DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Simms, 571 So. 2d 145.

52 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Carlshane Dennis La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
    The determination of probable cause depends on whether the evidence supports the reasonable belief that a person has committed a crime, but does not require “the fine resolution of conflicting evidence that a reasonable doubt or even a preponderance standard demands, and credibility determinations are seldom crucial.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua X. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    Similarly, which the State also cited, the supreme court found probable cause when the defendant, on appeal, likewise challenged the denial of his motion to suppress: The totality of the information known to the police at the time of the arrest in this case was sufficient to justify a man of
  • State v. Griffin 217 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    Similarly, which the State also cited, the supreme court found probable cause when the defendant, on appeal, likewise challenged the denial of his motion to suppress: The totality of the information known to the police at the time of the arrest in this case was sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in b
  • State of Louisiana v. Ricky J. Charpentier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Charpentier 86 So. 3d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Harveston 71 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Williams 53 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. George Earl White, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    4 the court explained, in pertinent part: The determination of probable cause, although requiring something more than bare suspicion, does not require evidence sufficient to support a conviction.
  • State v. Kelley 8 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Sam 988 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Woods 982 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Kang 866 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Bradley 867 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Green 831 So. 2d 962 La. 2002
  • State v. Singleton 828 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Jones 822 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    -149 (La.1990), the Louisiana Supreme Court made a full and comprehensive statement of the elements and qualities of probable cause, as follows: Probable cause to arrest exists when the facts and circumstances within the officer’s knowledge are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the
  • State v. Graham 820 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Fleming 820 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Butler 812 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Diaz 800 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    App. 4 Cir. 2/16/00), , (La.
  • State v. Washington 778 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    -149 (La.1990), the court made a full and comprehensive statement of the elements and qualities of probable cause, as follows: Probable cause to arrest exists when the facts and circumstances within the officer’s knowledge are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the person to be arres
  • State v. Broussard 769 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    nt to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than the precise timing of an officer’s statements: ‘You are under arrest,’ that are determinative of when an arrest is actually made.” (); [sic]
  • Gibson v. State 758 So. 2d 782 La. 2000
    854 , 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975)
  • Rodriguez v. Deen 759 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Franks, 31,641 (La.App.2d Cir.2/24/99), , (La.
  • State v. Smith 761 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    t to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than the precise timing' of an officer’s statements: ‘You are under arrest,’ that are determinative of when an arrest is actually made.” (); [sic]
  • State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. James 755 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    -149 (La.1990), the court made a full and comprehensive statement of the elements and qualities of probable cause, as follows: Probable cause to arrest exists when the facts and circumstances within the officer's knowledge are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the person to be arres
  • State v. Green 750 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    noted the following: Probable cause to arrest exists when the facts and circumstances within the officer's knowledge are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the person to be arrested has committed a crime.
  • State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Jones 733 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Smiley 729 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Franks 730 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • Harrison v. State 721 So. 2d 458 La. 1998
    223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964)
  • State v. Fisher 720 So. 2d 1179 La. 1998
  • State v. Amos 714 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    ntent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty- of the accused, rather than the precise timing of an officer’s statements: “You are under arrest,’ that are determinative of when an arrest is actually made.” (); see also
  • State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    the Louisiana Supreme Court clarified the issue of when an arrest occurs: An arrest occurs when the circumstances indicate an intent by the police to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than at the precise time the officer tells the accused he is under arrest.
  • State v. Fisher 692 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. McCartney 684 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    noted the following: Probable cause to arrest exists when the facts and circumstances within the officer's knowledge are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the person to be arrested has committed a crime.
  • State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
  • State v. Mitchell 679 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Wimberly 678 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Hebert 676 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Davis 666 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Bruser 661 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Freeman 653 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Young 642 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Solomon 634 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    State v. Bourgeois, supra.