Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roger v. Estate of Moulton, 513 So. 2d 1126.
- Ruiz v. Lewis 579 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
-
Provident Life and Acc. Ins. v. Turner
582 So. 2d 250
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
This interpretation of Article 3463
- Hicks v. Somers 577 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
-
Bennett v. Bruce
575 So. 2d 511
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
22:653, relating to the validity of non-complying forms, provides that any policy, rider or endorsement otherwise valid, but not in compliance with the insurance code, “shall be construed and applied in accordance with such conditions and provisions as would have applied had such policy, rider or endorsement been in full compliance with this Code.” the court held that: to effect a valid rejection of the UM coverage under La.R.S.
-
Henson v. Safeco Ins. Companies
569 So. 2d 191
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-1132 (La.1987), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed UM coverage and how to reject it as follows: In Louisiana, UM coverage is provided for by statute and embodies a strong public policy....
-
Bertrand v. Shelter General Ins. Co.
571 So. 2d 861
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the purpose and effect of UM coverage in the following terms: "In Louisiana, UM coverage is provided for by statute and embodies a strong public policy.
- Uhrich v. National Fire Ins. Co. 569 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- McLemore v. Fox 565 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
-
Smith v. Travelers Ins. Co.
560 So. 2d 472
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
*474 : In Louisiana, UM coverage is provided for by statute and embodies a strong public policy....
- Schwoch v. Sutor 559 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
Sharp v. Daigre
555 So. 2d 1361
La. 1990
Roger v. *1363 Estate of Moulton, (La.
-
Guilbeau v. Gabriel
553 So. 2d 1078
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
rehearing granted on other grounds, (La.1987), all of the cases relied on by plaintiff deal with the validity of a selection of lower limits.
- Comberrel v. Basford 550 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
-
Fay v. Willis
545 So. 2d 1296
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Moreover, the statute imposes UM coverage “notwithstanding the language of the policy, the intentions of the parties, or the presence or absence of a premium charge or payment.” rehearing granted on other grounds, (La.
- Kitchens v. Brown 545 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Sharp v. Daigre 545 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Logan v. Louisiana Dock Co., Inc.
541 So. 2d 182
La. 1989
(1987) (on rehearing), "a party may not seek to change the judgment below or any part thereof unless he has appealed or petitioned for review."
- Saffel v. Bamburg 540 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
-
Breshers v. DOTD, State of La.
536 So. 2d 733
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
In Roger v. Estate of Moulton, on rehearing, the plaintiff applied for and the Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari.
-
Bauer v. White
532 So. 2d 506
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Johnson v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, 425 So.
- Howes v. Doucet 531 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- Cavalier v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 528 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
Hebert v. Williams
526 So. 2d 835
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
The other cases cited by plaintiffs, (La.App.
-
State Ex Rel. Nicholas v. State
520 So. 2d 377
La. 1988
2158, 2159 , 48 L.Ed.2d 784, 786-787 (1976); -1137 (La.
-
Giroir v. Theriot
513 So. 2d 1166
La. 1987
rehearing granted on other grounds, (La.