Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 496 So. 2d 261.

65 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Sidney Myers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
the supreme court found (in dicta) that the trial court erred in denying a challenge for cause of a juror who knew the victim’s parents and whose son dated the victim in high school.
State of Louisiana v. William A. McDonough La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
La Const. Art. I, § 16; (La.
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Barnes Derrick Groves La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Donasty Anwanique Cohen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
in support of her argument: “When a prospective juror admits to having a personal relationship with the victim or the victim’s family, it is unrealistic to believe the juror could be impartial in his or her deliberations concerning the defendant’s guilt or innocence.” The State argues Brown i
State of Louisiana v. Miles J. Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
27 the supreme court found a challenge for cause was improperly denied where a prospective juror whose son had dated the victim in high school, testified that she would have a difficult time facing the victim’s parents if she returned a not guilty verdict and also indicated that her son’s former relat
State v. Guidry 271 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In State v. Brown , , 265 (La.1986), the supreme court found a challenge for cause was improperly denied where a prospective juror whose son had dated the victim in high school, testified that she would have a difficult time facing the victim's parents if she returned a not guilty verdict and also indicated that her son's former relation
State v. Cohen 272 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Defendant cites the following from State v. Brown , , 265 (La.1986), in support of her argument: "When a prospective juror admits to having a personal relationship with the victim or the victim's family, it is unrealistic to believe the juror could be impartial in his or her deliberations concerning the defendant's guilt or innocence."
State of Louisiana v. Michael Lee Walls La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
ole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably [inferred].” See State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), Maxie, 93-2158 at 16-17, 653 So.2d at 535; -1390 (La.1990) (per curiam); -65 (La.1986)
State v. Walls 270 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
929 (La.1985) ; See State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), , 423 ; Maxie , 93-2158 at 16-17, 653 So.2d at 535 ; , 1389-1390 (La.1990) (per curiam); , 264-65 (La.1986) ; , 38 (La.1983).
State of Louisiana v. Aaron Orlando Richards -Aka- Aaron Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably [inferred].” See State v. Frost, 97–1771, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), Maxie, 93–2158 at 16–17, 653 So.2d at 535; –1390 (La.1990) (per curiam); –65 (La.1986)
State v. Richards 247 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1990) (per curiam); , 264-65 (La.1986) ; , 38 (La.1983).
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
a prospective juror indicated her son had gone to high school with the victim for three years, and the victim had visited her home on several occasions.
State v. Hamilton 127 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Buckley 120 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably [inferred].” See State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), ; Maxie , 93-2158 at 16-17, 653 So.2d at 535 ; -1390 (La.1990) (per curiam); -65 (La.1986)
State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Pegues 43 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Eason 3 So. 3d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
State v. Lee 964 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. David Lee Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In support of his position
State v. Leger 907 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In support of his position, (La.
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
LA CONST. ANN. art. I, § 16; Bell, 315 So.2d at 309 .
State v. Van Sales 867 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. George 855 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
State v. Jacobs 789 So. 2d 1280 La. 2001
State v. Taylor 781 So. 2d 1205 La. 2001
State v. McCullough 774 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Const. art. I, § 16; State v. Bell, So.2d 307 (La.1975).
State v. Richardson 779 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
State v. Hundley 760 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
Const. art. 1, § 16; (La.
State v. Johnson 706 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Hart 691 So. 2d 651 La. 1997
State v. Divers, 94-0756 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -81 ; -64 (La.1986).
State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
However, this court did hold that a juror who previously dated the victim should have been excused for cause.
State v. Divers 681 So. 2d 320 La. 1996
-81 (La.1994); State v. Ross, *324 -64 (La.1986).
State v. Mathis 675 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
Thompson, 516 So.2d at 352
State v. Perrilloux 669 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Maxie 653 So. 2d 526 La. 1995
1/14/94); 630 So.2d at 1280-1281 , -264 (La.1986).
State v. Plater 643 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. McLemore 640 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
For a discussion of the factors to be considered in determining whether a change of venue is appropriate, (La.App.
State v. Robertson 630 So. 2d 1278 La. 1994
*1281 93 (La.1987); -66 (La.1986).
State v. Alexander 620 So. 2d 1166 La. 1993
State v. Holmes 619 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993