Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roger v. Estate of Moulton, 513 So. 2d 1126.

175 citing documents.

Deville v. Allstate Ins. Co. 688 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Cangelosi v. Allstate Ins. Co. 680 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Haney v. Zurich Ins. Co. 680 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Henson, 585 So.2d at 538 ; (La.
Gordon v. Southern United Fire Ins. Co. 679 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Pine v. Doolittle 677 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Johnson v. Allstate Ins. Co. 673 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
the supreme court stated for a rejection to be valid pursuant to La.R.S.
Russo v. Reed 673 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Tijerina v. Stawecki 670 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Oyefodun v. Spears 669 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Fontenot v. Henderson 670 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
The insurer has a duty to place the insured in a position to make an informed rejection of UM coverage.
Degruise v. Houma Courier Newspaper Corp. 694 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
[4] the intervenor, in its capacity as the worker's compensation insurer, renewed its claim to be reimbursed for compensation benefits it paid to the injured worker out of any judgment he obtained from the UM insurer for the injured worker's employer.
Hobbs v. Rhodes 667 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Taylor v. Meynard 665 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
“ wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court was presented with the issue of whether a Liberty Mutual insurance policy, which |4covered a United Parcel Service truck driven by plaintiff, provided uninsured motorist coverage for a UPS motor vehicle registered and principally garaged within Louisiana pursuant to the t
Perkins v. Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. 667 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Adams v. Dupree 663 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Plaintiff cites Hebert v. Cournoyer Oldsmobile-Cadillac GMC, Inc., (La.App.
Batiste v. Big D Dirt Service 663 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
| «This interpretation of La.Civ.Code art. 3519 (now art. 3463) in which the supreme court again found that the last sentence of Article 3463 does not apply after the defendant has made a general appearance.
Degruise v. Houma Courier Newspaper Corp. 657 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Partin v. Dolby 652 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
CHOICE OF LAW In denying Allstate's motion for summary judgment, the trial court found that Louisiana's strong interest in requiring UM coverage on vehicles registered, garaged, and licensed in Louisiana dictated the application of Louisiana law to Allstate's policy
Carter v. Baham 649 So. 2d 967 La. 1995
Esponge v. City of New Orleans 650 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
The insurer has a duty to place the insured in a position to make an informed rejection of UM coverage.
Chevalier v. Ream 649 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
: In Louisiana, UM coverage is provided for by statute and embodies a strong public policy.
Anderson v. Allstate Ins. Co. 642 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
South Cent. Bell v. Ka-Jon Food Stores 644 So. 2d 357 La. 1994
Holbrook v. Holliday 640 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Washington v. Savoie 634 So. 2d 1176 La. 1994
this court articulated further requirements for a valid waiver of UM coverage, specifying that "the insured or his authorized representative must expressly set forth in a single document that UM coverage is rejected in the State of Louisiana as of a specific date in a particular policy issued or to be
Faucheaux v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. 633 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Segura v. Frank 630 So. 2d 714 La. 1994
Futch v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 625 So. 2d 1019 La. 1994
Reeves v. Allstate Ins. Co. 619 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
However, is controlling.
Dibos v. Bill Watson Ford, Inc. 622 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
La. Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London 616 So. 2d 1250 La. 1993
Cryer v. Tenneco Oil Company 615 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Alford v. Woods 614 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
I question whether there was a valid rejection of the National Fire and Marine UM coverage, and Henson v. Safeco Ins.
Beckham v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 614 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
the plaintiff, Donald Roger ("Roger"), was injured in an automobile accident and filed suit against the alleged tortfeasors and their insurers.
Mosley v. Dairyland Ins. Co. 614 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Thibodeaux v. Champion Ins. Co. 614 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Bradley v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 613 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
This interpretation of article 3463
HOUSTON GEN. INS. CO. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 612 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co. 609 So. 2d 195 La. 1992
Henson, 585 So.2d at 538
Saffel v. US Indem. Assur. Group, Inc. 609 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1985), writ denied
Washington v. Savoie 607 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Young v. Shelter Ins. Co. 604 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
RPM Pizza, Inc. v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 601 So. 2d 1366 La. 1992
Donaghey v. Cumis Ins. Soc. 600 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Our Supreme Court, explained the reasons for the statute's existence: In Louisiana, UM coverage is provided for by statute and embodies a strong public policy.
Fontenot v. Champion Ins. Co. 597 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the requirements to effect a valid rejection of UM coverage, as follows: "In order to have a valid rejection, the rejection must be in writing, and signed by the `named insured' or his `legal representative.'
Parker v. Southern American Ins. Co. 590 So. 2d 55 La. 1991
Mercola v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 588 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Henson v. Safeco Ins. Companies 585 So. 2d 534 La. 1991
for a valid rejection of UM coverage, since the document established that the insured had expressly rejected coverage in a single document as of a specific date and as to a particular policy.
Bays v. Estate of Zeringue 584 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Roger v. Estate of Moulton, *721
Kahn v. Dufrene 587 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
involved a letter offered as a waiver of UM coverage.