Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prudholm, 446 So. 2d 729.

589 citing documents.

State v. Wright 593 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. James 592 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Smith 591 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Lobato 588 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Collins 588 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986)
State v. Spotville 583 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Myers 584 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. West 582 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.
State v. Clark 581 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
the Supreme Court stated; "[R]ecantations are highly suspicious and, except in rare cases a motion for new trial should not be granted on the basis of a recantation since that disclaimer is tantamount to admission of perjury so as to discredit the witness at a later trial."
State v. Walters 582 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Johnson 580 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963)
State v. Williams 580 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Dickerson 579 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Smith 577 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Art. 924 et seq.; (La.App.
State v. Clay 576 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Walker 576 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Pizzo 575 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Fleming 574 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Stanford 574 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Sneed 571 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Valentine 570 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.App.
State v. Jackson 570 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
interpreted the statute as follows, at 735: ...
State v. Robinson 569 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Hunt 568 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Shepherd 566 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Gurley 565 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
citing Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct.
State v. McGraw 564 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Ross 561 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Frith 561 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Hunter 563 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Burrell 561 So. 2d 692 La. 1990
-33 (La.1982) (on rehearing).
State v. Rodriguez 554 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Jones 559 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Sterling 558 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Brown 557 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
*1090 Talbot, supra; State v. Jackson, 253 La.
State v. Johnson 557 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Knapper 555 So. 2d 1335 La. 1990
State v. Woolridge 555 So. 2d 1385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.App.
State v. Washington 556 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. McGhee 554 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Johnson 553 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. West 553 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
the Supreme Court stated that where a general request is made for exculpatory materials, a conviction will only be overturned if the omitted evidence created a reasonable doubt that did not otherwise exist.
State v. Taylor 553 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Matthews 552 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Mims 552 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Ketchens 552 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Kanupp 552 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Johnson 551 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Rubbicco 550 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by