Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lima v. Schmidt, 595 So. 2d 624.
-
Jumonville v. King
870 So. 2d 462
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
*466 the plaintiff argues that because there was an ongoing and continuous attorney-client relationship between her and defendant, the three-year peremptive period of LSA-R.S.
- John T. Bennett v. State Farm Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Bennett v. State Farm Ins. Co. 869 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Rosen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 870 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
- Eastin v. Entergy Corp. 865 So. 2d 49 La. 2004
- Eiswirth v. Anthony L. Golemi, Contractor, Inc. 864 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Bridges v. X Communications, Inc. 861 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- Smith v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CAS. 868 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Diana Weeks v. Louisiana Patients Compensation Fund La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Weeks v. Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund 858 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- Gallina v. Hero Lands Co. 859 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- Hughes v. Olin Corp. 856 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- Greer v. Johnson 855 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- Grant v. Tulane University 853 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- David v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc. 849 So. 2d 38 La. 2003
- State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. MLT CON. 849 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
-
Crochet v. Charles Holston, Inc.
847 So. 2d 775
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
as support for their argument that after three years of non-payment the prescriptive period of 1209(C) has accrued and it may not be interrupted.
-
Fuller v. Baggette
847 So. 2d 26
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Bernard Parish, 00-3518 (La.9/5/01)
- Morris v. Westside Transit Line 841 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- Ss v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Social Servic. 831 So. 2d 926 La. 2002
-
Fontenot v. Duplechain
827 So. 2d 563
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
art. 3449; Lima v. Schmidt, [ ].
- Plaquemines Parish v. RIVER/ROAD CONST. 828 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- Muhammad v. New Orleans Police Department 822 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Welch v. Weingarten Realty Investors Co. 824 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Williams v. Holiday Inn Worldwide 816 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- Geiger v. State Ex Rel Dept. of Health 815 So. 2d 80 La. 2002
- Dauterive Contractors, Inc. v. Landry and Watkins 811 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
- Stett v. Greve 810 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
-
Scales v. Rapides Regional Medical Center
815 So. 2d 925
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
See also Anderson v. Beauregard Mem’l Hosp., 97-1222 (La.App.
- Crain v. Pletka 806 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- Smith v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL AND TREATMENT COUNCIL, INC. 806 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
- Kennedy v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 803 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- Barbarin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 804 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
- Compton v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 796 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
- Elevating Boats, Inc. v. St. Bernard Parish 795 So. 2d 1153 La. 2001
- In Re Medical Review Panel, Claim of Moses 788 So. 2d 1173 La. 2001
- Hendrick v. ABC Ins. Co. 787 So. 2d 283 La. 2001
- Clark v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 785 So. 2d 779 La. 2001
- Buck v. Vermilion Parish School Board 783 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
-
Darby v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
775 So. 2d 592
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Jeter, supra; Bishop, supra.
- Smith v. Frey 772 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-
Gettys v. Sessions and Fishman, LLP
772 So. 2d 874
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Civ.Code art. 3461; Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ; Latter v. ABC Ins., Co., 97-1968 (La.App.
-
James v. Clark
767 So. 2d 962
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
[5] (mere recognition of a disputed claim does not constitute an acknowledgment).
-
Hendrick v. ABC Ins. Co.
760 So. 2d 650
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
The court of appeal, in Reeder , Reeder's claim against North was suspended during the period in which North continued to represent Reeder in the state court action.
- Turnbull v. Thensted 757 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- Jeter v. Shamblin 750 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
Coleman v. Acromed Corp.
764 So. 2d 81
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Wilkes, supra ; Bishop, supra .
- General Financial Services, Inc. v. Dean 761 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
-
In Re Letellier
742 So. 2d 544
La. 1999
[9] Lima v. *548 Schmidt, Perez v. Shook, 97-0420 (La.App.
- Greeson v. Acceptance Insurance Co. 738 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999