Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Scott v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. No. 1, 496 So. 2d 270.

248 citing documents.

Everette Davis, Jr., Et Ux. v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
No. 1, we set forth the criteria used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Davis v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 78 So. 3d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
No. 1, we set forth the criteria used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Davis v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. 78 So. 3d 190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
No. 1, we set forth the criteria used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Active Solutions, L.L.C. v. Dell, Inc. 73 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
No. 1, in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Nancy Taylor v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
No. 1, we set forth the criteria used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Taylor v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 33 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dish No. 1, we set forth the criteria used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Melba Lee See v. Entergy Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Scott [v. Hospital Service District No. 1, ].
See v. Entergy Corp. 24 So. 3d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Scott [v. Hospital Service Distyict No. 1, ].
Betty Augustine, Et Vir. v. Safeco National Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Scott [v. Hospital Service District No. 1, ].
Augustine v. Safeco National Ins. Co. 18 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Scott [v. Hospital Service District No. 1, ].
Young v. US AUTOMOTIVE ASS'N CAS. CO. 15 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Young v. United States Automotive Ass'n Casualty Co. 15 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Charles, and in Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., set forth the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is proper: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could
Tina Smoot v. Ken Hernandez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
No. 1, ], i.e., could reasonable men in the exercise of impartial judgment differ as to the fact that the jury award was either abusively high or abusively low.
Smoot v. Hernandez 6 So. 3d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
No. 1, ], i.e., could reasonable men in the exercise of impartial judgment differ as to the fact that the jury award was either abusively high or abusively low.
King v. Brown Development, Inc. 4 So. 3d 231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Charles Parish, Mahmood, supra .
Boxie v. Lemoine 988 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
No. 1, we set forth the criteria used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Sharon Boxie v. Dr. Dwight Lemoine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
No. 1, we set forth the criteria used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Mahmood v. Cathey 981 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Charles Parish, Morehead v. Ford Motor Co., 29,399 (La.App.
MUNAR v. State Farm Ins. Co. 972 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1991); Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
Maria M. Munar v. State Farm Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
John E. Beard, Et Ux. v. Coregis Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
As outlined by the supreme court in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, JNOV is warranted when “the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the trial court believes that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary verdict[.]” Id.
Fox v. Layton 968 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Beard v. Coregis Ins. Co. 968 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
As outlined by the supreme court in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, JNOV is warranted when "the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the trial court believes that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary verdict[.]" Id.
Rose Dove Egle v. John M. Egle, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
No. 1, we set forth the criteria used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Egle v. Egle 963 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
No. 1, we set forth the criteria used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
Carey Davis v. Harrah's Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
829 (La.1991); Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
Davis v. HARRAH'S LAKE CHARLES, LLC 945 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
City of Baton Rouge v. Lee 950 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Harvin v. ANPAC Louisiana Ins. Co. 944 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Gerald W. Greer v. State of La., Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Greer v. State, ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 941 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Greer v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. 941 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Davis v. Lazarus 927 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
No. 1, Clayton v. State, Dept. Of Transp.
Charles Duchamp, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Duchamp v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 916 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Judson v. Davis 916 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In re New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation 903 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
On the other hand, if there is substantial evidence opposed to the motions, that is evidence of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair-minded men in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach Indifferent conclusions, the motion should be denied.” Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
Adams v. CSX Railroads 902 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
On the other hand, if there is substantial evidence opposed to the motions, that is evidence of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair-minded men in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions, the motion should be denied.” Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
Motton v. Lockheed Martin Corp. 900 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
No. 1, the Louisiana Supreme Court delineated the grounds warranting the granting of a JNOV.
RJ Messinger, Inc. v. Rosenblum 894 So. 2d 1113 La. 2005
Henderson v. ABC Insurance 895 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
Noran J. Robin, Jr., Et Ux. v. Allstate Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra.
Robin v. Allstate Indemnity Co. 889 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra.
Trunk v. Med. Center of La. at New Orleans 885 So. 2d 534 La. 2004
Torrejon v. Mobil Oil Co. 876 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Baudier v. Cheron 876 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra
Motorola, Inc. v. Associated Indem. Corp. 867 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
District No. 1, (La.App.
Tadlock v. Taylor 857 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
No. 1, the Court stated: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
Strange v. Shroff 850 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Doe v. Grant 839 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
No. 1, the Court stated: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.