Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lima v. Schmidt, 595 So. 2d 624.

269 citing documents.

Fountain v. LaVigne 980 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Co. v. Eckert, 95-156 (La.App.
Sandy v. EAST BATON ROUGE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 977 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Neikirk v. Resource Management, Inc. 983 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Riehm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 977 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
MacK v. BATON ROUGE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER 966 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Wells v. City of Hammond 966 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
OIL INS. LTD. v. Dow Chemical Co. 977 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
See Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), ; -29 (La.1992), and compare Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707 pp. 6-9 (La.6/21/02), -09 (burden remains on exceptor if contra non valentem principle codified into the applicable prescriptive codal article or statute).
Scallan v. Brees 962 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Bracken v. Payne and Keller Company, Inc. 970 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Huth v. Pickering 966 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Edwards v. Alexander 960 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Roger E. Piper v. Shetler Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Sinegal v. Kennedy, 04-299 (La.App.
Piper v. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co. 958 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Sinegal v. Kennedy, 04-299 (La.App.
In Re Noe 958 So. 2d 617 La. 2007
at 16, 892 So.2d at 1271
Louisiana Ag Credit v. Livestock Producers 954 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Bernard Parish, XXXX-XXXX (La.9/5/01), ; Fuller, supra .
Austin v. State Farm Ins. Co. 956 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Thibaut Oil Co. v. Holly 961 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
at pp. 12-13, 19-20, 785 So.2d at 788 , 791-92 ().
Hampton v. Audubon Insurance Co. 948 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Lima v. *334 Schmidt, Bank of Jena v. Robbie’s Auto Body, Inc., (La.App.
Brenda Frank v. Piggly Wiggly Company Stores La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Mallett v. McNeal 939 So. 2d 1254 La. 2006
Thereafter, -34 (La.1992), this court cited the commentary of Baudry-Lacantinerie and Tissier: Acknowledgment is a simple admission.
ESTATE OF DEGRAAUW v. Travelers Ins. Co. 940 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Estate of Frank Degraauw v. Travelers Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Acorn Community Land Ass'n of Louisiana v. Zeno 936 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 8/28/02), , writ denied, 02-2456 (La.11/22/02)
ACORN COMMUNITY LAND ASS'N OF LA. v. Zeno 936 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 8/28/02), , writ denied, 02-2456 (La.11/22/02)
Slaughter v. ARCO Chemical Company 931 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
-632 (La.1992), that once prescription has run acknowledgment is no longer applicable; the applicable doctrine is then "renunciation": Acknowledgment and renunciation differ in both substance and legal effect.
Young v. Gremillion 924 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Sours v. Kneipp 923 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
In support of this-argument, which held in part that when an attorney expressly warrants a specific result and fails to obtain it, the action for legal malpractice is in contract and is subject to a ten-year prescriptive period.
Metro Electric & Maintenance, Inc. v. Bank One Corporation and Janece Riser La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
METRO ELEC. & MAINTENANCE v. Bank One Corp. 924 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Schilling v. Cooper 928 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Civ.Code art. 3520), 2 “[pjrescription is interrupted when one acknowledges the right of the person against whom he had commenced to prescribe.” An acknowledgment is-“the recognition of the creditor’s right or obligation that halts the progress of prescription before it has run its course.”
Hodges v. Republic Western Ins. Co. 921 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Risin v. D.N.C. Investments, L.L.C. 921 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Lima v. *136 Schmidt, Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries, 04-0131 (La.App.
Risin v. DNC INVESTMENTS, LLC 921 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Lima v. *136 Schmidt, Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries, 04-0131 (La.App.
Bealer v. Vancourt 917 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Stewart Head, Et Ux. v. Shetler Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Rogers Brown v. Michael J. Neustrom, Lafayette Parish Sheriff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Head v. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co. 916 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Brown v. Neustrom 916 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Grefer v. Alpha Technical 901 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Perez v. Finn 899 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Alexander v. Fulco 895 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Explained Carter v. Haygood 892 So. 2d 1261 La. 2005
[8] we explained: *1271 More recently, we recognized that prescription will be suspended "during the attorney's continuous representation of the client regarding the specific subject matter in which the alleged wrongful act or omission occ
Certified Capital Corp. v. Reis 897 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries 888 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Jamie Hebert v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Hebert v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 884 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Sinegal v. Kennedy 883 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Michael Sinegal v. Richard R. Kennedy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Jones v. State 891 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
White v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 878 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004