Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roberts v. Benoit, 605 So. 2d 1032.

308 citing documents.

Osazuwa Awanbor v. Delores L. Williams, GEICO Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
3d 238, 243- 247 ( ( La.
William Campbell v. Orient-Express Hotels Louisiana, Inc., Windsor Court Hotel Inc. of Delaware, Windsor Court Hotel, L.L.C., Windsor … La. 2025
Thomas Allen and Elva Allen v. State of Louisiana, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries and Devin Bryant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Maria Mickens Green, Individually and as the Natural Tutrix of the Minors, Joshua Evans, Makiya Mickens, Vernon Evans, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
The Louisiana Supreme Court, (La.
Gabriel Lagrange v. Harley Boone La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Dustin Brown Versus Rlc Trucking LLC, Guideone Mutual Insurance Company, and Charles Johnson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Catherine Williams, Indv. and Ronnie Williams, Indv. v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Ct La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Toyonicka Cormier v. Boys Town Louisiana, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Jena Rougeau v. Hospital Service District 2 of Beauregard Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/22/09), explained: “Regardless if stated in terms of proximate cause, legal cause, or duty, the scope of the duty inquiry is ultimately a question of policy as to whether the particular risk falls within the scope of the duty.”
Jose Hernandez-Reyes Versus All-Pro Roofers, Inc., Marcelino Canales, & Kenneth Westcott La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 5 Cir. 6/29/17), (La.
Stella Maris Condominium Association, Inc. v. David Trautenberg La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Finally, while the Association’s construction of the awning without a permit is questionable, this Court finds that such an omission was not within the scope of the duty owed by the 16 Association to Trautenberg, as the permit requirement was not “intended to protect this plaintiff from this type of harm arising in this manner.” -45 (La.
Maria Mickens Green, Individually and as the Natural Tutrix of the Minors, Joshua Evans, Makiya Mickens, Vernon Evans, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Fred Jones v. Judy S. Boudreaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
(on reh’g) (May 28, 1992), () (emphasis added).
Anthony Cemo Versus State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and John Doe La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 5 Cir. 6/29/17), (La.
c/w 2022-cc-00539 c/w 2022-cc-00730 La. 2023
60, 73 (1956)); Hill v. Lundin & Assocs., Inc.
Reginald Martin v. Rodney Thomas, Greer Logging, Llc and National Liability And Fire Insurance Company La. 2022
Patricia Desselle Versus State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and David Siles La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Officer John Doe, Police Officer v. Deray Mckesson; Black Lives Matter; Black Lives Matter Network, Incorporated La. 2022
Luigi Malta, Individually And On Behalf Of His Minor Child, Giovanni Malta v. Herbert S. Hiller Corporation, Hiller … La. 2021
Gwendolyn Tammy Hemphill, individually, and as the natural mother of Noah Hemphill, and Patricia Hemphill, wife of/and Michael … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
3d , 2021 WL 1609247, * 3 ( ( La.
Julio Laboriel-Pitio and Franklin Gustavo Arriola v. Latoya Latiker, Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 12/27/17), ( (La.
Explained Angelia M. Landers and Cabba's Grill, LLC v. USIC Locating Services, Inc. and Spinks Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Charles R. Steib v. Lamorak Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
In determining causation, it is irrelevant whether the defendant's actions were “‘lawful, unlawful, intentional, unintentional, negligent or non-negligent.’” (La.
Joey M. Gray and Carolyn Gray v. State Farm Insurance Company, Patrick W. Johnson, Murray R. Harper, and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Daniel Harris v. Boh Bros. Construction Co., LLC and Abc Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
George Morgan v. Louisiana State Trooper Chad Richard 2564 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
De Rome A. Seals v. Franklin Avenue Baptist Church of New Orleans, La La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
7/02/03), ( on reh’g, ).
Pelitire v. Rinker 270 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
See Roberts v. Benoit , , 1037 (La.
Chreene v. Howard C. Prince, Jr. & Rowdy Adventures, L. L.C. 256 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Roberts v. Benoit , ; Richardson v. Lloyds , 48,715 (La.
Shephard v. AIX Energy, Inc. 249 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
AIX cites the "scope of protection" concept, Robert v. Benoit , (La.
Lahare v. Valentine Mechanical Services, LLC 223 So. 3d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Reider v. Christus Health Southwestern Louisiana 215 So. 3d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5 Thus, (on rehearing), the plaintiff suggests that hex-ultimate burden of proof would have required her to demonsti-ate that: 1) the defendant had a duty to conduct itself to a specific standard; 2) the defendant failed to do so and, therefore, breached its duty; 3) the substandard conduct was a cause-in-fact of th
Vince v. Koontz 213 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
See Rando, supra at 1088 ; -46 (La.
Jones v. Stewart 203 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
7/02/03), ( on reh’g, ).
Richardson v. ASI Lloyd's 206 So. 3d 349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Chatman v. Southern University at New Orleans 197 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Ron Warren, Ind. & O/B/O Estate of Derek Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
“The critical test in Louisiana, however, is phrased in terms of ‘the ease of association’ which melds policy and foreseeability into one inquiry: Is the harm which befell the plaintiff easily associated with the type of conduct engaged in by the defendant?” (citing Timothy J. McNamara, The Duties and Risks of the Duty–Risk Analysis, 44 La.L.Rev.
Warren v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 196 So. 3d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“The critical test in Louisiana, however, is phrased in terms of ‘the ease of association’ which melds policy and foreseeability into one inquiry: Is the harm which befell the plaintiff easily associated with the type of conduct engaged in by the defendant?” (citing Timothy J. McNamara, The Duties and Risks of the Duty-Risk Analysis, 44 La.L.Rev.
American Rebel Arms, LLC v. New Orleans Hamburger & Seafood Co. 186 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
England v. Fifth Louisiana Levee District 167 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Skillman v. Riverside Baptist Church of Jefferson Parish 171 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc., 08-1163 (La.5/22/09)
Patricia Parker v. Town of Woodworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93–2661 (La.7/5/94)
Parker v. Town of Woodworth 160 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94)
Cook v. Depingre 161 So. 3d 914 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Blake v. City of Port Allen 167 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Richardson v. Lloyds 136 So. 3d 953 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Rodriguez v. Walters 136 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 12/20/06), , as follows: The legal causation or scope of duty inquiry “assumes a duty exists and questions whether the injury the plaintiff suffered is one of the risks encompassed by the rule of law that imposed the duty.”
Carney v. Eldorado Resort Casino Shreveport 132 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Bennett Motor Express, L.L.C. 131 So. 3d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Though the court in Eustis considered a statutory violation, similar to the issue before us in the instant case, it nevertheless conducted a duty— risk analysis utilizing the same duty — risk analysis employed in negligence cases: the Louisiana Supreme Court held that in order to prevail on a negligence claim under La.
Melissa Broussard v. Retail Investors of Texas, Ltd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4/25/01), ( (on rehearing)).