Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vanderpool, 493 So. 2d 574.

58 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen McPhearson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jose M. Sagastume La. 2023
10/26/07), (per curiam), (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Gilbert J. Burciaga La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Allen Joseph Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
8 the supreme court was called upon to address whether a challenge for cause was improperly denied.
State of Louisiana v. Jewel Demon Humphrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Jose M. Sagastume La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
10/26/07), (per curiam);3 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Eddie Lee O'brien, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Erick Gail Gragg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Randy Keith Baldridge, II -Aka- Randy Baldridge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Prince Record La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Record 266 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Vanderpool , , 575 (La.
State of Louisiana v. George D. Lowdins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Lowdins 229 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Murphy 206 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. K.W. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
the Fairley court determined the record showed an objection sufficient to allow a merit review of the defendant’s challenge for cause.
State v. Anderson 28 So. 3d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(citations omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court interpreted the above articles.
State v. Jones 884 So. 2d 582 La. 2004
State v. Rodriguez 822 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
On the other hand, a defendant who has not exhausted his peremptory challenges must establish that he was prejudiced by a ruling denying a cause challenge, e.g., that he was forced to hoard his remaining peremptory challenges at the cost of accepting a juror he would have peremptorily challenged.
State v. Dangerfield 816 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
art. 921; State v. Berry, 95-1610, at 5 (La.App.
State v. Ballard 747 So. 2d 1077 La. 1999
State v. Brown 742 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Perrilloux, 95-677 (La.App.
State v. Richardson 729 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Robertson, 630 So.2d at 1280 ; State v. Mathis, 675 So.2d at 1220 .
State v. Johnson 728 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
the Court recognized that "[o]ur law is ...
State v. Davis 722 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
On the other hand, a defendant who has not exhausted his peremptory challenges must establish that he was prejudiced by a ruling denying a cause challenge, e.g., that he was forced to hoard his remaining peremptory challenges at the cost of accepting a juror he would have peremptorily challenged.
State v. Ballard 718 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Robinson, using two Louisiana State Supreme Court cases, held that article I, section 16 of the Louisiana Constitution prohibits badge-wearing law-enforcement officers from being on a criminal jury.
State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Carvis Webb. State of Louisiana V. Dalmaus Jacobs. 704 So. 2d 240 La. 1997
(“The requirement that objection be raised contemporaneously is not meant to be inflexible, but is designed ‘to promote judicial efficiency and to insure fair play.’”) ().
State v. Gaines 688 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Robinson 684 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Perrilloux 669 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. George 661 So. 2d 975 La. 1995
art. 841; State v. Porter, 93-1106, p. 3, fn.
State v. Lutcher 652 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Fairley 645 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Robertson 630 So. 2d 1278 La. 1994
State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Jones 623 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
The State has presented a
State v. Ross 623 So. 2d 643 La. 1993
to hold that: "the defendant must establish that he was prejudiced by the court's ruling."
State v. McSweeney 619 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Tyler 619 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Essex 618 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Williams 615 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Ross 604 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Jackson 601 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Explained State v. Johnson 595 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Usner v. Strobach 591 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
City of Baton Rouge v. Schmieder 582 So. 2d 1266 La. 1991
State v. Young 569 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
This interpretation of the 1983

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by