Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fowler v. Roberts, 556 So. 2d 1.

226 citing documents.

Sommer v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. DEVELOPMENT 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Gravois v. Delta Airlines, Inc. 797 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Perkins v. Entergy Corp. 756 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Sommer v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
LeBlanc v. Stevenson 756 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Criticized Hardy v. Bowie 744 So. 2d 606 La. 1999
Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 745 So. 2d 1 La. 1999
Although the validity of the Public Duty Doctrine has remained somewhat speculative in the lower courts, rejected the doctrine.
Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank 738 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Seaman v. Howard 743 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 738 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Butcher v. City of Monroe 737 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94)
Guillie v. COMPREHENSIVE ADDICT. PROGRAM 735 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Rance v. Harrison Co., Inc. 737 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Cates v. Beauregard Electric Co-op., Inc., Miller v. Coastal Corporation, 93-1073 (La.
Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc. 725 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Sportsman Store v. SONITROL SEC. SYSTEMS 725 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Hardy v. Bowie 719 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Banks v. State Farm Ins. Co. 717 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94)
Porteous v. St. Ann's Cafe & Deli 713 So. 2d 454 La. 1998
(on rehearing) ( (on original hearing)).
Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 716 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
the Louisiana Supreme Court found that discretion exists only when a policy judgment has been made and that judicial interference in executive actions involving public policy is restrained by the discretionary acts exception.
Crockett v. Cardona 713 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Furthermore, elaborated on the need to determine the scope of protection when deciding if there is legal cause.
Swinford v. Dolphin Construction Co. 716 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Jurisprudence has held, that “cause-in-fact is usually a ‘but for’ inquiry which test whether the injuries would not have occurred but for the defendant’s substandard conduct.”
Brown v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 715 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co., Inc. 707 So. 2d 1225 La. 1998
David W. Robertson et al., Cases and Materials on Torts 83-84 (1989); (on original hearing).
Clark v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 716 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Clark v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 716 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Rambo v. Walker 704 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Manuel v. City of Jeanerette 702 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Stroik v. Ponseti 699 So. 2d 1072 La. 1997
Faucheaux, 615 So.2d at 292 ().
Alpha Alpha, Inc. v. Southland Aviation 697 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
there is a difference between exercising discretion and abdicating responsibility.
Williams v. Galliano 697 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
(on rehearing) (citing Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct.
Douglass v. Alton Ochsner Med. Found. 696 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Syrie v. Schilhab 693 So. 2d 1173 La. 1997
Frank L. Maraist & Thomas C. Galligan, Jr., Louisiana Tort Law §§ 4.2, 4.3 (1996).
Gagliano v. Amax Metals Recovery, Inc. 693 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Keys v. Broussard 692 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Francisco v. Joan of Arc Co. 692 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Demery v. Housing Auth. of New Orleans 689 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Stroik v. Ponseti 683 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Daigrepont v. State 688 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
More specifically, and White v. State of Louisiana, 93-2034 (La.App.
Varnado v. Department of Employment and Training 687 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-53 (La.1993); (on rehearing); Christian v. Fontenot, 672 So.2d at 444 .
Rhodes v. State Through DOTD 684 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
See Campbell v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development, 94-1052 p. 5 (La.1/17/95), ; Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corporation, 94-0952 pp. 4-5 (La.11/30/94), ; Roberts *1141 v. Benoit, on rehearing, reh.
Boguille v. Chambers 685 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Nicholson v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 685 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Wilson v. Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections, reh.
Ardoin v. City of Mamou 685 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Hayes v. City of Baton Rouge 683 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Gray v. Economy Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 682 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94)
Bustamente v. JEFFERSON PARISH INSP. 683 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
art. 2315; Cahoon v. USAA Casualty Ins.
Ducote v. City of Alexandria 677 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Thornhill v. STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. 676 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
White v. City of Baker 676 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Christian v. Fontenot 672 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996