Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Simmons, 443 So. 2d 512.

73 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of A.B.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 5 Cir. 1/25/05), ().
State of Louisiana v. William G Perkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Shane Michael Perez La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State v. Alexander 267 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
12/2/08), ; State v. Simmons , , 515 (La.
State v. Floyd 250 So. 3d 1165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Jacob Dewayne Purvis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Purvis 217 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Goodly -Aka- Christopher Bryant Goodly La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Connelly has therefore also modified our former jurisprudential rule that intoxication may negate the voluntariness of a statement if it is of such a degree that it renders the defendant “unconscious of the consequences of what he is saying.”
State v. Goodley 209 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
essential prerequisite for suppressing a statement on voluntariness grounds is misconduct or overreaching by the police.”) [[Image here]] Connelly has therefore also modified our former jurisprudential rule that intoxication may negate the voluntariness of a statement if it is of such a degree that it renders the defendant “unconscious of the consequences of what he is saying.”
State v. Alexander 194 So. 3d 33 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
P. art. 703 D; State v. Blank, supra
State v. Jackson 132 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Martin, 2004-924 (La.App.5th Cir.1/25/05), .
State of Louisiana v. Brenda Gail Rains La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Rains 101 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Thornton 83 So. 3d 1024 La. 2012
Connelly has therefore also modified our former jurisprudential rule that intoxication may negate the voluntariness of a statement if it is of such a degree that it renders the defendant “unconscious of the consequences of what he is saying.”
State of Louisiana v. Martin P. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. White 74 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Decloues 62 So. 3d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Aaron W. Ardoin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Ardoin 58 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Every 35 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
see also State v. James, 04-0878 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Rogers 19 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
State v. Marshall 6 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
State v. Hemphill 942 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
State v. James 897 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
State v. Martin 895 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Genter 872 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Poullard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
State v. Poullard 863 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
State of Louisiana v. John R. Chesson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
the supreme court explained that “[i]ntoxication will render a confession inadmissible when the intoxication renders the defendant incapable of understanding his right to remain silent.” The trial court found this complaint to be without merit.
State v. Chesson 856 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
the supreme court explained that "[i]ntoxication will render a confession inadmissible when the intoxication renders the defendant incapable of understanding his right to remain silent."
State v. Raiford 846 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
State v. Qutoum 839 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
However, a fifteen year sentence was imposed for this crime where defendant set fire to a bingo hall containing approximately 100-150 individuals.
State v. Vigne 820 So. 2d 533 La. 2002
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
State v. Loyd 810 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. McNeal 785 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Broaden 780 So. 2d 349 La. 2001
When the source of comments about other crimes is a potential juror, prejudice is unlikely and a mistrial not merited when the remaining jurors "were not exposed to the factual basis for the [objectionable] juror's possible partiality [and knowledge of an accused's background.]" -18 (La.1983).
State v. Richardson 779 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Hobley 752 So. 2d 771 La. 1999
State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
State v. Gradley 745 So. 2d 1160 La. 1998
State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
85 , 139 L.Ed.2d 42 (1997); Davis, 92-1623 at p. 19, 637 So.2d at 1024
State v. Corley 703 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Martin 679 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
State v. Fowlkes 634 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994