Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prudholm, 446 So. 2d 729.

589 citing documents.

State v. Taves 846 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Schexnaider 852 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Haynes 847 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. MacCracken 845 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Payne, 00-1171 (La.App.
State v. Bradford 846 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Fleming 846 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Walker 844 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Additionally, with regard to the issue of effective assistance of counsel, that "defendant's remedy is through post conviction relief in the trial court where the quality of the attorney's assistance can be fully developed and explored".
State v. Marshall 843 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Hall 843 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Smith 844 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Crawford 848 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Guilbeau 838 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Griffin 838 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Lee 840 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Watts 835 So. 2d 441 La. 2003
See State v. Brisban, XXXX-XXXX, p. 12 (La.2/26/02), ; State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 26 (La.4/11/00), ; -736 (La.1984).
State v. Garrick 832 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Grainer 834 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Hampton, 94-1943 (La.App.
State v. Bagneris 830 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Randall 830 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Kemp 828 So. 2d 540 La. 2002
State v. Alexander 829 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Payne, 00-1171 (La.App.
State v. Foster 828 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Lee 826 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Jason 820 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Jones 822 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); State v. Hankton, 96-1538 (La.
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
State v. Fontana 821 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Taylor 821 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
See, State v. Huff, 27,212 (La.App.
State v. Porche 819 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Dangerfield 816 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Cowart 815 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Payne, 00-1171 (La.App.
State v. George 829 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Sewell 811 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
1562 , 146 L.Ed.2d 466 (2000)
State ex rel. Z.S. 811 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
(1984); State v. Payne, 00-1171 (La.App.
State v. Brisban 809 So. 2d 923 La. 2002
State v. Womack-Grey 809 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Lipscomb 807 So. 2d 218 La. 2002
State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Porter 806 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Black 806 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Goldston 804 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Laird 800 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Wilson 803 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Lewis 800 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Wright 796 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
3 Cir. 6/4/97) , 248-249: “A defendant attempting to suppress an identification must prove both that the identification itself was suggestive and that there was a likelihood of mis-identification as a result of the identification procedure.”
State v. Holley 799 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Mathews 809 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Offray 797 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.App.
State v. Moore 797 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by