DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Scott v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. No. 1, 496 So. 2d 270.

248 citing documents.

  • Glass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 832 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • Sturlese v. Six Chuter, Inc. 822 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • Bowie v. Young 813 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    No. 1, ], i.e., could reasonable men in the exercise of impartial judgment differ as to the fact that the jury award was either abusively high or abusively low.
  • Gunn v. Robertson 801 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra .
  • Dang v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. 798 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
  • Hazelwood Farm, Inc. v. Liberty Oil & Gas Corp. 790 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • Dufrene v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania 790 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    citing Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
  • Martin v. Heritage Manor South 784 So. 2d 627 La. 2001
    No. 1, we set forth the criteria used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
  • Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 784 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    STANDARD FOR JNOV In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the court set forth the law regulating this procedure as follows: In Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, we set forth the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
  • McCray v. J/H/J, INC. 769 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the criteria first set forth in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, (La.
  • Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc. 772 So. 2d 94 La. 2000
    No. 1, we set forth the criteria used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
  • Bowers v. Liuzza 769 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra.
  • Lombas v. Southern Foods, Inc. 760 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra.
  • Maltby v. Lyttle 758 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the court set forth the law regulating this procedure as follows: In Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, we set forth the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
  • Precht v. Case Corp. 756 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    *494 Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (citation omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the criteria first set forth in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, for determining whether a JNOV has been properly granted pursuant to La.Code Civ.P.
  • Hyatt v. Raggio 757 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Charles Parish, 7, supra.
  • Cortez v. Zurich Ins. Co. 752 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Matthews v. Arkla Lubricants Inc. 740 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Morehead v. Ford Motor Company, 29,399 (La.App.2d Cir.05/21/97), , writ denied, 97-1865 (La.11/07/97), ; (La.App.
  • James v. Beauregard Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 736 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    No. 1, -274 (La.1986) (quoting Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365, 374 (5 Cir.1969)), first examined the criteria to be used in determining when a directed verdict or JNOV is proper as follows: When the "facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the Court believes that reasonable m
  • Peterson v. Gibraltar Sav. and Loan 733 So. 2d 1198 La. 1999
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
  • Mustiful v. Strickland 732 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • LeBlanc v. Steptore 723 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • Smith v. Davill Petroleum Co., Inc. 744 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the criteria first set forth in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, (La.
  • Labit v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd. 721 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    See Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
  • STATE, DOTD v. August Christina & Bros., Inc. 716 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    No. 1, Clayton v. State, Dept. Of Transp.
  • Aultman v. Insurance Corp. of America 716 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Formose v. Trapani 710 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Orgeron v. Prescott, 93-926 (La.App.
  • DUPRE' v. Maison Blanche, Inc. 712 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    *570 For this reason, the Louisiana Supreme Court, in its opinion in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, (La.
  • Johnson v. Clark 710 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    The appellate court, in determining whether the trial court erred in granting the JNOV as to quantum, once again uses the criteria set forth in Scott [v. Hospital Service District No. 1, (La.
  • Warren v. Everist 706 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
  • Hy-Octane Investments, Ltd. v. G & B OIL PROD., INC. 702 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Daye v. General Motors Corp. 712 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    See, e.g., Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, [8] ; Willis v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., (La.App.
  • Cooper v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 699 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., our Supreme Court, citing Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, summarized the criteria to be used in determining whether a JNOV is proper.
  • Powell v. Regional Transit Authority 695 So. 2d 1326 La. 1997
  • Gallien v. Stapleton Corp. 692 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Morehead v. Ford Motor Co. 694 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Laing v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Kreher v. Semreh Club 694 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • Manville v. Citizen 689 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    In Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, we set forth the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
  • Adams v. Marathon Oil Co. 688 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra .
  • May v. Jones 675 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., citing Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, see also Gibson v. Bossier City General Hosp., supra.
  • Brungart v. K Mart Corp. 668 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    the supreme court reiterated the criteria first set forth in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, to be used in determining whether a JNOV has been properly granted pursuant to Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 1811: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contra
  • Ventress v. Union Pacific RR Co. 666 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    fixed the standard of review for JNOV's: In Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, we set forth the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • United Group of National Paper Distributors, Inc. v. Vinson 666 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Gibson, supra.
  • UNITED GROUP OF NATL. PAPER DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. Vinson 666 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Gibson, supra .
  • Oden v. Baroid Drilling Fluids, Inc. 665 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    No. 1, -274 (La.1986), citing Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969).
  • Tartar v. Hymes 656 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    Charles, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra .
  • Sledge v. Continental Cas. Co. 654 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Haydel v. Hercules Transport, Inc. 654 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Alleman v. Brownie Drilling Co. 647 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Scott [v. Hospital Service District No. 1,] supra [ ].
  • Barlow v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 645 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Scott [v. Hospital Service District No. 1], supra [ ].