Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Captville, 448 So. 2d 676.

1134 citing documents.

State v. Williams 893 So. 2d 7 La. 2004
State v. Major 888 So. 2d 798 La. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Michael Alexander La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), and must determine “whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Alexander 888 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State of Louisiana v. Matthew James Nolan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Nolan 882 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Brown, 02-1922 (La.5/20/03)
State v. Falkins 880 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Smith 877 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson 870 So. 2d 995 La. 2004
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Sylvia, 01-1406, p. 2 (La.4/9/03), ; (La.
State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
State v. Neal, 00-0674, (La.6/29/01) ().
State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
State v. Brown 868 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Lee 864 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Zeringue 862 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Qutoum, 02-780, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Helou 857 So. 2d 1024 La. 2003
State v. Matthews 859 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Chisley 860 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Qutoum, 02-780 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Michael Charles Magdaleno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Magdaleno 856 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Marston, 00-0589 (La.3/16/01)
State v. Barton 857 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Turner 850 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Qutoum, 02-780, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Brown 846 So. 2d 715 La. 2003
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State v. Harris 846 So. 2d 709 La. 2003
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
State ex rel. D.P.B. 846 So. 2d 753 La. 2003
[T]he appellate Lcourt must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State Ex Rel. Dpb 846 So. 2d 753 La. 2003
State v. Dilosa 849 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Sylvia 845 So. 2d 358 La. 2003
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Fields 842 So. 2d 316 La. 2003
State v. Williams 842 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Bolton 844 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Gaspard 841 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Sandoval 841 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. McDonald 838 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Qutoum 839 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Wooten, 99-181 (La.App.
State v. Bishop 835 So. 2d 434 La. 2003
State v. Wright 834 So. 2d 974 La. 2002
State v. Williams 831 So. 2d 835 La. 2002
State v. Davis 829 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Wooten, 99-181 (La.App.
State v. Segura 829 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Wooten, 99-181 (La.App.
State v. Collins 826 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Karam 834 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
State v. Matthews 814 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Debrow 810 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Under the Jackson standard, “the appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the | aprosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Brooks 811 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
`does not determine whether another possible hypothesis has been suggested by defendant which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion.'" State v. luke, 98-341 (La.1/8/99), ().
State v. Harrell 811 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Noil 807 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Kempton 806 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001