Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wilson v. City of New Orleans, 479 So. 2d 891.

51 citing documents.

The Parish of Plaquemines v. Rozel Operating Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Karen Cohen Kinnett Versus Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
1187, 14 L.Ed.2d 62 (1965); (La.
Michael Brantley, Jr. Versus City of Gretna & Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
1989), as modified on reh’g (June 29, 1989); (La.
Delandro Washington v. Shreveport Fire and Police Civil Service Board and City of Shreveport La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Thomas B. Powell v. State Board of Certified Public Accountants of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Karen Cohen Kinnett Versus Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State v. Jones 275 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Deandrus Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Persons whose rights may be affected are entitled to be heard; and in order that they may enjoy that right, they must first be notified.”
Bossier v. Garber 263 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
894 (La.1985) also expressed: [The] central meaning of procedural due process is well settled.
Korey Bossier v. Mark Garber La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
also expressed: [The] central meaning of procedural due process is well settled.
Gregory Cormier v. City of Lafayette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Persons whose rights may be affected are entitled to be heard; and in order that they may enjoy that right, they must first be notified.” (citations omitted).
Cormier v. City of LaFayette 254 So. 3d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Wilson v. City of New Orleans , , 894 (La.1985) (citations omitted).
Uletom Hewitt v. City of Lafayette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Persons whose rights may be affected are entitled to be heard; and in order that they may enjoy that right, they must first be notified.’
Hewitt v. Lafayette City-Parish Consol. Gov't 243 So. 3d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Patricia Powell v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 12/14/94), -11 (), writ denied, 95-845 (La.5/12/95)
Powell v. Rapides Parish Sch. Bd. 238 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 12/14/94), , 1010-11 (quoting Wilson v. City of New Orleans , ), writ denied , 95-845 (La.5/12/95), .
Aucoin v. Department of Police 229 So. 3d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Kasha Lapointe v. Vermilion Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Ms. LaPointe argues that she was deprived of an unbiased tribunal and the right to call witnesses.
LaPointe v. Vermilion Parish School Board 177 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Ms. LaPointe argues that she was deprived of an unbiased tribunal and the right to call witnesses.
State of Louisiana v. Jessie M. Griffin, II 180 So. 3d 1262 La. 2015
See Fuller v. Oregon, 417 U.S. 40 (1974) (holding that, provided there are sufficient due process safeguards in place, statutory schemes that require a convicted defendant to reimburse state actors for work undertaken due to his or her own wrongdoing do not offend the constitution); (La.
Kasha Lapointe v. Vermilion Parish School Board 173 So. 3d 1152 La. 2015
Persons whose rights may be affected are entitled to be heard; and in order that they may enjoy that right, they must first be notified.” (citations omit-tedX Am equal concomitant to this right is “the right to notice and opportunity to be heard,” which must be extended at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.
Davis v. State Board of Certified Public Accountants 131 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
Hooper v. Hero Lands Co. 128 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Rodney Irchirl v. Natchitoches Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 12/14/94), -11 (), writ denied, 95-845 (La.
Irchirl v. Natchitoches Parish School Board 103 So. 3d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 12/14/94), -11 (), writ denied, 95-845 (La.5/12/95), .
Harris v. Department of Police 125 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Persons whose rights may be affected are entitled to be heard; and in order that they may enjoy that right, they must first be notified.” Moore v. Ware, 01-3341, pp. 12-13 (La.2/25/03)
City of Kenner v. Kenner Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board 31 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
City of Alexandria v. Alexandria Civil Service Commission La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Wilson v. The City of New Orleans, 85-0712, (La.
City of Alexandria v. Alexandria Civil Service Commission 23 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Wilson v. The City of New Orleans, 85-0712
Banks v. New Orleans Aviation Bd. 989 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
(relying on Arnett v. Kennedy, supra ).
Maggio v. Maggio 981 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Reed v. Department of Police 967 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Marks v. New Orleans Police Dept. 943 So. 2d 1028 La. 2006
1487, 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985)
Moore v. Ware 839 So. 2d 940 La. 2003
Moore v. Ware 800 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
also expressed “[The] central meaning of procedural due process is well settled.
State v. Edwards 752 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
any significant taking of property by the state is within the purview of the Due Process Clause.
Perot v. Link Staffing Services 744 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Fields v. State 714 So. 2d 1244 La. 1998
State v. Rotramel 670 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
as follows: If there is a deprivation of life, liberty or property which is based on disputed facts or issues, the individual whose interests are affected must be granted a fair procedure before a fair decision maker.
Plaisance v. City of Lafayette 651 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that the United States Supreme Court has held that hearings which take place after the government action, when combined with other safeguards, will suffice.
Rubin v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 649 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
also expressed: "[The] central meaning of procedural due process is well settled.
State v. Touchet 642 So. 2d 1213 La. 1994
1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970); Mathews v. Eldridge, supra
State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976), and adopted by this court (when interpreting the Louisiana state constitution) and
State v. 1979 Cadillac Deville 627 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Butler v. DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS 609 So. 2d 790 La. 1992
Martin v. Rush's Fabricare Center, Inc. 590 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 [1985]), and the “booting” of a vehicle because of its owner’s excessive parking violations ( [La.1985]).
Paillot v. Wooton 559 So. 2d 758 La. 1990
In Re Adoption of BGS 556 So. 2d 545 La. 1990
1187 , 14 L.Ed.2d 62 (1965)
Hayden v. Louisiana Public Service Com'n 553 So. 2d 435 La. 1989
864 , 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1982)
Littleton v. Littleton 514 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987