Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co., 536 So. 2d 417.

149 citing documents.

Kelly Arnold v. ANPAC Louisiana Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
Nixon R. Calix Versus Ideal Market 6, Hamdallah, L.L.C., Kaki and Son, Llc., Hamdallah Hasan "Mario" Kaki, Muwafak … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Cox, Cox, Filo, Camel & Wilson, Llc v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corporation La. 2022
Calvin Landry & Mary Landry v. Progressive La. 2022
Cox, Cox, Filo, Camel & Wilson, LLP v. Louisiana Worker's Comp. Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Co., (emphasis added) (citations omitted).
Charles J. Champagne, Jr. and Kerrie S. Champagne v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Beverly Smith v. Citadel Insurance Company as Successor to Gramercy Insurance Company and Goauto Insurance Company La. 2019
Harold Fils v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Forrest v. Ville St. John Owners Ass'n, Inc. 259 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Fils v. Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. 263 So. 3d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Danny Kelly v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company 169 So. 3d 328 La. 2015
Thomas v. Miller 159 So. 3d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Espinosa v. Accor North America, Inc. 148 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
ettlements or expenses for the coverage provided by this form.” When “a policy has a provision that the insurer’s duty to defend the insured ends upon the exhaustion of the policy l^limit ..., then that policy provision must be enforced, and the insurer’s duty to defend ends upon exhaustion of the policy limit.” Howell, 96-0694, pp. 15-16, 691 So.2d at 726
Goldman v. Doe 113 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Haun v. Cusimano Inc. 86 So. 3d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Andrew Richard v. Robert Brasseaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Co., see La.Civ.Code art. 2046.
Richard v. Brasseaux 50 So. 3d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., see La.Civ.Code art. 2046.
Haddad v. Elkhateeb 46 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Anderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 42 So. 3d 1140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Thomas Allen v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Allen v. Allstate Insurance Co. 10 So. 3d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 10 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
the supreme court also emphasized that “[a]n insurer which hastily enters a questionable settlement [for its policy limits] simply to avoid further defense obligations under the policy clearly is not acting in good faith and may be held liable for damages [for an excess judgment] caused to its insured.” Id.
Stacey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 32 So. 3d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Subervielle v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 995 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Adams v. Frost 990 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Hebert v. Webre 982 So. 2d 770 La. 2008
Diggs v. Tillman 985 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Sandra Kay Bergstedt v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Mark Landry v. Louisiana Citizens Property Ins. Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
As noted in Watts, (citations omitted), as follows: There are certain elementary legal principles which apply to the interpreting of insurance policies.
Landry v. Louisiana Citizens Prop. Ins. Co. 964 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
As noted in Watts, , (La.
Samuels v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 939 So. 2d 1235 La. 2006
New South Federal Savings Bank v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
New South Fed. Bank v. Commonwealth Ins. 940 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hill v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 935 So. 2d 691 La. 2006
Co., see La.Civ.Code art. 2046.
LeBlanc v. Aysenne 921 So. 2d 85 La. 2006
Winn v. Nation 893 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Michael R. Fontenot v. Kipp L. Duplechine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Ledbetter, supra, citing
Fontenot v. Duplechine 891 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Ledbetter, supra, citing
Bryant v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 881 So. 2d 1214 La. 2004
Bryant v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASS'N 881 So. 2d 1214 La. 2004
Davis v. Counts 880 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Co., Cole-Gill v. Moore, 37-976 (La.
Gray Ins. Co. v. Old Tyme Builders, Inc. 878 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co., see La.Civ.Code art.2046.
Cole-Gill v. Moore 862 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Thiels v. AMERICAN INTERN. SOUTH INS. CO. 861 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Co., see La.Civ.Code art.2046.
Charles Thiels v. American International South Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Co., see La.Civ.Code art. 2046.
Wallace v. First Assur. Life of America 862 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Clarendon Nat. Ins. v. Jeansonne & Remondet 859 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Freeman v. Philan 859 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Co., , 420 421 (La.1988).
Calvin v. Janbar Enterprises, Inc. 856 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Wickramasekra v. ASSOC. INTERN. INS. CO. 890 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003