Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 474 So. 2d 919.

147 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Sidney Myers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Indeed, “A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.” (emphasis added), cert.
State of Louisiana v. Michael T. Robinson Denzel West Kirk Powell La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jordan D. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. William A. McDonough La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Kayla Jean Giles Coutee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
“’[A] challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.’” -90 (La.1990)(emphasis added)().
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Barnes Derrick Groves La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Michael Lee Walls La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
State v. Walls 270 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Aaron Orlando Richards -Aka- Aaron Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
State v. Richards 247 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Allen Joseph Morehead La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Morehead 239 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Payton 245 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
12/19/16), ; State v. Jones , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Mark Anthony Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Broussard 224 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Earnest G. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Hamilton 216 So. 3d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Lance Washburn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Washburn 206 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Hampton 195 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Tucker, supra at 617 ().
State of Louisiana v. Calvin Louis Noel, III AKA - Calvin Noel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
State v. Noel 181 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares ’his ability to remain impartial, if the 'juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker 181 So. 3d 590 La. 2015
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Harold Lee Julien, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
State v. Julien 139 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
State v. Segura 127 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
State of Louisiana v. Jerome Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
at 858 ( (alteration in original)).
State v. Thomas 124 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
at 858 ( (alteration in original)).
State of Louisiana v. Catrina L. Wallace La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror‟s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
State v. Wallace 92 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
State of Louisiana v. Terry L. Clarkson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
―A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror‘s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.‖
State v. Clarkson 86 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
State of Louisiana v. Michael Jason Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Miller 49 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
See State v. Cosey, 97-2020 (La.11/28/00), ; State v. Miller, 99-0192 (La.9/6/00)
State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
abbing her, slashing her throat, and dropping a couch on her face); State v. Tilley, 99-0569 (La.7/6/00), (defendant killed a 68-year-old man by repeated stabbing during the course of an armed robbery in the parking lot of a Burger King); State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), (defendant repeatedly and viciously stabbed two people during a home invasion); (defendant kidnapped 11-year-old victim, beat her, raped her, and choked her to death, eventually dumping her body in a drainage canal).
State v. Kennedy 957 So. 2d 757 La. 2007
v. Butler, -74 (La.1988); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Lindsey 948 So. 2d 105 La. 2007
Cross , 93-1189 at p. 7, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Bourque, 622 So.2d at 225 ; cert.
State of Louisiana v. Mitchell Pat Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Mayeux 949 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Thomas 938 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006