Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., 444 So. 2d 618.

126 citing documents.

Lori Bernier v. St. Tammany Parish School Board, Melissa Schoegel, individually and on behalf of minor child, E.L. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., ( La.
William Alan Pesnell And La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Acadiana Renal Physicians, Amc v. Precious Hodges La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Everette D. Mayo, Jr., Et Ux v. Lagniappe Willow Lake, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., .
Dino Vincent Tuminello, Sr. and Tiffany Tuminello v. Abc Insurance Company, Epic Entertainment, LLC D/B/A Epic Entertainment Amusement … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Steve Crooks v. State of La. Through the Dept. of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Lafayette Consolidated Government v. Rmd Holdings, Ltd. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Steve Crooks and Era Lea Crooks v. State of Louisiana, Department of Natural Resources La. 2020
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Higgins v. Williams Energy Partner, L.P. 267 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc. , , 620 (La.
Barbara E. Davidson v. Charles Eugene Sanders, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., ...
Davidson v. Sanders 261 So. 3d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
927, 931 ; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc. , ...
Gbb Properties Two, LLC v. Stirling Properties, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
GBB Properties Two, LLC v. Stirling Properties, Inc. 230 So. 3d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Cador v. Deep South Equipment Co. 166 So. 3d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Following Bazley , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the intentional act exception within the context of an employer’s exception of no cause of action in Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Sun Coast Contracting Services, LLC v. Dien's Auto Salvage, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Sun Coast Contracting Services, Inc. v. Dien's Auto Salvage, Inc. 148 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., ...
Koch v. Covenant House New Orleans 109 So. 3d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Veroline v. Priority One EMS 18 So. 3d 1273 La. 2009
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Susan Elizabeth Jackson Piccione v. Richard James Piccione La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Piccione v. Piccione 20 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Rachelle Starrett Preuett v. Ira Anderson Preuett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Preuett v. Preuett 4 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Spencer Bertrand v. Robert Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Jimmy Vidrine v. Constructors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Heather Hoffman v. Target Corporation of Minnesota La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Hoffman v. Target Corp. of Minnesota 951 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Short v. Short 912 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Evans v. Bossier Parish School Bd. 903 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Charkhian, supra ; see Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Traweek v. LaBorde, 30,551 (La.App.
Paternostro v. Ocean Technical Services, Inc. 887 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Hall v. Zen-Noh Grain Corp., 01-0324 (La.4/27/01), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Wirthman-Tag Const. Co., LLC v. Hotard 804 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
See Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Jackson v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Corrs. 785 So. 2d 803 La. 2001
1991); Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Hall v. Zen-Noh Grain Corp. 787 So. 2d 280 La. 2001
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Blackett v. City of Monroe 766 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Holloway v. Midland Risk Ins. Co. 759 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
McGuire v. Bank One, Louisiana, N.A. 744 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Stevens v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 29,124 (La.App.
City of New Orleans v. Bd. of Dir. of State Museum 739 So. 2d 748 La. 1999
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Arledge v. Hendricks 715 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
See Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Jenkins v. Waste Management of Louisiana, Inc. 709 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Eschete v. City of New Orleans, 258 La.
Carriere v. Bank of Louisiana 702 So. 2d 648 La. 1997
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Trans La. Gas v. LA. INS. GUAR. ASS'N 693 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 26,388, p. 1 (La.App.
Trans Louisiana Gas Co. v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 693 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 26,388, p. 1 (La.App.
Gaspard v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 688 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
App. 4 Cir. 10/12/95), , writ denied, 95-C-2735 (La.1/26/96), ; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Stevens v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 688 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Borden v. West Carroll Parish Police Jury 685 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Darville v. Texaco, Incorporated, Weber v. State, 93-0062 (La.4/11/94), .
Avenue Plaza, LLC v. Falgoust 676 So. 2d 1077 La. 1996
1080 , , 332 *1080 (La.1972); See also Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
Bridges v. Carl E. Woodward, Inc. 663 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the exception of no cause of action is not the appropriate procedural device to dispose of a LSA-R.S.
Trondsen v. Irish-Italian Parade Committee 656 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Landry v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc. 653 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Initially, plaintiffs contend summary judgment is not an appropriate procedural device for determining the question of intent on summary judgment, for the proposition that intent can be alleged generally, for the general proposition that summary judgment is rarely appropriate for a determination of a subjective fact such as intent.
Trahan v. McManus 653 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.