Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Perry, 502 So. 2d 543.

116 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jewel Demon Humphrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Koon, 96–1208 at p. 34, 704 So.2d at 776, –59 (La.1986), cert.
State of Louisiana v. Sedrick R. Tennessee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Darrione Kentrell Bell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Koon, 96-1208 at p. 34, 704 So.2d at 776, –59 (La.1986), cert.
State of Louisiana v. Eddie Ray Jackson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Koon, 96–1208 at p. 34, 704 So.2d at 16 776, –59 (La.1986), cert.
Diamond Fields and Gerald Sanford Versus Ochsner Medical Center - Kenner, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
Broaden, 99-2124 at 23, 780 So.2d at 364; -559 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
10/17/94), ); State v. Perry , –59 (La.
La. 2020
see also Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 106 S.Ct.
State Of Louisiana v. Kari Shisler & Joseph Dyczewski La. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Kari Shisler & Joseph Dyczewski La. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Woodrow Johnson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
However, “there must be an invasion of someone’s right[ ] to privacy before there can be an unreasonable search.” (La.
State v. Every 274 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Perry , , 558 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Miles J. Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Guidry 271 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Perry , , 558-559 (La.1986), cert.
State v. Dressner 255 So. 3d 537 La. 2018
See State v. Perry , , 563-64 (La.
State v. Young 245 So. 3d 353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Leger 236 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
192 , 151 L.Ed.2d 135 (2001) ; , 558-59 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Moultrie 224 So. 3d 349 La. 2017
Const. art. I, § 5 also presupposes that “there must be an invasion of someone’s rights to privacy before there can be an unreasonable search.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Farris 210 So. 3d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Const. Art. I, § 5, presupposes that “there must be an invasion of someone’s rights to privacy before there can be an unreasonable search,” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
State v. Freeman 194 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Const. Art. I, § 5, presupposes that “there must be an invasion of someone’s rights to privacy before there can be an unreasonable search.”
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Eric Vercher La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Vercher 162 So. 3d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State in the Interest of N. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
: whether the investigator discussed the case with police prior to the interview, whether the interview was conducted at the police’s request, and whether the primary purpose of the investigator’s visit was to elicit a confession while in cahoots with law enforcement.
State ex rel. N.F. 124 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Parker 124 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Matthew Thomas Conway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Conway 101 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
2595, 2606 , 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986); see also, -64 (La.1986) (LSA-Const.
State v. Davis 45 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Photographic evidence is admissible unless it is “so gruesome as to overwhelm the jurors’ reason and lead them to convict the defendant without sufficient evidence, i.e., when the prejudicial effect of the photographs substantially outweighs their probative value.” -559 (La.1986), cert.
State v. Jones 46 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991); cert.
State v. Jackson 42 So. 3d 368 La. 2010
However, Article I, § 5 presupposes that “there must be an invasion of someone’s rights to privacy before there can be an unreasonable search.”
State v. Johnson 47 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Photographic evidence is admissible unless it is “so gruesome as to overwhelm the jurors’ reason and lead them to convict the defendant without sufficient evidence, i.e., when the prejudicial effect of the photographs substantially outweighs their probative value.” Condley , 04-1349 at 18-19, 904 So.2d at 893 (-559 (La.1986), cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Jude Gilbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Gilbert 41 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Patterson 38 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
(“The Louisiana Constitution does not limit standing to challenge a search to those who live in the premises and thus have a reasonable expectation of privacy in it.”).
State v. Shelvin 34 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Jarvis Jermaine Shelvin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Bernard 31 So. 3d 1025 La. 2010
State v. Duhon 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Koon , 96-1208 at p. 34, 704 So.2d at 776 , -59 (La.1986), cert.
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), ; State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), ; State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98)
State v. Nix 987 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Koon, supra, -559 (La.1986).
State of Louisiana v. Nathan Stringer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Koon, supra, (-59 (La.1986), cert.
State v. Stringer 949 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Koon, supra , (-59 (La.1986), cert.
State v. Marley 945 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
The Louisiana Supreme *814 Court upheld searches in (1) where the police entered the defendant's house after receiving a call from a neighbor who reported (at the defendant's request) that the defendant's husband had been stabbed and (2) (La.
State v. Cuccia 933 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Koon, supra, -559 (La.1986).
State v. Condley 904 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005