DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fowler v. Roberts, 556 So. 2d 1.

226 citing documents.

  • Peterson v. City of Tallulah 981 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • Talton v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 981 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co., Inc., 96-1932, pp. 8-9 (La.3/4/98), (citing David W. Robertson et al., Cases and Materials on Torts 83-84 (1989); (on original hearing)).
  • Anderson v. Anderson 980 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    -16 (La.1989), the Louisiana Supreme Court defined discretionary for purposes of governmental immunity.
  • John E. Beard, Et Ux. v. Coregis Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    In 4 support of this contention
  • Beard v. Coregis Ins. Co. 968 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    In support of this contention
  • Brown v. ANA Ins. Group 965 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Patrick v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 957 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • Webster v. Ballard 961 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    2 Cir.1988), writ granted, , writ denied, , aff'd, (holding that medical bills for plaintiff's treatment were not inadmissible hearsay, but were evidence of medical expenses incurred for treatment); (La.App.
  • Jones v. Gaines 953 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • Detraz v. Lee 950 So. 2d 557 La. 2007
    the appellate panel found that causation was one of the five elements of negligence, thus is was counterintuitive for the jury to find negligence but no causation.
  • Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 946 So. 2d 144 La. 2006
    Perkins v. Entergy Corporation, 00-1372, 00-1387, 00-1440, p. 7 (La.3/23/01), ; on reh'g, 556 So.2d at 13 (La.
  • Andry v. Murphy Oil, USA, Inc. 935 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co., Inc., 96-1932, pp. 8-9 (La.3/4/98), ( citing David W. Robertson et al., Cases and Materials on Torts 83-84 (1989); (on original hearing)).
  • Carl Harris Hesse v. Champ Service Line La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Hesse v. CHAMP SERVICE LINE 933 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94)
  • Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc. 923 So. 2d 627 La. 2006
    reh'g granted on other grounds and original opinion reinstated as supplemented, 556 So.2d at 13 (La.1990).
  • Cowan v. Jack 922 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466 (La.5/10/96), (Lemmon, J., concurring).
  • Michelle Detraz v. Victor Lee D/B/A Virgin Nails La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    LAW AND DISCUSSION The Louisiana Supreme Court delineated the standard for assessing liability for damages caused by a party’s
  • Detraz v. Lee 900 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    LAW AND DISCUSSION The Louisiana Supreme Court delineated the standard for assessing liability for damages caused by a
  • Ginger McIntosh, Indiv. v. Wayne F. McElveen, Sheriff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    and its progeny are flawed because Fowler “went to federal jurisprudence to interpret a dissimilar Louisiana statute to reach the conclusion that the immunity provided for in the Louisiana statute only exists when there is a discretionary act or function ‘grounded in social, economic or political policy.’”
  • McIntosh v. McElveen 893 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    and its progeny are flawed because Fowler "went to federal jurisprudence to interpret a dissimilar Louisiana statute to reach the conclusion that the immunity provided for in the Louisiana statute only exists when there is a discretionary act or function ` grounded in social, economic or political policy.
  • Waring v. Travelers Insurance Co. 891 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    -5 (La.1990), the Supreme Court stated: The determination of liability in a negligence case usually requires proof of five separate elements: (1) proof that the defendant had a duty to conform his conduct to a specific standard (the duty element); (2) proof that the defendant’s conduct failed to conform to the appro
  • Bonin v. Ferrellgas, Inc. 877 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), ; Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co., Inc., 96-1932 (La.3/4/98), (citing David W. Robertson, et al., Cases and Materials on Torts, 83-84 (1989); (on original hearing)).
  • Smith v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Dept. 874 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    she argues that the trial court's interpretation of La.R.S.
  • Susan Smith v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    she argues that the trial court’s interpretation of La.R.S.
  • Young v. Fitzpatrick 865 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co., Inc., 96-1932, pp. 8-9 (La.3/4/98), (citing David W. Robertson et al., Cases and Materials on Torts 83-84 (1989); (on original hearing)).
  • Cornelia E. Young v. Kevin Fitzpatrick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co., Inc., 96-1932, pp. 8-9 (La.3/4/98), (citing David W. Robertson et al., Cases and Materials on Torts 83-84 (1989); (on original hearing)).
  • Shelby Schweitzer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Schweitzer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 861 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Faulkner v. McCarty Corp. 853 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Although the validity of the Public Duty Doctrine has remained somewhat speculative in the lower courts, rejected the doctrine.
  • Gregor v. Argenot Great Cent. Ins. Co. 851 So. 2d 959 La. 2003
    9:2798.1 and its progeny.
  • Tasker v. City of New Orleans 834 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), , and the application of the duty-risk analysis, rather than the public duty doctrine, to claims brought against employees of public entities.
  • Saine v. City of Scott 819 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    on rehearing; see also Rick v. State, Dept. of Transp.
  • Cornish v. Doctors Care, LLC 819 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • Saine v. City of Scott 819 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Thus, “[t]he exception protects the government from liability only at the policy making or ministerial level, not at the operational level.” on rehearing; see also Rick v. State, Dept. of Transp.
  • Haydin v. Crescent Guardian, Inc. 818 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    This flaw illustrates a common confusion, | between the duty inquiry and the scope of protection (or scope of liability) inquiry.
  • Row v. Pierremont Plaza, LLC 814 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust Company 816 So. 2d 270 La. 2002
    1991), on rehearing, 605 So.2d at 1050, 1051 (La.1991); on rehearing, 556 So.2d at 13 (La.1989); Thomas C. Galligan, Jr., A Primer on the Patterns of Negligence, 53 La.L.Rev.
  • Rosen v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 809 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Fowler v. Roberts, supra [ ](holding on rehearing that La.
  • Gray v. Cannon 807 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    -5 (La.1989); Cunningham v. Northland Insurance Company, 00-888, at 9 (La.App.
  • Criticized Misuraca v. City of Kenner 802 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • Jackson v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Corrs. 785 So. 2d 803 La. 2001
  • Hayes v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 798 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    the court found the DPS liable for its drivers licensing agency.
  • Boutin v. Perrin 796 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Perkins v. Entergy Corp. 782 So. 2d 606 La. 2001
    Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co., Inc., 96-1932, pp. 8-9 (La.3/4/98), (citing David W. Robertson et al., Cases and Materials on Torts 83-84 (1989); (on original hearing)).
  • Fleniken v. Entergy Corp. 780 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Snearl v. Mercer 780 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Cay v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 93-0887, p. 5 (La.1/14/94), -96 ; see also, -6 (La.1989).
  • Gleason v. Nuco, Inc. 774 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • Griffin v. Kmart Corp. 776 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • Nunez v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 774 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • Cunningham v. Northland Insurance Co. 769 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000