DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc., 593 So. 2d 357.

834 citing documents.

  • Russell v. House of Raeford Farms 968 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Bruno v. Harbert Intern., Inc., Hunt Plywood, Inc., supra .
  • Gilliland v. City of Monroe 968 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Plastics, Inc., 99-2676 (La.6/30/00), , citing Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc., Peters v. General Motors Corp., 39,279 (La.App.
  • Smith v. Town of Olla 966 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc.
  • Jack v. Prairie Cajun Seafood Wholesale 967 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Goldie M. Jack v. Prairie Cajun Seafood Wholesale La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc.
  • Willie L. Lollis, Jr. v. Shaw Global Energy Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    : A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s version of the incident; and (2) the worker’s testimony is corroborated by the c
  • Elaine Smith v. Town of Olla La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
  • Lollis v. SHAW GLOBAL ENERGY SERVICES 966 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. White 970 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Hayes v. Louisiana State Penitentiary 970 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Kenneth D. Lopez v. Town of Zwolle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    29 30 The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Bruno v. Harbert International 31 Inc., expounded on what proof will 32 satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: 33 34 A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge 35 this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: 36 (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious dou
  • Lopez v. Town of Zwolle 963 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s version of the incid
  • Juanita G. Guilbeaux v. Office of the District Attorney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
  • Larry Ray Vidrine v. La-Tex Rubber & Specialties, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc., (citations omitted), expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doub
  • Guilbeaux v. Office of Dist. Attorney 957 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc.
  • Vidrine v. LA-TEX RUBBER & SPECIALTIES 958 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc., (citations omitted), expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee's burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker's testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker's
  • Shelvin v. INTRALOX, LLC 957 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Id., quoting Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc.
  • Weekly v. LWCC 960 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Authement , 2002-2434 at p. 7, 857 So.2d at 571 (citing Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., ).
  • James B. Doyle, Jr. v. Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of 4 proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s version of the incident; and (2) the worker’s testimony is corroborated by the circumstances following the alleged incident.” Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc., (La.
  • Marcia Wyble v. Acadiana Preparatory School La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc.
  • Doyle v. Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. 956 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    “A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of | sproof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s version of the incident; and (2) the worker’s testimony is corroborated by the circumstances following the alleged incident.” Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
  • Wyble v. Acadiana Preparatory School 956 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Hosli v. Rent-A-Center, Inc. 957 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc.
  • Ella Mae Smith v. Kinder Retirement and Rehabilitation Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    4/19/96), (quoting Bruno v. Harbert Intern., Inc., ) (quoting, -45 (La.1989)).
  • Littleton v. Richardson Medical Center 954 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., Kidd v. Brown Radiator & Frame, 38,729 (La.App.
  • Smith v. KINDER RETIREMENT AND REH. CENTER 954 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    App. 3 Cir. 1/31/96), , writ denied, 96-0553 (La.4/19/96), (quoting Bruno v. Harbert Intern., Inc., ) (quoting, -45 (La.1989)).
  • Crawford v. PONTCHARTRAIN MATERIALS 960 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Hooper v. LA. DEPT. OF AGR. AND FORESTRY 960 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Crickett Miller v. Blacktype Farms La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Bruno 8 v. Harbert International, Inc.
  • Miller v. Blacktype Farms 952 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
  • Baca v. Natchitoches Parish Hosp. 948 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    at 377 () (citations omitted).
  • Timothy Butterfield v. Turner Industries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    5/5/06), noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts seriou
  • Brian Baca v. Natchitoches Parish Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    at 377 (quoting Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc., (La.
  • Butterfield v. Turner Industries 951 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800 , writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee's burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker's testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker's version of the incid
  • Williams v. Exide Technologies 948 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • Bertrand v. Dow Chemical Co. 951 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • Guillory v. Bofinger's Tree Service 950 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Thomas v. Wal-Mart, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.App.
  • Hebert v. CG LOGAN CONST., INC. 942 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc.
  • Virgil Hebert v. C.G. Logan Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
  • Hubbard v. Allied Building Stores, Inc. 942 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
  • Brock v. Frymasters 942 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    The transcript clearly shows, however, that the WCJ stated the correct legal standard as enunciated in Bruno v. Harbert Int'l Inc., 91-1444 (La.1/17/92), , 361: "A worker's testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker's version of the incident; and (2) the worker's testimony is corroborated by the circumstances following the alleged incid
  • Phillips v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United 939 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee's burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker's testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker's version of the incid
  • Justin Phillips v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., United Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee's burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the work
  • Newsome v. Atmos Energy 938 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    As the court explained in Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., (La.
  • Taylor v. Hollywood Casino 935 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
  • Janice Fluitt v. Christus St. Frances Cabrini Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Fluitt’s] version of the incident.” In considering these assignments of error, we first note that “[t]he trial court’s determinations as to whether the worker’s testimony is credible and whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof are factual determinations not to be disturbed on review unless clearly wrong or absent a showing of manifest error.” Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc.
  • Fluitt v. Christus Health Cent. Louisiana 935 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Russell v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 933 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • Foley v. Sportran, City of Shreveport 930 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    4th Cir.10/30/02), ; Qualls v. Stone Container Corporation, 29,794 (La.App.2d Cir.9/24/97), ; Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc.
  • Authement v. Consolidated Water Works District 1 935 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006