Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mussall, 523 So. 2d 1305.

1462 citing documents.

State v. Jones 229 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311 ; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658 ; (La.
State of Louisiana v. Joseph McKinley Guillory AKA Joseph Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State v. Guillory 229 So. 3d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining' the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State of Louisiana v. Leslie C. Thompson La. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Timothy Eugene Dowden, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
An appellate court may, however, impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.”
State v. Dowden 224 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
An appellate court may, however, impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent nec.essary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.” (La.
State v. Mahogany 225 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Explained State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee 223 So. 3d 1136 La. 2017
State v. Campos 224 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Golden 223 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Corlious C. Dyson AKA Corlious Corall Dyson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Dyson 220 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel McCoy, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
State v. McCoy 219 So. 3d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Weary , 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311 ; Neal , 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658 ; (La.
State of Louisiana v. Martin G. Lemoine 222 So. 3d 688 La. 2017
State v. Green 220 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Gary D. Howard 226 So. 3d 419 La. 2017
Nevertheless, “‘the jury cannot be permitted to speculate if the evidence is such that reasonable jurors must have a reasonable doubt.’” [quoting 2 C. Wright, Federal Practice & Procedure, Criminal 2d § 467 (2d ed. 1982)].
State v. Brown 223 So. 3d 88 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Neal 219 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Wilson 220 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Becnel 220 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Joshua X. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Griffin 217 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Dickerson 218 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Christopher O. James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State of Louisiana v. Stormy Nicole Cofer AKA Stormy Cofer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State of Louisiana v. Ernest Ray Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State of Louisiana v. Elsa Rangel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
A reviewing court may intrude on the plenary discretion of the fact finder “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.” (footnote and citation omitted).
State v. Williams 216 So. 3d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Cofer 216 So. 3d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of •witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State v. De Gruy 215 So. 3d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. James 216 So. 3d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State v. Jones 214 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Armstead , at p. 12, 159 So.3d at 512 .
State of Louisiana v. Timothy Aaron Dangerfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Dangerfield 214 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Luzzo 214 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Joenell Rubin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
The appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.”
State v. Rubin 211 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Id, The appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.” (La.
State v. Breedlove 213 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Tedrick Jewan Richardson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State of Louisiana v. Kerry Bertrand La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Richardson 210 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Bertrand 209 So. 3d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Dunn 208 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Hoang 207 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Lacaze 208 So. 3d 856 La. 2016
State v. Castro 206 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Heard 208 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Explained State of Louisiana v. Rodricus C. Crawford 218 So. 3d 13 La. 2016