Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Whitaker, 463 So. 2d 1291.

25 citing documents.

In Re: Judge Jerry L. Denton, Jr. La. 2022
However, “no new evidence is presented to [the Supreme Court] and only that evidence adduced at the hearing before the Commission is considered.” In re Decuir, 95-0056, p. 7, 654 So.2d at 692 ( (La.
In Re: F. Stanton Hardee, III Sa La. 2021
I N Re: Justice Of The Peace Cody King, Ward 6, Morehouse Parish, State Of Louisiana J Udiciary … La. 2020
In Re: Justice of the Peace Jeff Sachse Ward 1, Livingston Parish State of Louisiana 240 So. 3d 170 La. 2018
ge’s behavior both on and off the bench must comply with the highest of standards delineated in the Canons.” Accordingly, “[a] criminal act for which any citizen may be punished by imprisonment is much more serious when the conduct is that of a judge,” and such conduct “is clearly prejudicial to the administration of justice and brings the judicial office into disrepute.” In re: Whitaker, (La.
In Re: Justice of the Peace J. Roosevelt Gremillion District Seven Parish of Pointe Coupee State of Louisiana 204 So. 3d 183 La. 2016
In Re Benge 24 So. 3d 822 La. 2009
Rule XXIII, § 29; See generally, In re Huckaby, III, 95-0041 (La.5/22/95), , 296
In Re Freeman 995 So. 2d 1197 La. 2008
In In re: Whitaker, this court stated: The most severe discipline should be reserved for judges who use their office improperly for personal gain; judges who are consistently abusive and insensitive to parties, witnesses, jurors and attorneys; judges who because of laziness or indifference fail to perform their judicial
In re Justice of the Peace Franklin 969 So. 2d 591 La. 2007
In Re Miller 949 So. 2d 379 La. 2007
This Court stated in : "The most severe discipline should be reserved for judges who use their offices improperly for personal gain; judges who are consistently abusive and insensitive to parties, witnesses, jurors and attorneys; judges who because of laziness or indifference fail to perform their judicial duties to the best of t
In Re Whitaker 948 So. 2d 1067 La. 2007
In Re Krake 942 So. 2d 18 La. 2006
This court in In re: Whitaker, set forth guidelines for determining which types of misconduct warrant removal from judicial office.
In re Cresap 940 So. 2d 624 La. 2006
Among other cases, the Commission cited In re Bowers, 98-1735 (La.12/1/98), , and In re: Whitaker, (abusive behavior by a judge); In re Fuselier, 02-1661 (La.
In Re Doggett 874 So. 2d 805 La. 2004
As this court stated in : The most severe discipline should be reserved for judges who use their office improperly for personal gain; judges who are consistently abusive and insensitive to parties, witnesses, jurors and attorneys; judges who because of laziness or indifference fail to perform their *814 judicial duties to the
Explained In Re Hughes 874 So. 2d 746 La. 2004
We elaborated on this concept in *766 wherein we explained: "Respondent, while an attorney, could not choose only lawabiding citizens as his clients, but when he became a judge, he was required to avoid any personal association with persons known for criminal activities.
In Re Davis 865 So. 2d 693 La. 2004
In re Wimbish, 98-2882 (La.4/13/99), ; In re Quirk, 97-1143 (La.12/12/97)
In Re McInnis 769 So. 2d 1186 La. 2000
See In re Bowers, 98-1735, p. 9 (La.12/1/98), -81 ; In re Johnson, 96-1866, p. 15 (La.11/25/96), , 1202; In re Haggerty, 257 La.
In Re Johnson 767 So. 2d 2 La. 2000
In re: Thibodeaux, 99-0014 (La.7/7/99), (citing In re: Quirk, 97-1143 (La.12/12/97), ); In re: Hunter, 98-0446 (La.7/8/98), (citing In re: Decuir, 95-0056 (La.5/22/95), ; In re: Whitaker, ).
In Re Bowers 721 So. 2d 875 La. 1998
In re Hunter 715 So. 2d 1188 La. 1998
In Re Harris 713 So. 2d 1138 La. 1998
(a *1142 judge's intentional association with persons known for criminal activity is prejudicial to the administration of justice and brings discredit to the judicial office.)
In Re Quirk 705 So. 2d 172 La. 1997
For example, in and this court declined to address those charges upon which the Commission, because of lack of evidence, did not make a recommendation.
In Re Johnson 683 So. 2d 1196 La. 1996
In Re Decuir 654 So. 2d 687 La. 1995
In Re Huckaby 656 So. 2d 292 La. 1995
*296 We recognized in that because this court is the court of original jurisdiction in judicial disciplinary proceedings, it serves as the finder of fact in such proceedings.
Nu-Lite Electrical Wholesalers, Inc. v. DECKARD & TREADAWAY ELEC. AIR CONDITIONING & REFRIGERATION 498 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986