Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roger v. Estate of Moulton, 513 So. 2d 1126.

175 citing documents.

Police Jury of Calcasieu Parish v. Indian Harbor Insurance Co. La. 2024
Brian Barbera Versus Alexander Andrade, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Geico Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Johnny Carval Havard v. Ricky Jeanlouis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Duncan, 950 So.2d at 547 (emphasis added) (-32 (La.1987).
Charles Higgins v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company La. 2021
Cutsinger, p. 6, 12 So.3d at 949; Duncan, p. 4, 950 So.2d at 547
Darius Troy Barras and Julie A. Barras v. Cardinal Services, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
/d. at 949-50 (citing Taylor v. Rowell, 98-2865 (La.5/18/99), ).
Justin Crowley v. Goauto Insurance Company, Brionne L. Myles, and Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Aaron Allen Stall v. Mercury Ins. Co. of Florida La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Any exclusion from coverage in an insurance policy must be clear and unmistakable.”
Stall v. Mercury Ins. Co. of Fla. 237 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Roger v. Estate of Moulton , , 1130 (La.1987).
Orellana v. Doe 215 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Lonny Hayes v. Viviana Trevino De Barton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Kimberly and Todd Thibodeaux, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Child, Gabrielle Thibodeaux v. James F. Donnell, … 219 So. 3d 274 La. 2017
(on reh=g) (AA party who is satisfied with a judgment, and who does not file a notice of appeal or a petition for review, is, nevertheless, a party to the appeal or review whose arguments must be heard, and in support of the judgment in his favor he may present any argument supported by the record, whether i
Tracie F. v. Francisco D. 188 So. 3d 231 La. 2016
Chauncy v. Allen 191 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Penton v. Castellano 169 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
The claims of the employee and the employer’s compensation insurer arise from “the same cause of action.”
Frank Tuson v. Merlyn Rodgers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
verage shall be made only on a form prescribed by the commissioner of 4 insurance” and that “[a] properly completed and signed form creates a rebuttable presumption that the insured knowingly rejected [UMBI] coverage, selected a lower limit, or selected economic-only coverage.” In Duncan, 950 So.2d at 547 (), the supreme court observed that strong public policy is embodied in the UMBI coverage statute and that the statute is to be liberally construed, which “requires the statutory exceptions to
Tuson v. Rodgers 165 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
of lower limits, or selection of economic-only coverage shall be made only on a form prescribed by the commissioner of | ^insurance” and that “[a] properly completed and signed form creates a *462 rebuttable presumption that the insured knowingly rejected [UMBI] coverage, selected a lower limit, or selected economic-only coverage.” In Duncan, 950 So.2d at 547 (), the supreme court observed that strong public policy is embodied in the UMBI coverage statute and that the statute is to be liberally
Naddia Melder, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
embodies a strong public policy.”
Melder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 162 So. 3d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Green v. Johnson 149 So. 3d 766 La. 2014
12/8/95), -92 (per curiam); (on rehearing).
Ashanti Green, as Tutrix of the Minors, Dave Peterson III and David Peterson v. Michael Johnson, State Farm … La. 2014
12/8/95), -92 (per curiam); (La.
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Myers 145 So. 3d 320 La. 2014
Louisiana Office of Risk Management v. Richard 125 So. 3d 398 La. 2013
See Logan v. Louisiana Dock Co., Inc., (on rehearing).
Michael P. Tyler v. Joseph Dejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
at 949-50 (citing Taylor v. Rowell, 98-2865 (La.5/18/99), ).
Tyler v. Dejean 121 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
at 949-50 (citing Taylor v. Rowell, 98-2865 (La.5/18/99), ; ).
Granger v. Christus Health Central Louisiana 144 So. 3d 736 La. 2013
Bernard Police Jury v. Muría, 2000-0132 (La.6/30/00)
St. Pierre v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. 102 So. 3d 1003 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
(defendant insurer sued as defendant’s uninsured motorist carrier was allowed to intervene for reimbursement of workers’ compensation benefits it paid in its separate capacity as plaintiffs workers’ compensation carrier); (La.App.
Sims v. American Insurance Co. 101 So. 3d 1 La. 2012
Subsequent to Levy v. Stelly, this Court decided two other relevant cases, Hebert v. Cournoyer Oldsmobile-Cadillac GMC, Inc., each holding that Article 3463’s provision that “[i]nterruption is considered never to have occurred if the plaintiff abandons, voluntarily dismisses or fails to prosecute the suit at the trial,” only applies where the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the first suit prior to the defendant making a general ap
Bernard v. Ellis 111 So. 3d 995 La. 2012
at 949-50 (citing Taylor v. Rowell, 98-2865 (La.5/18/99), ; ).
Bernard v. Ellis 76 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
Naddia Melder, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile ins.co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Melder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 66 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Insurance Co.], 06-363 [ (La.11/29/06) ], ( A.I.U.
Burmaster v. Plaquemines Parish Government 64 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
An insurer must expressly and specifically exclude a particular loss or claim from coverage, so that “ ‘[a]ny exclusion from coverage in an insurance policy [is] clear and unmistakable.’ ”
Ware v. Gemini Insurance Co. 51 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Bordelon v. Western Heritage Insurance Co. 48 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Mednick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 31 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Burns v. Hetler, 02-1733 (La.App.
Alvarez v. LeBlanc 31 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Keen v. Ashley 21 So. 3d 987 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
The Keens argued the older jurisprudence requiring the strictest construction of UM waivers, to the six-point checklist in Duncan v. USAA Ins.
Cutsinger v. Redfern 12 So. 3d 945 La. 2009
Taylor v. Rowell *950 98-2865, p. 5 (La.5/18/99)
National Interstate Insurance v. Collins 9 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Theodore E. Filipski, III v. Imperial Fire and Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Filipski v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance 9 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Banquer v. Guidroz 5 So. 3d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
To the extent that identification of the signature is not set forth, as provided, in the single UM waiver document, the submission of Mr. Ferguson's affidavit wherein he attests that he is the authorized legal representative of "Halliburton Energy Services, Inc" cannot be accepted to identify his signature on the UM waiver form.
Diane Edden v. Jody Ortego, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Edden v. Ortego 999 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Carla Ann Gingles v. Kinnery Dardenne La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Gingles v. Dardenne 998 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Grace R. Harper v. Direct General Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Harper v. DIRECT GENERAL INS. CO. OF LA. 998 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Johnson v. Folse 986 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Julia A. Rashall v. Charles K. Pennington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
“In Louisiana, UM coverage is provided for by statute and embodies a strong public policy.”