Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Lyons, 452 So. 2d 1161.

104 citing documents.

Succession of Mary Agnes Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Joshua Christopher Smith v. Laura Babin Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
12/12/03), ( and McCormick on Evidence, § 340(b), p.798 (2d ed.1972)) ].
J. A. D. v. K. B. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
12/12/03), ( and McCormick on Evidence, § 340(b), p.798 (2d ed.1972))].
Succession of Clarence Walker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Fletcher, Succession of Duboin, 94–446 (La.App.
In re Succession Elliott 269 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Succession of Lyons , (La.
Burnett v. Full Force Staffing, LLC 257 So. 3d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4th Cir. 1994) ( ; Succession of Lyons , (La.
Camilla Julianna Farrar v. Linda Faye Whaley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Farrar v. Whaley 211 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Succession of Benoit 165 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
Succession of Claby Pierre Chiasson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
The law pertaining to testamentary capacity was laid out by the supreme court in -66 (La.1984) (alterations ours): The capacity to make a will is tested at the time the will is made.
Perry M. Westbrook v. Katherine Broussard Weibel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
―Clear and convincing‖ evidence is applied in civil cases only in exceptional circumstances, ―where there is thought to be special danger of deception, or where the court considers that the particular type of claim should be disfavored on policy grounds.‖ Talbot v. Talbot, 03-814 (La.12/12/03), ( and McCormick on Evidence, § 340(b), p. 798 (2d ed.1972)).
Westbrook v. Weibel 80 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Clear and convincing” evidence is applied in civil cases only in exceptional circumstances, “where there is thought to be special danger of deception, or where the court considers that the particular type of claim should be disfavored on policy grounds.” Talbot v. Talbot, 03-814 (La.12/12/03), ( and McCormick on Evidence, § 340(b), p. 798 (2d ed.1972)).
Griffith v. Latiolais 48 So. 3d 1058 La. 2010
“Clear and convincing” evidence is applied in civil cases only in exceptional circumstances, “where there is thought to be special danger of deception, or where the court considers that the particular type of claim should be disfavored on policy grounds.” Talbot v. Talbot, 03-814 (La.12/12/03), ( and McCormick on 11REvidence, § 340(b), p. 798 (2d ed.1972)).
Bradley Griffith v. Resa Latiolais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Only in exceptional controversies is the clear and convincing standard applied in civil cases “where there is thought to be special danger of deception, or where the court considers that the particular type of claim should be disfavored on policy grounds.” (quoting MCCORMICK ON EVIDENCE § 340(b), p. 798 (2d ed. 1972)).
Griffith v. Latiolais 32 So. 3d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Only in exceptional controversies is the clear and convincing standard applied in civil cases “where there is thought to be special danger of deception, or where the court considers that the particular type of claim should be disfavored on policy grounds.” (quoting McCormiok on Evidence § 340(b), p. 798 (2d ed.1972)).
In Re Succession of Theriot 4 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Similarly, the burden of proving lack of testamentary capacity is upon the party alleging it
Succession of Merrick 989 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Succession of Maquar, 03-0041, p. 12 (La.App.
Succession of Jerrell D. Wiggins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Succession of Wiggins 984 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In Re Succession of Lawler 980 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Succession of Boisseau, 33,861 (La.App.
In Re Succession of Fisher 970 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
In Re Succession of Pardue 915 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
In Re Succession of Crawford 923 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Succession of Nellie Johnson Fruge Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
In Re Succession of Young 867 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Talbot v. Talbot 864 So. 2d 590 La. 2003
In this Court stated that "persons attempting to overcome the presumption of community property status ...
Succession of Maquar 849 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Further, a testator is “presumed to have testamentary capacity, and the opponent bears the burden of defeating this presumption by putting forth clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.” Id., citing
Succession of Cooper 830 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Cupples, supra, (La.App.
In Re Succession of Linder 824 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
In Re Succession of Miller 803 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
art. 1477; Cupples v. Pruitt, 32,786 (La.App.2d Cir.3/1/00), .
In Re Succession of Graham 803 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
[8] , (La.1984); Succession of Fletcher 94-1426 (La.App.
In the Matter of Succession of Brantley 789 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Succession of Moody, 227 La.
Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc. 772 So. 2d 94 La. 2000
In Re Succession of Boisseau 768 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Cupples v. Pruitt, 32,786 (La.
Pettifield v. Venture, Inc. 770 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Cupples v. Pruitt 754 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Succession of McClinton 736 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Sudwischer v. Estate of Huffpauir 705 So. 2d 724 La. 1997
Succession of Reeves 704 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
McGaughey v. City of New Orleans 695 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Succession of Lyons, supra [ ].
Succession of Young 692 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Fletcher, ; Succession of Duboin, 94-446 (La.App.
Williamson v. Haynes Best Western 688 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Succession of Bilyeu 681 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Matter of Succession of Calhoun 674 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Succession of Dodson 669 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Succession of Dowling, 93-1902 (La.App.
Bass v. Farmer & Cheatham 658 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
[2] *326 Proof by clear and convincing evidence is described by the Louisiana supreme court in (emphasis in original): Generally, this third burden of proof requires more than a "preponderance of the evidence" but less than "beyond a reasonable doubt".
Succession of Barranco 657 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
McCraney v. Sanderson Farms, Inc. 657 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
The existence of the disputed fact must be highly probable, that is, much more probable than its non-existence.” (La.
Succession of Fletcher 653 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Succession of Christensen 649 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994