Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mussall, 523 So. 2d 1305.

1462 citing documents.

State v. Harrell 258 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Clark , 220 So.3d at 626 ; State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.
State v. Carter 257 So. 3d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Henry 256 So. 3d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Matthew R. Dotson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
(generally, one witness’s positive identification is sufficient to support the conviction); State v. Ford, 28,724 (La.App.2d Cir.10/30/96), -50, writ denied, 99-0210 (La.5/14/99)
State of Louisiana v. Kade Starbuck Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Our supreme court has stated: However, an appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
State v. Dotson 257 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Mussall , , 1311 (La.1988) (generally, one witness's positive identification is sufficient to support the conviction); State v. Ford , 28,724 (La.App.2d Cir.10/30/96), , 849-50, writ denied , 99-0210 (La.5/14/99), ....
State ex rel. D.J.S. 255 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/29/06), , 660 ; and State v. Mussall , , 1308-09 (La.
State in the Interest of D.J.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Kevin James Alexander -Aka- Kevin J. Alexander -Aka- James K. Alexander -Aka- Kevin Alexander, … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. George E. Byrd AKA George Byrd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Dirk Douglas Thomas AKA Dirk Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Alexander 256 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Mussall , , 1309 (La.1988).
State v. Thomas 255 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ; State v. Mussall
State v. Mollerberg 260 So. 3d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/29/06), , 660 ; State v. Mussall , , 1308-09 (La.
State v. Brooks 258 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/29/06), , 660 ; , 1308-09 (La.
State v. Irvin 259 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/29/06), , 660 ; , 1308-09 (La.
State v. Livous 259 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
art. 821B; State v. Mussall , , 1308-09 (La.
State v. Folse 258 So. 3d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/27/16), --- So.3d ----, ----, 2016 WL 314814 (per curiam); State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.
State v. Folse 258 So. 3d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/27/16), --- So.3d ----, ----, 2016 WL 314814 (per curiam); State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Brian Douglas Horn 251 So. 3d 1069 La. 2018
State ex rel. W.S. 250 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Sandifer 249 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Becnel 250 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/20/03), , 713 (citing State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Aaron Orlando Richards -Aka- Aaron Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
The appellate court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of 9 witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.”
State v. Richards 247 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.1988).
State v. Dufrene 251 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/29/06), , 660 ; State v. Mussall , , 1308-09 (La.
State v. Pruitt 245 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.1988).
State of Louisiana v. Jackie Lynn Pruitt AKA Jackie L. Pruitt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
An appellate court may impinge on the factfinder’s discretion and its role in determining the credibility of witnesses “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of the law.”
State v. Contreras 247 So. 3d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.
State ex rel. Wynne v. State 242 So. 3d 1223 La. 2018
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ; State v. Mussall , (La.
Explained State of Louisiana v. Billy Ray Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 12/3/97), , 228 (citing State v. Mussall , (La.
State v. Nixon 250 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/29/06), , 660 ; State v. Mussall , , 1308-09 (La.
State v. Trung Le 243 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/20/03), , 929 (quoting State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.1988) ).
State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Christopher Obrien AKA Jermaine Christopher O'Brien La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
10 only impinge on the jury’s discretion “to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.”
State v. Obrien 242 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Mussall , , 1310 (La.1988).
State of Louisiana v. Tanya Buteaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Buteaux 241 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Kentrell D. McElroy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Weary, 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658
State v. McElroy 241 So. 3d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Weary , 03-3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311 ; Neal , 00-0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658 ; State v. Mussall , , 1311 (La.1988).
State v. Martin 243 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/29/06), , 660 ; State v. Mussall , , 1308-09 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Darryl Jones La. 2018
Nevertheless, the Jackson standard does not permit jurors “‘to speculate if the evidence is such that reasonable jurors must have a reasonable doubt.’” (quoting 2 C. Wright, Federal Practice & Procedure, Criminal 2d § 467 at 660–61 and n.23 (2d ed. 1982).
State ex rel. H.J. 238 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Michael Kees La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Vail 236 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Cousin 240 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/29/06), , 660 ; State v. Mussall , , 1308-1309 (La.
State v. Banks 240 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/29/06), , 660 ; State v. Mussall , , 1308-09 (La.
State v. Leger 236 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/29/06), , 660 ; , 1308-09 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Patrick Seth Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Weary, 03–3067 at p. 18, 931 So.2d at 311; Neal, 00– 0674 at p. 11, 796 So.2d at 658

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by