Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prudholm, 446 So. 2d 729.

589 citing documents.

State v. Camp 641 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Serio 641 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Giles 639 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Williams 637 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986)
State v. Soler 636 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Duncan 635 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986)
State v. Brown 636 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Rodriguez 635 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Price 636 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Ford 631 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Carter 630 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Wolfe 630 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. McPherson 630 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Bibb 626 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Robinson 624 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Shepherd, supra .
State v. Fontan 624 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Leon 623 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Johnson 622 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Gales 622 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Savage 621 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Johnson 619 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Smith 618 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Gay 616 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Porter 615 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.App.
State v. Van Buren 615 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.App.
State v. Wiley 614 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Hunter 614 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Diaz 612 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Lewis 612 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Sparrow 612 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Love 611 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.App.
State v. Dukes 609 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Deal 607 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
3 Cir.1985), which stated: "`This rule contains the four generally recognized requisites for the motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence: (1) the evidence must have been discovered since the trial, (2) failure to learn of the evidence at the time of trial was not due to defendant's lack of diligence
State v. Bullock 604 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Wallace 602 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Smith 600 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Harrison 598 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Dotson 598 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.App.
State v. Frazier 599 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Hammons 597 So. 2d 990 La. 1992
8A James W. Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 33.03[1] (2d ed. 1991); 3 Charles A. Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure § 557 (2d ed. 1982); IV Wharton's Criminal Procedure § 599 (Charles E. Torcia ed., 1976).
State v. Montgomery 598 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Ordinarily those complaints are best left to applications for post conviction relief, but in this instance those complaints can be *555 resolved by a review of the record, and in the interest of judicial economy, the court can consider such a claim if the record on appeal contains sufficient evidence to address the merits of the claim.
State v. Wright 598 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Wright 598 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Bellamy 599 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Young 596 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Ross 594 So. 2d 885 La. 1992
State v. Battieste 597 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Martin 595 So. 2d 592 La. 1992
2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986)
State v. Kelly 595 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992