Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prudholm, 446 So. 2d 729.

589 citing documents.

State v. Homes 799 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Johnson, 557 * (La.App.
State v. Egana 792 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
(1984); State v. Payne, 00-1171 (La.App.
State v. Miller 792 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Camese 791 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
If the court finds the identification suggestive, five factors are to be considered in determining the likelihood of misidentification as a citing Manson : (1) the witness's opportunity to view the defendant at the time the crime was committed; (2) the degree of attention paid by the witness during the commission *180 of the crime; (3) the accuracy of any prior description; (4) the level of the witness's certainty displayed at the time of
State v. Marino 804 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Holmes 791 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Divers 793 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Raines 788 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Pounds 789 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Tapp 788 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Holmes 787 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Biglane, 738 So.2d at 635 .
State v. Winding 787 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.App.
State v. Rodriguez 786 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. King 782 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Brauner 782 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Lacy 782 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Porche 780 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Davis 781 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Carter 779 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Banks 779 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977), (La.
State v. Leban 777 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Lewis 776 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Williams 776 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Payne 777 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Joseph, 96-187 (La.
State v. Simmons 779 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Myers 773 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Crowell 773 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Johnson, 557 * (La.App.
State v. Handy 772 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Wilson 773 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Hampton, 94-1943, p. 9 (La.App.
State v. Richardson 779 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Huff 27,212 (La.App.2d Cir.8/23/95), , writ denied, 96-0212 (La.5/1/97), ; (La.App.
State v. Quest 772 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Foret, 96-281 (La.App.
State v. Echols 774 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Weaver 770 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Lipscomb 770 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Newman 769 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Davis 768 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Defendant also points to the standards of review of a trial court's decision on a
State v. James 788 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Debrow 763 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Moye 765 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Sparrow, 90-1498 (La.
State v. Johnson 766 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Johnson 764 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Boles 763 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Bright 776 So. 2d 1134 La. 2000
2243, 2254 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Kanost 759 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Lindsey 758 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. McGee 758 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Hampton, 94-1943 (La.App.
State v. Ballett 756 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); State v. Hankton, 96-1538 (La.App.
State v. Lee 755 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. McGee 757 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000