Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hallal, 557 So. 2d 1388.

80 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. William A. McDonough La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Kayla Jean Giles Coutee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
“’[A] challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.’” -90 (La.1990)(emphasis added)().
State of Louisiana v. Allen Joseph Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
“[A] challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole 7 reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.” –90 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Charles Chandler La. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Barnes Derrick Groves La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Halford La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
App. 1st Cir. 1989), vacated on otherrog unds, ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Cody Nicholas Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
“[A] challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.” -90 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Ladell La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
“[A] challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice, or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.” Turner, supra, (La.
State of Louisiana v. Miles J. Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
To support this claim, in Defendant’s -90 (La.1990), in which the supreme court held that “[a] challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably
State v. Guidry 271 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
To support this claim, in Defendant's brief he cites State v. Hallal , , 1389-90 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Michael Lee Walls La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably [inferred].” See State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), Maxie, 93-2158 at 16-17, 653 So.2d at 535; -1390 (La.1990) (per curiam); -65 (La.1986)
State v. Walls 270 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
929 (La.1985) ; See State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), , 423 ; Maxie , 93-2158 at 16-17, 653 So.2d at 535 ; , 1389-1390 (La.1990) (per curiam); , 264-65 (La.1986) ; , 38 (La.1983).
State of Louisiana v. Prince Record La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Record 266 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Hallal , , 1389-90 (La.
Palmer v. UV Ins. Risk Retention Grp., Inc. 262 So. 3d 1006 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
citing State v. Hallal , , 1390 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Aaron Orlando Richards -Aka- Aaron Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
clares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably [inferred].” See State v. Frost, 97–1771, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), Maxie, 93–2158 at 16–17, 653 So.2d at 535; –1390 (La.1990) (per curiam); –65 (La.1986)
State v. Richards 247 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
12/1/98), , 423 ; Maxie , 93-2158 at 16-17, 653 So.2d at 535 ; , 1389-1390 (La.
State v. Harris 235 So. 3d 1354 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
190 , 142 L.Ed.2d 155 (1998), (-90 (La.
State of Louisiana v. George D. Lowdins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Lowdins 229 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Earnest G. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
a challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror 21 declares his ability to remain impartial when the juror’s response as a whole reveals facts from which biased, prejudice, or inability to render judgment according
State v. Hamilton 216 So. 3d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
a challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror | ¡adeclares his ability to remain impartial when the juror’s response as a whole reveals facts from which biased, prejudice, or inability to render judgment according to the law may be reasonably implied.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Mickelson 210 So. 3d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Robert Glen Coleman 188 So. 3d 174 La. 2016
“[A] challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.” -90 (La.
Distinguished State of Louisiana v. Calvin Louis Noel, III AKA - Calvin Noel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Finally, a case where the supreme court reversed a conviction based on a prospective juror’s acquaintance with five police officers the state intended to call as witnesses at trial.
Distinguished State v. Noel 181 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Finally, a case where the supreme court reversed a conviction based on a prospective juror’s acquaintance with five police officers the state intended to caE as witnesses at trial.
State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker 181 So. 3d 590 La. 2015
“[A] challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror‟s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.” -90 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jerry Vaughn Clifton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Kang, 02-2812 at 5, 859 So.2d at 653; -90 (La.1990).
State v. Clifton 165 So. 3d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Kang , 02-2812 at 5, 859 So.2d at 653 ; -90 (La.1990).
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 1989), rev’d on other grounds, a prospective juror stated that she knew the victim as well as his family, and that relationship would make it difficult to serve on the jury.
State v. Hamilton 127 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
App. 3 Cir.1989), rev’d on other grounds, a prospective juror stated that she knew the victim as well as his family, and that relationship would make it difficult to serve on the jury.
State v. Munson 115 So. 3d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
190 , 142 L.Ed.2d 155 (1998), (-90 (La.1990)).
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
Juniors , 03-2425 at 9, 915 So.2d at 305 ; -90 (La.1990).
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably [inferred].” See State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), ; Maxie , 93-2158 at 16-17, 653 So.2d at 535 ; -1390 (La.1990) (per curiam); -65 (La.1986)
State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
Kang , 02-2812 at 5, 859 So.2d at 653 ; -90 (La.1990).
State of Louisiana v. David G. Sarpy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Sarpy 52 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Anderson 28 So. 3d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“[A] challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.” Id., -90 (La.1990).
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
Wyatt v. Hendrix 998 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
1281 , -90 (La.1990) (other internal citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the venire member who was not excused for cause was the wife of a fifteen-year veteran of the Vernon Parish Sheriff’s Office and knew five of the police officer witnesses.
State v. Lindsey 948 So. 2d 105 La. 2007
Kang , 02-2812, at p. 5, 859 So.2d at 653 ; -90 (La.1990).
State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the venire member who was not excused for cause was the wife of a fifteen-year veteran of the Vernon Parish Sheriff's Office and knew five of the police officer witnesses.
State of Louisiana v. Lisa Landry Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Johnson 941 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
this Court noted that while the trial judge is accorded broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause, "[a] challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror's responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or