Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Augustine, 555 So. 2d 1331.

179 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Alfred C. Simmons La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. Kelton L. Johnson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Nevertheless, - 34 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. BJ McElveen La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Ladarrius Hodge La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Tyrail Levare Tate La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Randall K. Sturdivant La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Percy Stalls La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
P. art. 873' s 24- hour sentencing delay after a post -trial motion, this Court has sometimes found the error to be harmless because the defendant could not show he suffered prejudice from the error and did not challenge his sentence on appeal, - 34 ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Michael T. Robinson Denzel West Kirk Powell La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Reshon Harper La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Dashone Reynolds La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Zackery Shane Deville A/K/A Zackery Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Christy Leanna Steiner La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Nevertheless, in State a Augustine, - 34 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Jordan Cyprian La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Nevertheless, in - 34 ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Freddy Lee Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Michael Trenzell Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
The panel further stated on the issue: [T]his court, recognized the failure to follow the mandatory delays for sentencing provided in La.Code Crim.
State of Louisiana Versus Shineda N. Taylor La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
02/05/90), State v. Colbert, 04-538 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Gregory Scott Stafford La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Frederick Curtis Mangrum La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Darrell T. Brown La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Nevertheless, - 1334 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Terance Roshell Dawson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Nevertheless, - 34 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Ricky Guidry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Jimmie J Jenkins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Sentencing a defendant within the twenty-four hour period is grounds to void the sentence “if the defendant challenges the sentence.” -1334 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Ricky Armentor La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Nevertheless, - 34 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Thomas Henry Logan La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Vernon Holden A/K/A Vernon Demtrius Holden, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Dolan McGinnis La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Fitzpatrick P. Williams La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Nevertheless, - 34 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher James Landry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Nevertheless, - 34 ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Michael Jerome Cochran A/K/A Michael Jerome Cochran, Jr. A/K/A Michael Cochran La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 6/26/96), this court, recognized the failure to follow the mandatory delays for sentencing provided in La.Code Crim.
State Of Louisiana v. Porter Major, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Nevertheless, - 34 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Kirby Thomas La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Nevertheless, - 34 ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Trivual A. Charles -Aka- Trivual Batiste -Aka- Trivual Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 6/26/96), this court, recognized the failure to follow the mandatory delays for sentencing provided in La.Code Crim.
State of Louisiana v. Elvin Bryant Jinks, Jr. -Aka- Elvin Jinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Jinks 267 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2 In State v. Augustine , , 1333-34 (La.
State v. Charles 270 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 6/26/96) , , this court, relying on State v. Augustine , recognized the failure to follow the mandatory delays for sentencing provided in La.Code Crim.
State v. Francis 268 So. 3d 289 La. 2019
See State v. Augustine , (La.
State v. McIntosh 275 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Distinguished State v. Harrell 247 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Augustine , (La.
State v. Magee 243 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Nevertheless, , 1333-34 (La.
State v. Van Nortrick 244 So. 3d 810 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
However, in State v. Augustine , (La.
State v. Green 245 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
10/18/17), --- So.3d ----, 2017 WL 4681356 ; State v. Augustine , (La.
State v. Steines 245 So. 3d 224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
The Louisiana Supreme Court stated in State v. Augustine , (La.
State v. White 206 So. 3d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Gardner 204 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Followed State of Louisiana v. Robbie Ray Frith AKA - Robbie Frith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
the Louisiana Supreme Court held: The last issue before us concerns the mandatory delays specified in La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Gibson 192 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
art. 930.8 does not apply to motions ■ to ■ correct illegal sentences under Article 882); (“A sentence illegally imposed, even one not constitutionally excessive, is null ...”).
State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
( and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ).
State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
ng the robbery, to be served consecutively, the fourth circuit discussed whether the sentence was excessive for a first timé offender, and noted: In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of thirty-five to fifty years' have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, ( and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ).
State of Louisiana v. Glyndale Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
statutorily superseded on other grounds, the supreme court held that a forty-year sentence was not excessive for an eighteen- year old first offender convicted of armed robbery.
State v. Arceneaux 164 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
statutorily superseded on other grounds, the supreme court held that a forty-year sentence was not excessive for an eighteen-year old first offender convicted of armed robbery.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by