DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Counterman, 475 So. 2d 336.

297 citing documents.

  • State v. Nelson 247 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    Nevertheless, in the interest of judicial economy and to avoid useless delay, we will entertain the appeal, noting that defendant could be entitled to reinstatement of his appellate rights pursuant to State v. Counterman , (La.
  • State v. Nelson 248 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    Nevertheless, in the interest of judicial economy and to avoid useless delay, we will entertain defendant's appeal, noting that he could be entitled to reinstatement of his appellate rights pursuant to State v. Counterman , (La.
  • State ex rel. Moore v. State 239 So. 3d 279 La. 2018
    Finally, relator fails to show that he pled guilty involuntarily and/or is entitled to an out-of-time appeal under State v. Counterman
  • State v. Harrison 239 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Patterson 241 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    Based upon the record before this Court, there is no indication that the defendant ever waived his constitutionally protected right to appeal his convictions and sentences and the defendant would be granted an out of town appeal pursuant to State v. Counterman , , 338 (La.
  • State v. Brown 239 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    On April 18, 2017, the trial court granted defendant an out-of-time appeal pursuant to State v. Counterman , (La.
  • State v. Amison 235 So. 3d 1087 La. 2018
  • State ex rel. Payton v. State 235 So. 3d 1098 La. 2018
  • State v. Marenco 236 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    See State v. Counterman , , 338 (La.
  • State ex rel. Funchess v. State 229 So. 3d 457 La. 2017
  • State ex rel. Rainey v. State 228 So. 3d 193 La. 2017
  • State ex rel. Doucet v. State 228 So. 3d 199 La. 2017
  • State v. Jamison 222 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    On December 27, 2016, defendant filed a (La.
  • State v. Moore 215 So. 3d 951 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
    On August 27, 2015, the trial court dismissed Defendant’s (La.
  • State v. Engle 213 So. 3d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    On June 23, 2016, the trial court dismissed defendant’s (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel Brandon Prince -Aka- Daniel B. Prince La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    Defendant sought review of the trial court’s denial of his Motion for Out of Time Appeal, and on February 10, 2014, this court remanded the matter to the trial court for a
  • State v. Prince 211 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    Defendant sought review of the trial court’s denial of his Motion for Out of Time Appeal, and on February 10, 2014, this court remanded the matter to the trial court for a (La.
  • State v. Thomas 206 So. 3d 866 La. 2016
    art. 930.3 does not expressly provide for the specific form of relief to be granted when the defendant loses his constitutional right to appeal without fault on his part, the court arguably has the inherent authority to grant the limited relief of an out-of-time appeal,” (1985), defendant here did not lose his constitutional right to appeal.
  • State ex rel. Beechler v. State 205 So. 3d 909 La. 2016
  • State v. Johnson 203 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Brown 202 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Williams 199 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State ex rel. Robbins v. State 194 So. 3d 1105 La. 2016
  • State v. Hayes 190 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    ‘ On January 13, 2015, which was granted on January 15, 2015.
  • State v. Lindsey 189 So. 3d 1104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    However, given that the trial signed an order granting the appeal and the state did not complain of any procedural irregularities, dismissal of the appeal and a would only prolong the delay without serving any useful purpose.
  • State ex rel. Pierre v. State 183 So. 3d 1292 La. 2016
    Finally, relator fails to show that he pled guilty involuntarily and/
  • State ex rel. Green v. State 184 So. 3d 11 La. 2016
    Relator’s application is moot, This Court has already -instructed the district court to appoint counsel for the purpose of a
  • State ex rel. Glasper v. State 182 So. 3d 944 La. 2016
  • State ex rel. Russell v. State 180 So. 3d 1279 La. 2015
    Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95)
  • State ex rel. Reavis v. State 178 So. 3d 132 La. 2015
  • State v. Rome 176 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    State v. Jupiter, 05-869 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. Williams v. State 176 So. 3d 1034 La. 2015
    Unless he has already exercised his right to appeal, (La.
  • State v. Hayes 173 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    which was granted on January 15, 2015.
  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel B. Prince La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/10/14) (unpublished)
  • State v. Prince 173 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/10/14) (unpublished)
  • State ex rel. Green v. State 158 So. 3d 825 La. 2015
    The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for purposes of holding a (out-of-time appeal may be appropriate in cases in which either “the defendant was not substantially notified at sentencing of his right to appeal or those in which the defense attorney was at fault in failing to file or perfect a timely appeal.”).
  • State v. Russell 167 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Oliver 165 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Jupiter, 05-869 (La.App.
  • State v. Lagman 152 So. 3d 164 La. 2014
    (out-of-time appeal may be appropriate in cases in which “the defense attorney was at fault in failing to file or perfect a timely appeal.”).
  • State v. Murphy 131 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    7 Defendant sought an out-of-time appeal and, on October 8, 2012, and to appoint appellate counsel.
  • State v. Cobbs 119 So. 3d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Art. 914.” In writ 12-KH-30, this Court granted defendant’s application and transferred it back to the trial court for consideration as a
  • State v. Teston 109 So. 3d 452 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    On March 23, 2012, this court granted the writ application and remanded the matter to the trial court for further proceedings to determine whether the applicant should be granted an out-of-time appeal in accor *455
  • State ex rel. Murphy v. State 98 So. 3d 868 La. 2012
  • State v. Lee 99 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Thus, if defendant wished to appeal his conviction and sentence, within the time delays provided by LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State ex rel. Perez v. State 93 So. 3d 583 La. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Tyrone A. Murray La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Murray 92 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • Johnson v. Terrell 85 So. 3d 1278 La. 2012
  • Johnson v. Terrell 85 So. 3d 1278 La. 2012
  • State v. Williams 77 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    On August 11, 2010, defendant filed an Uniform Application for Post-Conviction Relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for counsel’s failure to file an appeal and requesting an out-of-time appeal