Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 559 So. 2d 114.
-
State of Louisiana v. Gary D. Howard
226 So. 3d 419
La. 2017
5 circumstantial evidence, could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” (per curiam).
- State of Louisiana v. Russell Lippman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- State v. Lippman 38 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- State of Louisiana v. Warren Fuselier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- State v. Fuselier 885 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- State v. Zachary 829 So. 2d 405 La. 2002
- State v. Martin 769 So. 2d 1168 La. 2000
-
State v. Carlos
738 So. 2d 556
La. 1999
490 (1836)); (per curiam) ("There is a presumption of regularity in judicial proceedings.") [4] In Shelton , we defined a "perfect" transcript as one "which reflects a voluntary, informed, and articulated waiver of the three specific rights mentioned in Boykin .
- State v. Evans 715 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
-
State v. LeBlanc
702 So. 2d 377
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Harris, 93-1098 (La.1/5/96)
- State v. Hawkins 688 So. 2d 473 La. 1997
- State v. Hampton 687 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- State v. Quatrevingt 670 So. 2d 197 La. 1996
- State v. Harris 665 So. 2d 1164 La. 1996
-
State v. Leon
638 So. 2d 220
La. 1994
There is a presumption of regularity in judicial proceedings, (per curiam); La.R.S.
- State v. Davis 562 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990