Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jackson, 450 So. 2d 621.

168 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Anthony N. Green Sr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. Demond Franklin La. 2025
art. 802(1) likewise directs the trial court to charge the jury “as to the law applicable to the case.” (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Marvin K Chest La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Jkari Campbell La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
However, the case cited by Defendant, (La.
Lanard Lavigne Versus State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
App. 4th Cir. 1990) the court held that the trial court was within its discretion in allowing the prosecution to challenge for cause all jurors who stated that they could not consider a verdict of guilty due to the mandatory life sentence that would be required if the defendant were convicted.19 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Ezekiel Brown La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. In The Interest Of H.J. La. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Charles R. Lane La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
App. 5 Cir. 8/10/16), ( (La.
State of Louisiana v. Louie Von Cole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Smith 275 So. 3d 266 La. 2019
State v. Morgan 244 So. 3d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. English 243 So. 3d 1145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Corei K. Guidry 221 So. 3d 815 La. 2017
State v. Otkins-Victor 193 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
65 State v. Jackson, *534 State v. Alvarez, 10-925 (La.App.
State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
58 State v. Alvarez, 10-925 (La.App.
State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
State v. Reed 185 So. 3d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Alvarez, 10-925 (La.App.
State v. Bell 178 So. 3d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Baker, 582 So.2d *242 1320 (La.App.
State v. Cavalier 171 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See also, (de-fendant must state the basis for his objection to provide the trial judge with an opportunity to make the proper ruling and prevent or cure an error.)
State v. Rouser 158 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Griffin 167 So. 3d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Alvarez, 10-925 (La.App.
Lott v. Mahalia Jackson Residual Family Corp. XYZ Shareholders & XYZ Directors 153 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Patin 150 So. 3d 435 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
State v. Williams 138 So. 3d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Alvarez, 10-925 (La.App.
State v. Lavy 142 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Simmons 136 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Alvarez, 10-925 (La.App.
State v. Wilson 138 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-33 (1984) (in prosecution for first degree murder, “the offense of negligent homicide was not fairly supported by the evidence; and thus the special instruction was not pertinent and need not have been given”)
State v. Banks 128 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The specific error which the trial judge is making must therefore be pointed out to the judge, and it is settled that defendant is limited on appeal to grounds for the objection articulated at trial.”
State v. Snyder 128 So. 3d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Styles, 96-897 (La.App.
State v. Perkins 120 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
art. 807, which provides in part that requested special written charge shall be given “if it does not require qualification, limitation, or explanation, and if it is wholly correct and pertinent.” See also State v. Goodley, 2001-0077 (La.6/21/02), ; State v. Scott, 2009-0138 (La.App.
State v. Bazile 144 So. 3d 719 La. 2013
Const, art. I, § 17(a); 12 overruled on other grounds by State v. Guillory, 2010-1231, p. 3 (La.10/8/10); (“There is clearly no state constitutional right not to be tried by a jury, except in the very unusual case where a fair jury trial is impossible or unlikely.”); (same).
State v. Hayes 108 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-34 (La.1984); State v. *366 Brooks, 98-0693 (La.App.
State v. Granger 103 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Garry Wayne McClinton, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Campbell, 94-1140 (La.App.
State v. Parker 76 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 807, which provides in part that requested special written charge shall be given “if it does not require qualification, limitation, or explanation, and if it is wholly correct and pertinent.” See also State v. Goodley, 2001-0077 (La.6/21/02), ; (La.
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-34 (La.1984) (citations omitted).
State v. Green 62 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Willis 987 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
-34 (La.1984), the general rule regarding the inclusion of sentencing ranges in arguments and jury instructions was summarized by the Louisiana Supreme Court as follows: When the penalty imposed by the statute is a mandatory one, the trial judge must inform the jury of the penalty on the request of the defendant a
State v. Chatman 981 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
The law regarding whether a defendant is entitled to a -634 (La.1984): When the penalty imposed by the statute is a mandatory one, the trial judge must inform the jury of the penalty on request of the defendant and must permit the defense to argue the penalty to the jury.
State v. Gage 965 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
-634 (La.1984) (internal citations omitted); State v. McBroom, 27,027 (La.App.2d Cir. 5/10/95), , citing State v. Jackson, supra .
State v. Stukes 944 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Washington 931 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Washington 931 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Elliott 896 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Ford 867 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
However, -34 (La.1984): When the penalty imposed by the statute is a mandatory one, the trial judge must inform the jury of the penalty on the request of the defendant and must permit the defense | 13to argue the penalty to the jury.
State v. Myers 839 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
summarized the current status of the law: When the penalty imposed by the statute is a mandatory one, the trial judge must inform the jury of the penalty on request of the defendant and must permit the defense to argue the penalty to the jury.
State v. Grainer 834 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Richardson 830 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-34 (La.1984): When the penalty imposed by the statute is a mandatory one, the trial judge must inform the jury of the penalty on the request of the defendant and must permit the defense to argue the penalty to the jury.
State v. Johnson 820 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Robert Jackson was indicted for first degree murder.
State v. Jones 814 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002