Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prudholm, 446 So. 2d 729.

589 citing documents.

State v. Johnson 718 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Dozier 713 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Chess 713 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Francis 715 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. McHenry 711 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Hubbard 711 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Burmaster 710 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Clark 703 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Cavalier 701 So. 2d 949 La. 1997
State v. Holmes 701 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Bunch 695 So. 2d 1341 La. 1997
cf. Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390, 403-04 , 113 S.Ct.
State v. Smith 697 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Parker 696 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Five factors are to be considered in determining the likelihood of misidentification as a citing Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct.
State v. Jones 696 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Jackson 694 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Williams, supra.
State v. Fisher 692 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State in Interest of Or 690 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Williams 687 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
wherein the court held that a trial court may grant a motion for mistrial if a witness's remark on the stand is so prejudicial that an admonishment under La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Hampton 686 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Hernandez 686 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Joseph 685 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Foret 685 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Addison 684 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Gonzales 680 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Tucker 682 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Huls 676 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Walter 675 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Lavigne 675 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Christian 675 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
which cited Manson v. Brathwaite, supra.
State v. Cockerham 671 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Holmes 670 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Birtha 669 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Alberto 665 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Dorsey 662 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Taylor 662 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Huff 660 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Green 660 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Tate 657 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Ellis 657 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Short 655 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Hunter 654 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Five factors are to be considered in determining the likelihood of misidentification as a citing Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct.
State v. Johnson 652 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Toney 651 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Merrill 650 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Smith 647 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Williams 647 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Guidry 647 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
on motion of the defendant, shall grant a new trial whenever: * * * * * * (3) New and material evidence that, notwithstanding the exercise of reasonable diligence by the defendant, was not discovered *509 before or during the trial, is available, and if the evidence had been introduced at the trial it would probably have changed the verdict or judgment of guilty;" LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Grubbs 644 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Martin 643 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994