DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Easley, 432 So. 2d 910.

70 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Justin P. Craighead La. 2025
    In that vein, the jurisprudence holds that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Matthew Pardue A/K/A Joseph Matthews Pardue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    ewing the imposition of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be 12 imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Eugene Vascocu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    In reviewing the imposition of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lynn Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    This court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Paul Glenn La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana v. Henry Lawrence Leger AKA Henry Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    In reviewing the imposition of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Rosalyn Faith Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    In reviewing the imposition of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State v. Douglas 72 So. 3d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    This court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Deanna Gaspard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In reviewing the -5- imposition of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State v. Gaspard 49 So. 3d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In reviewing the | ^imposition of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Scotty L. Webre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    imposition 3 of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State v. Webre 21 So. 3d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In reviewing the imposition |., of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State v. Wise 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    This court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under a statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.
  • State v. Calvert 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Freeman 970 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Dustin K. Runyon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In reviewing the imposition of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State v. Runyon 944 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In reviewing the imposition of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dustin K. Runyon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In reviewing the imposition of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State v. Runyon 916 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In reviewing the imposition of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dustin Mathew Burnaman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In reviewing the imposition of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State v. Burnaman 872 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In reviewing the imposition of a maximum sentence, the First Circuit has held: This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State v. Mance 797 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Hilton 764 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State v. Ellis 756 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Brown 737 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Meads 734 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    This court has held that "maximum sentences permitted under statute may be *800 imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State v. Lanieu 734 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Spradley 722 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Parfait 693 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Price 677 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    This Court has stated that maximum sentences permitted under statute may be imposed only for the most serious offenses and the worst offenders, (La.App.
  • State v. Calhoun 669 So. 2d 1359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Robertson 671 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Williams 638 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Williams 638 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Lay 637 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Hunter 628 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Reed 615 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Mickey 604 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Tenner 593 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Jones 593 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Lindsey 583 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Mosby 581 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Gordon 582 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Freeman 577 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Carter 572 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Thomas 572 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. King 563 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Herrin 562 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Green 558 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Varnum 551 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989