Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Soco, 441 So. 2d 719.

234 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Julieanne Perales A/K/A Julianne Perales La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    Dondis cited two cases in which such relief had been granted; (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. LeDarron Demarion Carter La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Calvin Duhon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    Dondis cited two cases in which such relief had been granted; (La.App.
  • State v. Kisack 190 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Hartford 162 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    -721 (La.1983); see also State v. Hamdalla, 12-1413 (La.App.
  • State v. Alverez 158 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Percy 137 So. 3d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Adger, 35,111 (La.App.2d Cir.9/26/01), , and State v. Walker, 29,877 (La.App.2d Cir.10/29/97), .
  • State v. Hamdalla 126 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    art. 894.1, the “record must reflect that the judge adequately considered these guidelines.”
  • State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Savoy 93 So. 3d 1279 La. 2012
    While a trial court may not use its assessment of defendant’s credibility as the sole basis for imposing a relatively harsh sentence, Quebedeaux, 424 So.2d at 1014 , a court may “tak[e] into *1284 account the defendant’s honesty under oath as a measure, ⅛ light of all other knowledge gained about the defendant ...
  • State v. Randall 69 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Colvin 65 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    art. 894.1 and whether the sentence is warranted in light of the particular circumstances of the case.” Robinson , p. 2, 744 So.2d at 127 ( ).
  • State v. Every 35 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Juengain 41 So. 3d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Wiltz 28 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    the Court also stated that “Maximum sentences provided by the statutes are reserved for the ‘worst kind of offender.’ ” Id., at 720
  • State v. Cook 19 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Harvey 12 So. 3d 496 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
  • State v. Jones 7 So. 3d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Ambeau 6 So. 3d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    State v. Trepagnier, 97-2427 (La.App.
  • State v. Fountain 976 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Martin 970 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Galindo 968 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Boudreaux 966 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Gauthier 941 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    the Supreme Court also stated that "[m]aximum sentences provided by the statutes are reserved for the `worst kind of offender'."
  • State v. Stanton 929 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Scott 913 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Newman 879 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    the Supreme Court also stated that *887 “[mjaximum sentences provided by the statutes are reserved for the ‘worst kind of offender’.” Id.
  • State v. Lewis 876 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    the Supreme Court also stated that "[m]aximum sentences provided by the statutes are reserved for the `worst kind of offender'."
  • State v. Allen 876 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    the Supreme Court also stated that "[m]aximum sentences provided by the statutes are reserved for the `worst kind of offender'."
  • State v. Coleman 857 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Ballard 848 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. James 849 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Allen 844 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Dempsey 844 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Marshall 843 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Harris 842 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Rasheed 841 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Robertson 840 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Alvey 839 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Pham 839 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Wix 838 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Dangerfield 834 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Williams 833 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Burt 828 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Coleman 828 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Melancon 826 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Mitchell 818 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Adger, 35,111 (La.App.2d Cir.9/26/01), .
  • State v. Jones 814 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Spot 812 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002