DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc., 510 So. 2d 1366.

13 citing documents.

  • Gronlund v. Mike Donner, LLC 110 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc., (La.App.
  • Denise E. Gronlund v. Mike Donner, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc., (La.App.
  • Bruce A. Baker v. Mazda Motor of America La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    The term “defect” as contemplated by La.Civ.Code art. 2520 in a redhibitory action was discussed by this court in Harper v. Coleman Chrysler- Plymouth-Dodge, Inc., (La.App.
  • Baker v. Mazda Motor of America 856 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    The term “defect” as contemplated by La.Civ.Code art. 2520 in a redhibitory action was discussed by this court in Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc., (La.App.
  • Chastant v. Oasys Imaging, Inc. 839 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    This court discussed the meaning of “defect” in a redhibitory action in Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc., (La.App.
  • Miller v. Ford Motor Co. 815 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 12/6/95) , , writ denied, 96-0084 (La.3/8/96), , we said: In Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth Dodge, Inc., (La.
  • Meche v. Harvey, Inc. 664 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    Nevertheless, In Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc., we stated: To recover attorney's fees the buyer must prove knowledge of the defect by the seller.
  • Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc. 634 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    art. 2520; Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc., (La.App.
  • MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc. 603 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    4th Cir.1990); Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc., (La.App.
  • Beth Israel v. Bartley, Inc. 579 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth Dodge, Inc., (La.App.
  • Edmundson Bros. v. F.M. Carriere & Son, Inc. 552 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc., (La.App.
  • Reilly v. Gene Ducote Volkswagen, Inc. 549 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    5th Cir.1984); Harper v. Coleman Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc., (La.App.
  • Ward v. Kemp 539 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    art. 2545 provides as follows: “The seller, who knows the vice of the thing he sells and omits to declare it, besides the restitution of price and repayment of the expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, is answerable to the buyer in damages.” , at page 1370, (La.App.