DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Porter v. Butler, 573 So. 2d 1106.

98 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Tobias Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana v. McKartney Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    which prohibited habitual offender enhancement of more than one conviction obtained on the same date arising out of a single criminal act or episode.
  • State v. Young 271 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    Porter v. Butler , which prohibited habitual offender enhancement of more than one conviction obtained on the same date arising out of a single criminal act or episode.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarlon W. Pierre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Pierre 165 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Augustine 125 So. 3d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    and held that "[tjhere is no statutory bar to applying the habitual offender law in sentencing for more than one conviction obtained on the same date.” Shaw at 1245 .
  • State v. Holloway 120 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Wayne Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Jones 105 So. 3d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Lewis 104 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Brandon Dale Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Porter [v. Butler, ] court, this goal is not served when a defendant commits multiple felonies in a continuous episode of criminal activity but is punished more severely for only one of those felonies.
  • State v. Allen 79 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Porter [v. Butler, ] court, this goal is not served when a defendant commits multiple felonies in a continuous episode of criminal activity but is punished more severely for only one of those felonies.
  • State v. Bobo 77 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Morgan 34 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Cass 17 So. 3d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Delta Wayne White La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Baylor 998 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    ] Porter[ v. Butler, ] court, we find no legislative purpose or policy that is contradicted by failing to read such a prohibition into the statute's language.
  • State v. Robbins 986 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Boyd 978 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Shaw 969 So. 2d 1233 La. 2007
    which prohibited habitual offender enhancement of more than one conviction obtained on the same date arising out of a single criminal act or episode.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tommy Cloud La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Cloud 946 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Morgan 948 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Shaw 939 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    he contends that multiple counts arising out of a single criminal act or episode cannot be enhanced under the statute, La.
  • State v. Robinson 929 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [P]olicy considerations support the continued viability of the rule precluding habitual offender enhancement of more than one conviction obtained the same date arising out of a single criminal act or episode....
  • State v. Galle 904 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    multiple counts arising out of a single criminal act or episode cannot each be enhanced under the multiple offender statute.
  • State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    and State v. McCurtis, 00-3080 (La.
  • State v. Hood 895 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    and State v. McCurtis, 00-3080 (La.11/2/01), .
  • State of Louisiana v. John M. Benedict La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Benedict 887 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Hotard 864 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Page, 02-689 (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 859 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that "[m]ultiple convictions obtained the same day for offenses arising out of one criminal episode should be considered as one conviction for purposes of applying the habitual offender law in sentencing."
  • State v. Hannon 852 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    the supreme court held that a defendant who was convicted on one day for three counts of armed robbery arising out of one criminal episode could not be adjudicated a habitual offender and sentenced as such on all three convictions.
  • State v. Small 850 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Anderson, 36,969 (La.App.2d Cir.4/9/03), .
  • State v. Anderson 842 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Page 837 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Jackson 828 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[mjultiple convictions obtained the same day for offenses arising out of one criminal episode should be considered as one conviction for purposes of applying the habitual offender law in sentencing.” 573 So.2d at 1109 .
  • State v. Porche 819 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    stated that multiple convictions obtained on the same date and arising from the same criminal episode are to be treated as a single conviction for purposes of the habitual offender law in sentencing.
  • State v. Ventress 817 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Payne 814 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Wilson 803 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    multiple counts arising out of a single criminal act or episode cannot each be enhanced under the multiple offender statute.
  • State v. Daniels 800 So. 2d 770 La. 2001
  • State v. McCurtis 800 So. 2d 862 La. 2001
    (“Multiple convictions obtained the same day for offenses arising out of one criminal episode should be considered as one conviction for purposes of applying the habitual offender law in sentencing.”).
  • State v. Tapp 788 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Kennon 781 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    explained the applicability of habitual offender provisions to multiple convictions.
  • State v. Hawthorne 772 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    where the defendant was convicted of three armed robberies arising out of the same criminal episode, the Supreme Court explained that the key issue is not whether the convictions occurred on the same date but whether the convictions arose out of the same criminal episode.
  • State v. Luna 772 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Freeman 770 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Horne 768 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Jackson 767 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Stack, 97-1176 (La.