Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Telsee, 425 So. 2d 1251.

594 citing documents.

State v. Lloyd 535 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
2d 96 (La.1983); State v. Williams, 454 So.
State v. Bouie 532 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Studivant 531 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Love 535 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
An excessive sentence is one which “(1) makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and hence is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering; or (2) is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.”
State v. Wright 535 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Woodle 529 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
An excessive sentence is one which “(1) makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and hence is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering; or (2) is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.”
State v. Harrison 529 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Villavicencio 528 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Carr 530 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Royal 527 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Yarls 527 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Rahman 525 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Devillier 525 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Deville 525 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Derry 525 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
An excessive sentence is a sentence which “(1) makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and hence is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering; or (2) is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.”
State v. Davis 528 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
2d 96 (La.1983); State v. Williams, 454 So.
State v. Gilmore 522 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Rodgers 525 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Pender 521 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Carter 522 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Franklin 519 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Broadhurst 517 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Michaels 516 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Collins 520 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Taylor 514 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
An evidentiary hearing should have been granted by the trial judge in this case in light of the supreme court’s “An opportunity to present information at a presentence hearing is of particular importance when the defendant pleads guilty because it may be his only chance to effectively present his version of the offense and his version of mitigating factors.” The cited supreme court cases and fairness to the defendant
State v. Flunder 517 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Wright 513 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Arcement 514 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Puerto 513 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Hernandez 513 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Lynch 512 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Orgeron 512 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Bunch 510 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Brown 508 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Delatte 506 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Parker 506 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Vital 505 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Babson 505 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
...” The appellate standard for determining whether a sentence is unconstitutionally excessive has been articulated by this court as follows: “A sentence is excessive if it is grossly disproportionate to the severity of the offense.
State v. Rochefort 504 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
While it is true that another factor to be analyzed in determining whether punishment is constitutionally disproportionate is comparison of the defendant's punishment with the sentences imposed for similar crimes by the same court and other courts [ (La.
State v. Olson 503 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Tate 506 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Freeman 503 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
2345 , 85 L.Ed.2d 862 (1985)
State v. Joe 502 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Bolden 501 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Gray 502 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Lombard 501 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Pierre 500 So. 2d 382 La. 1987
State v. Rousell 501 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Burge 498 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986