Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc., 593 So. 2d 357.
-
Magee v. Abek, Inc.
934 So. 2d 800
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc., (La.
-
James R. Duplechain v. Bell Office Supply
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
-
Duplechain v. Bell Office Supply
926 So. 2d 149
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
-
Seidl v. Zatarain's, Inc.
927 So. 2d 557
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
NOTES [1] Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc.
-
Roberts v. Thibodaux Healthcare Center
934 So. 2d 84
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Burns v. Guarantee Service Team of Professionals
934 So. 2d 733
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Shelby Smith v. Morris & Dickson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
th provisions setting forth which injuries are compensable under the workers’ compensation scheme or what constitutes an “accident” under the workers’ compensation scheme, the general rule that the governing law in a compensation action is that which was in effect at the time of the alleged injury, enunciated in such cases as Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc., Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., and Smith v. Exxon Chem.
-
Smith v. Morris & Dickson
924 So. 2d 1217
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Because we are not dealing with provisions setting forth which injuries are compensable under the workers' compensation scheme or what constitutes an "accident" under the workers' compensation scheme, the general rule that the governing law in a compensation action is that which was in effect at the time of the alleged injury, enunciated in such cases as Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc., Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., and Smith v. Exxon Chem.
-
Clement v. Blanchard
924 So. 2d 295
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
NOTES [1] Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc.
-
Yuronda Jackson v. St. Francis Cabrini Hospital
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc.
-
Joseph P. Roy v. Hub City Paving Contractors
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits
-
Roy v. Hub City Paving Contractors
921 So. 2d 1215
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this' burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s version of the inci
- Jackson v. CHRISTUS HEALTH CENTRAL LOUIS. 922 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
Nathan Wright v. Cypress General Contractors
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc.
-
Emmitt Anthony v. Southern Chevrolet Cadillac
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence 5 discr
-
Donovan Monceaux v. R & R Construction, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious d
-
Anthony v. Southern Chevrolet Cadillac, Inc.
918 So. 2d 1070
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence | ^discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s version of the in
-
Monceaux v. R & R CONST., INC.
919 So. 2d 795
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee's burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker's testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker's version of the incid
- Wright v. CYPRESS GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. 918 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Dick v. B & B CUT STONE CO., LLC
917 So. 2d 1191
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., (citations omitted).
-
Hammock v. Weyerhaeuser
917 So. 2d 733
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., Kidd v. Brown Radiator & Frame, 38,729 (La.App.2d Cir.12/22/04), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/24/05), .
-
Chaisson v. Philip Services Corp.
917 So. 2d 514
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Michael Chaisson v. Philip Services Corporation
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Veal v. AMERICAN MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
923 So. 2d 668
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530 (La.1/14/94), ; Bruno v. Harbert Intern., Inc.
-
Meneses v. IFCO Systems, Inc.
923 So. 2d 111
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Sheppard v. Isle of Capri
909 So. 2d 699
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Action of the WCJ The WCJ cited the law governing the plaintiff's burden of proving an unwitnessed accident, Bruno v. Harbert Int'l Inc., 91-1444 (La.1/17/92)
- Fredericks v. Beverly Industries, Inc. 910 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
-
Molinere v. Vinson Guard Service, Inc.
914 So. 2d 566
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Byrd v. Caddo Parish School Bd.
907 So. 2d 849
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Booker v. International Rivercenter
905 So. 2d 498
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
See Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Hays v. Western Refractory Construction, Inc.
903 So. 2d 666
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., Kidd v. Brown Radiator & Frame, 38,729 (La.App.
-
Paul B. Zachary v. Wal-Mart Distribution Center
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
-
Zachary v. Wal-Mart Distribution Center
902 So. 2d 1140
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
-
McGuyer v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NY
895 So. 2d 701
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Gay v. Georgia Pacific Corporation, 32,653 (La.App.2d Cir.12/22/99), .
-
Kim Bigge v. the Lemoine Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s
-
Young v. Physicians & Surgeons Hosp.
895 So. 2d 723
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Johnson v. Johnson Controls Inc., supra .
-
Bigge v. the Lemoine Co.
896 So. 2d 269
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee's burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker's testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker's version of the incid
-
Linda Faye Whaley v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Douglas v. Grey Wolf 3 Drilling Co., 03-515 (La.App.
-
Michael Tauzin v. Louisiana Pigment Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
-
Tauzin v. Louisiana Pigment Co.
894 So. 2d 560
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
-
Whaley v. Christus St. Patrick Hosp.
893 So. 2d 915
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Douglas v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co. , 03-515 (La.App.
-
Player v. International Paper Co.
892 So. 2d 781
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Albert v. Trans Met, Inc., 38,261 (La.App.2d Cir.6/23/04), ; Qualls v. Stone Container Corporation, 29,794 (La.App.2d Cir.9/24/97), , writ denied, 1997-2929 (La.2/6/98), ; Bruno v. Harbert *786 International Inc.
-
Easly v. D & O Contractors, Inc.
895 So. 2d 23
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/24/04), , citing Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
-
Hallaron v. Jacob's Engineering Group, Inc.
893 So. 2d 127
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/24/04), , citing Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc.
- Frith v. Riverwood, Inc. 892 So. 2d 7 La. 2005
-
Kidd v. Brown Radiator & Frame
890 So. 2d 796
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Wilkes v. Ivan Smith Furniture Co.
890 So. 2d 780
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Russell J. Guidry v. International Maintenance Co., LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
-
Guidry v. International Maintenance Co., LLC
888 So. 2d 1137
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
-
Harrison v. Baldwin Motors
889 So. 2d 313
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.