Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kem Search, Inc. v. Sheffield, 434 So. 2d 1067.
-
Ronald Davis v. Tube-Tech Services, Inc. & American Liberty Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Moreover, “It is self-evident…that if the trial court’s decision was based on its erroneous interpretation or application of law rather than a valid exercise of discretion, such an incorrect decision is not entitled to deference.” Kem Search
-
H. Edward Sherman v. Old Point Bar, Point Investment Company, Inc., Warren P. Munster, Jr., Dale Edward Triguero, …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
“Conduct which prevents an opposing party from having an opportunity to appear or to assert a defense constitutes a deprivation of legal rights.” Kem Search, (La.
- Bruce Lloyd v. Darlene Elaire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
-
Karl Pentecost v. Joseph W. Grassi, Mckeithen, Ryland, & Champagne
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
2d 762; Kem Search, (La.
- EXCO Operating Company, LP v. BRP, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
-
Robin Oldenburg, wife of/and Gair Oldenburg v. Mohamed Elkersh, M.D. and Advanced Pain Institute Treatment Center, LLC and …
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Kem Search, Inc. Y. Sheffield, ( La.
-
Lzm Properties, LLC v. Private Connection Property, Inc. and John Doe
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
10/16/01), (citing Kem Search, ).
- Maple Avenue Rental Properties, LLC v. Jason T. Sylvester La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
-
Certain Underwriters of Lloyd's London v. Alliance Drilling Consultants, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
However, if the district court’s decision was based on an “erroneous interpretation or application of law rather than a valid exercise of discretion, such an incorrect decision is not entitled to deference.” Kem Search, –72 (La.1983).
-
Succession of Elrose Richard Vidrine
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 5 Cir. 1/27/16), (La.
- Hidden Grove, LLC v. Richard A. Brauns and Leslie Brauns La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- Pontchartrain Natural Gas System, k/d/s Promix, L.L.C., and Acadian Gas Pipeline System v. Texas Brine Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
- Nft Group, L.L.C. v. Elite Pools and Spas, L.L.C. and the Honorable Chelsey Richard Napoleon, in Her Capacity … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
- Trey Johnson, Sr. v. Dwlishia Lanae Rutledge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- Libertas Tax Fund I, LLC v. Candace Taylor La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
-
Diamond Fields and Gerald Sanford Versus Ochsner Medical Center - Kenner, L.L.C.
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
12/22/20), (citing Kem Search, ).
-
Camille Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
termine whether a judgment should be annulled pursuant to Article 2004: “(1) when the circumstances under which the judgment was 2 rendered show the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant who seeks relief, and (2) when the enforcement of the judgment would be unconscionable and inequitable.” Kem Search
-
Crystal Rose Moffett v. Marcus Delaney Moffett
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
2d 34, 43, citing in part Kem Search, (“[I]f the trial court's decision was based on its erroneous interpretation or application of law rather than a valid exercise of discretion, such an incorrect decision is not entitled to deference.”) This principle also applies to legal errors concerning custody proceedings.
- Hidden Grove, LLC v. Richard A. Brauns and Leslie Brauns La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
-
Carmen Bergeron Mosing v. Sharon Mosing Miller
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Louisiana jurisprudence has established a two-part test to determine whether a judgment should be annulled pursuant to Article 2004: “(1) when the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered show the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant who seeks relief, and (2) when the enforcement of the judgment would be unconscionable and inequitable.” Kem Search
-
The City of Shreveport v. CenturyTel Solutions, LLC
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
2d 34, citing Kem Search, (La.
- J. Benjamin Zapata And Amanda Zapata v. Stephen Wayne La. 2021
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of S.M. (DOB: 07/11/06), N.M. (DOB: 04/02/07), B.M. (DOB: 01/07/09), D.M. (DOB: … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
-
William Thomas Coppage v. Transdev Services, Inc., New Orleans Regional Transit Authority
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
(citing Kem Search, -72 (La.
-
LPR, L.L.C. v. Lynn C. Naquin and Denise Diaz Naquin
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
( quoting Kern Search, Inc. v. 5 Sheffield, - 72 ( La.
- Centurion Capital Corp. v. Wanda D Littlefield La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
-
Dr. Albert Lagraize Versus Rachele Basler, Derrick Riley and People Speak, L.L.C.
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Kem Search, Inc., v. Sheffield, (La.
- In Re: Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Kayla Marles Neville La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
-
Camille Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Ass'n, Inc., Kem Search[, ]; Bell Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc., 01–0149 (La.10/16/01)
- The Bank of New York Mellon Fka the Bank of New York, as Trustee v. Michael E. Oldemeyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- Joseph Kolwe, Jr. v. Civil and Structural Engineers,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-
Kolwe v. Civil & Structural Eng'rs, Inc.
264 So. 3d 1262
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Kem Search, Inc. v. Sheffield
-
State v. Mosk
257 So. 3d 206
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 2/26/14), , 1219 (citing Kem Search, Inc. v. Sheffield , , 1070 (La.
-
Tracy Alexander v. State of La; Dept. of Children & Family Services
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Ass’n, Inc., Kem Search, []; Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc., 01–0149 (La.10/16/01)
-
Alexander v. State
249 So. 3d 95
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Ass'n, Inc. , ; Kem Search, [Inc. v. Sheffield , ] ; Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc. , 01-0149 (La.
- Marlon Eaglin v. Eunice Police Department La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Eaglin v. Eunice Police Department 228 So. 3d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
England v. England
223 So. 3d 582
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/26/00), (quoting Kem Search, ).
-
Alexander v. La. State Board of Private Investigator Examiners
211 So. 3d 544
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 5 Cir. 4/29/15), (citing Kem Search, (La.
-
Riddle v. Premier Plaza of Monroe, L.L.C.
216 So. 3d 170
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
06/01/12), , citing Kem Search, (La.
-
Radcliffe 10, L.L.C. v. Ronald G. Burger and Lynda O. Burger
219 So. 3d 296
La. 2017
art. 2004 requires a showing that the Article 2329 judgment was Aobtained by fraud or ill practices.@ Relative to Radcliffe, the Burgers= failure to file a joint petition in the Article 2329 action did not constitute Aimproper practice or procedure@ amounting to Afraud or ill practices@ as contemplated by the decision in Kem Search, (La.
-
Patrick Richard v. State of La, Off of Gov., Div. of Adm, Off Risk Mgmt, Dotd
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
fraud or intentional wrongdoing, but is sufficiently broad to encompass all situations wherein a judgment is rendered through some improper practice or procedure which operates, even innocently, to deprive the party cast in judgment of some legal right, and where the enforcement of the judgment would be unconscionable and inequitable.” Kem Search
-
Richard v. State
239 So. 3d 840
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Kem Search, Inc. v. Sheffield , , 1070 (La.1983).
-
Boes Iron Works, Inc. v. Gee Cee Group, Inc.
206 So. 3d 938
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
App. 4 Cir. 1/24/07), (citing Kem Search, Inc, v, Sheffield, (La.
- Expert Oil & Gas, L.L.C. v. Mack Energy Co. 203 So. 3d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-
Kanda Construction, LLC v. Gebre
197 So. 3d 791
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Kem Search, -72 (La.1983).
-
Buster's Frozen Custard, LLC v. Lancaster Manufacturing, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
art. 2004 to judgments seeking to be annulled for fraud or ill practices, the supreme court in Kem Search, (citations omitted), stated: Our jurisprudence sets forth two criteria to determine whether a judgment has been obtained by actionable fraud or ill practices: (1) when the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered show the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant w
-
Buster's Frozen Custard, LLC v. Lancaster Manufacturing, Inc.
190 So. 3d 1239
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
art.2004 to judgments seeking to be annulled for fraud or ill practices, the supreme court in Kem Search, (citations omitted), stated: Our jurisprudence sets forth two criteria to determine whether a judgment has been obtained by actionable fraud or hi practices:’ (1) when the circumstances under which the judgment'was réndered show the.
-
Camille Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Ass’n, Inc., Kem Search[, ]; Bell Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc., 01-0149 (La.10/16/01)
-
Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc.
189 So. 3d 540
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Ass’n, Inc., Kem Search[, ]; Bell Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc., 01-0149 (La.10/16/01), .