Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Telsee, 425 So. 2d 1251.

594 citing documents.

State v. Ellis 497 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Brazell 499 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Hawkins 496 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Scott 496 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Cockerham 496 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Dew 495 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Tel-see, [ ] ” The Supreme Court of this state has held that maximum sentences are appropriately imposed in cases involving the most serious violations of the described offense, and for the worst
State v. Hobbs 494 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Bailey 494 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Mayfield 493 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Shelton 490 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Strickland 486 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Spencer 486 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Dye 486 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Johnson 486 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Bonnette 487 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Dorsey 484 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Frelix 484 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Johnson 483 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Hagans 482 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Washington 482 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Francis 482 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Brogdon, supra at 625
State v. Washington 482 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Coolie 483 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
which held that a sentence within statutory limits may nonetheless be excessive
State v. Williams 479 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Williams 479 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. O'NEAL 478 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Caston 477 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Brogdon, supra at 625
State v. Byrd 476 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Walker 476 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Major 476 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Johnston 476 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Wright 476 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Sepulvado, supra.
State v. Freeman 474 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Smith 474 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
as follows: “The basic principles of appellate review of sentences under our state constitution are well settled.
State v. Burgess 475 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Thompson 473 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Telsee [ ], supra
State v. Pruitt 474 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Pruitt 474 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Morgan 472 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hart 472 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Tatum 471 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Brockett 471 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Adams 471 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Dixon 471 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Brogden, supra at 625
State v. Collins 470 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Griffin 470 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Henry 470 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Brisco 470 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by