay 714 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Cassels, supra .
  • State v. Landry 711 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Lewis 711 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Nicholas 704 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Trujillo v. U.S., 377 F.2d 266 (5th Cir.1967).
  • State v. Ledet 701 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. McGee 698 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Lacoste 695 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Calhoun 694 So. 2d 909 La. 1997