Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Watermeier v. Watermeier, 462 So. 2d 1272.

56 citing documents.

Gwendolyn Diamond v. Decarrious Byrcious Jenkins La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Elizabeth LeBlanc Schroeder v. Alan Conrad Schroeder La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Brandy Megan Broussard Wadsworth v. Christopher David Wadsworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
At the start of the hearing, the trial court conducted a (La.App.
Anthony E. Hill v. Jason Strickland La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Anthony E. Hill v. Christine Strickland La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Shanika Edmond v. Dominique Edmond La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
s best interest "to be 4 ( La.
Rebacca L. Hagood Versus James David Sinnott, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Susana F. Moody v. Ross Moody La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
After reciting the applicable standard, Bergeron, the trial court stated: 2 (La.App.
Wendy Marie Martinez Couvillon v. Michael Andre Couvillon La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana in the Interest of M.N., M.N., and Z.O. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
The juvenile court approved DCFS' s case plan, which recommended reunification with a concurrent goal of adoption and placement in a 3 ( La.
Amber Leger v. Kyle Brandon Leger La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
When 8 ( La.App, 5 Cir.), writ denied, 464 So.
Lisa Johanna Swenson Coulon v. Charles Joseph Coulon La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Crystal Rose Moffett v. Marcus Delaney Moffett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Dimitri I. Ikonitski v. Kateryna Ikonitski La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Raymond Smith v. Holly Farish La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Keshawn Patterson v. Tacarra Charles La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
in chambers outside the presence of either party.6 After hearing testimony from the parties and L.J., the trial court granted the protective order against Charles, which will expire on July 3, 2020, prohibiting Charles from contacting L.J., and ordering Charles to stay away from L.J.’s residence and school.7 5 (La.
Jones v. Jones 274 So. 3d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
See Watermeier v. Watermeier , (La.
State v. Titus 274 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In Watermeier v. Watermeier , (La.
S.L.B. v. C.E.B. 252 So. 3d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In Watermeier v. Watermeier , , 1275 (La.
Laurent v. Prevost 251 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See Watermeier v. Watermeier , (La.
Starks v. Starks 250 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Watermeier v. Watermeier , (La.App.
Danae Marie Guillot Starks v. Bradley Dyson Starks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Hiatt v. Duhe 238 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In re Interdiction of Benson 216 So. 3d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Watermeier Hearing The trial court conducted a Watermeier hearing with Mr. Benson prior to trial in an attempt to “have a complete perspective of the case.” (La.App.
State ex rel. N.C. 184 So. 3d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Christina Marie Sorrells, Born Richard v. Steven Ray Sorrells La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Sorrells v. Sorrells 178 So. 3d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Wilson v. Wilson 170 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
She cites this Court’s (La.App.
Shana J. Toups v. Bobby Dean Toups La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
D.M.S. v. I.D.S. 225 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In re D.C.M. 170 So. 3d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
M.T.B.'s pleading was erroneously captioned "Declinatory Exception of Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Declinatory Exception of Res Judicata, and Alternative Motion to Stay.” . (La.App.
Mulkey v. Mulkey 108 So. 3d 116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Penn v. Penn 28 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Next, we address Mrs. Penn’s argument that the trial court erred by refusing to interview the minor children in chambers outside the presence of their parents and by allowing the father to personally cross-examine one of the minor children, (La.App.
Woods v. Woods 987 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
2d Cir.7/21/04), ), (La.App.
In re Cresap 940 So. 2d 624 La. 2006
Fernandez v. Pizzalato 902 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Gs v. Ts 900 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In Weaver, the plaintiff urged that the trial court erred in failing to make a record of its in-camera interview of her daughter, (La.App.
G. S. v. T. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In Weaver, the plaintiff urged that the trial court erred in failing to make a record of its in-camera interview of her daughter, citing Watermeier v. 8 Watermeier, (La.App.
G.S. v. T.S. 900 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In Weaver, the plaintiff urged that the trial court erred in failing to make a record of its in-camera interview of her daughter, (La.App.
Brown v. Brown 877 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
*1234 EVIDENTIARY RULINGS Error No. 1(A): By this assignment the appellant contends the trial court erred when it did not allow the three youngest children, ages 11, 10, and 8, to testify in court, nor did the court make a record of its in-camera interview, (La.App.
Weaver v. Weaver 824 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
*441 CHILD WITNESS Laura urges that the trial court erred in refusing to put Sara on the stand and in failing to make a record of its in-camera inspection of her, (La.App.
State Ex Rel. Gjl 791 So. 2d 80 La. 2001
2 Cir.1986), writ denied, (La.App.
Nail v. Clavier 745 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3 Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
Hicks v. Hicks 733 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3 Cir.), writ denied, (emphasis added.); (La.App.
Raney v. Wren 722 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Gould v. Gould 687 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Fuge v. Uiterwyk 653 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Rodgers v. Rodgers 643 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
We remind the district court that if upon remand the court determines to privately interview the child, (La.
Lyons v. Lyons 571 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Simmons v. Simmons 554 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989