Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Save Ourselves, Inc. v. La. Environ. Cont. Com'n, 452 So. 2d 1152.

115 citing documents.

Healthy Gulf v. Secretary, Louisiana Department of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
Rochell Provost v. State of Louisiana Division of Administrative Law and Louisiana Department of Insurance La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
3d 1045, citing Save Ourselves, ( La.
Healthy Gulf and Sierra Club v. Secretary, Louisiana Department of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Article IX, § 1 of the Louisiana Constitution “imposes a duty of environmental protection on all state agencies and officials, establishes a standard of environmental protection, and mandates the legislature to enact laws to implement fully this policy.” Save Ourselves, Inc. v. Louisiana Env’t Control Com’n, (La.
Rise St. James, Louisiana Bucket Brigade, Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, Healthy Gulf, Earthworks & No Waste … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Joseph Larocca and Larocca Auto Sales, Inc. Versus Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Environmental Control Commission, (La.
Westlawn Cemeteries, L.L.C. Versus The Louisiana Cemetery Board La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Louisiana Environmental Action Network v. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Environmental Control Commission, (La.
St. Martin Parish Government v. Bryan Champagne La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Control Comm’n, (footnotes omitted), stated with respect to the Public Trust Doctrine: It is the well settled law of this country that a state holds title to land under navigable waters within its limits and that the title is held in trust for the people of the state that they may enjoy and
Victor Covington v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
In the Matter of Dr. Eric D. Cerwonka, Psy.D La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Louisiana Land & Exploration, Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Once in Save Ourselves, Inc. v. Louisiana Environmental Control Comm’n, and a second time in Avenal v. State, 03-3521 (La.
Joseph v. Secretary, Louisiana Department Of Natural Resources 265 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Save Our Hills v. La. Dep't of Envtl. Quality 266 So. 3d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Save Ourselves, Inc. v. Louisiana Environmental Control Commission , , 1159 (La.
Onezime v. La. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr. 243 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Spears v. Louisiana Board of Practical Nurse Examiners 223 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Environmental Control Commission, (La.
Louisiana Environmental Action Network v. Welsh 224 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
City of Baton Rouge v. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality 172 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Holmes v. Louisiana State Board of Nursing 156 So. 3d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Save Ourselves, Inc. v. Louisiana Environmental Control Com’n
AAA Safety, Inc. v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 146 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Save Ourselves, Inc. v. Louisiana Environmental Control Com’n
Nolan v. State 148 So. 3d 198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Save Ourselves, Inc. v. Louisiana Environmental Control Com’n, On legal issues, the reviewing court gives no special weight to the findings of the administrative tribunal, but conducts a de novo review of questions of law and renders judgment on the record.
Citizens Against Multi-Chem v. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality 145 So. 3d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Save Ourselves, -58 (La.1984), and In re Rubicon, Inc., 95-0108 (La.App.
Miccol Enterprises, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 106 So. 3d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Control Comm’n, -59 (La.1984).
Haygood v. Louisiana State Board of Dentistry 101 So. 3d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Control Comm’n, Rochon v. Whitley, 96-0835, p. 5 (La.App.
Louisiana All Star Baseball Corp. v. State ex rel. Department of Revenue Office of Charitable Gaming 77 So. 3d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In re General Permit for Discharges from Oil & Gas Exploration, Development, & Production Facilities, Permit Number: LAG260000 70 So. 3d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
As has been routinely held since the Louisiana Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Save Ourselves, a decision of the LDEQ must satisfy the issues of whether: (1) the potential and real adverse environmental effects of the proposed project have been avoided to the maximum extent possible; (2) a cost-benefit analysis of the environmental impact costs balanced against the social and economic benefits of the
Evangelist v. Department of Police 32 So. 3d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Environmental Control Comm., Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Costle, 590 F.2d 1011 (D.C.Cir.1978); K. Davis, Administrative Law (1982 Supp.) at 536 et seq.
In the Matter of Jackpot Enterprises, LLC v. Louisiana Gaming Control Board 25 So. 3d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Environmental Control Commission, (La.
Aubert v. Department of Police 19 So. 3d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Environmental Control Comm., Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Costle, 590 F.2d 1011 (D.C.Cir.1978); K. Davis, Administrative Law (1982 Supp.) at 586 et seq.
Oakville Community Action Group v. Plaquemines Parish Council 7 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In Re Belle Co., LLC 978 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Samuels v. Goodwin 950 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Save Ourselves, Rochon v. Whitley, 96-0835, pp. 4-5 (La.
Salvant v. State 935 So. 2d 646 La. 2006
Oakville Community Action Group v. LDEQ 935 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
[8] In the "IT decision," Save Ourselves, the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth a number of factors to be considered by LDEQ when employing a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether to grant or deny a permit for a proposed facility.
Cochrane v. Louisiana Tax Com'n 905 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Save Ourselves, Rochon v. Whitley, 691 So.2d at 192.
Grefer v. Alpha Technical 901 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
See, Matter of American Waste and Pollution Control, Co., 93-3163 (La.9/15/94), and Save Ourselves
Lake Bistineau Pres. v. Wildlife Com'n 895 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
The plaintiffs also complain that the defendants did not create a record adequately setting out the basic facts and establishing a rational connection between its findings and the decision made, as required under Save Ourselves
Smith v. State Dept. of Health & Hospitals 895 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Avenal v. State 886 So. 2d 1085 La. 2004
The Jurisich court noted that this Court in Save Ourselves, has interpreted that article as follows: This is a rule of reasonableness which requires an agency or official, before granting approval of proposed action affecting the environment, to determine that adverse environmental impacts have been minimized or avoided as much as possible consistently with th
Kirsch v. New Orleans Police Department 859 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
49:964; Save Ourselves, Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Costle, 590 F.2d 1011 (D.C.Cir.1978); K. Davis, Administrative Law (1982 Supp.) at 536 et seq.
EnerQuest Oil & Gas, LLC v. Asprodites 843 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Save Ourselves, Inc. v. Louisiana *539 Environmental Control Comm.
Warren Energy Resources v. La. Tax Com'n 825 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
EOP NEW ORLEANS v. Louisiana Tax Com'n 831 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
See Save Ourselves, Panacon , 97-2093 at p. 4, 747 So.2d at 574 .
In Re Shintech, Inc. 814 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Danigole v. New Orleans Police Department 812 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
North Baton Rouge Environmental v. La. Deq 805 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
[3] In Save Ourselves, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the "test of [La.
In Re Belle Co., LLC 809 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
evised Statute 30:2014.3 governing the review of DEQ decisions provides: A. This Section shall apply to the department and all permit applicants and shall apply only with respect to the public trustee issues, as provided in Article IX, Section 1 of the Constitution of Louisiana and by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case of Save Ourselves, (La.
Blair v. Stalder 798 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Environmental Control Commission
Coalition for Good Gvt. v. Louisiana Dept. of Environmental Quality 772 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In the case of Save Ourselves, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the "test of § 964 G(6) is used in reviewing the facts as found by the agency, as opposed to the arbitrariness test used in reviewing conclusions and exercises of agency discretion."
Schackai v. Louisiana Bd. of Massage Therapy 767 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In Re Basf Corporation's Exemption Permit 765 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Thereafter, the district court remanded the matter to the DEQ Secretary to make basic findings supported by the evidence and ultimate findings which flow rationally from the basic findings, and for the articulation of a rational connection between the facts found and the decision granting the exemption to BASF, as required by Save Ourselves