Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., 616 So. 2d 1234.

559 citing documents.

  • Savoie v. Calcasieu Parish Sheriff's Office 124 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Cupit v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Board of Zoning Adjustments 120 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • St. Landry Homestead Federal Savings Bank v. Hubert Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • St. Landry Homestead Federal Savings Bank v. Vidrine 118 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Hardy v. Easterling 113 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Everything on Wheels Subaru v. Subaru South, Inc., Bogues v. Louisiana Energy Consultants, LLC, 46,434 (La.App.2d Cir.08/10/11), .
  • Gaudet v. Jefferson Parish 116 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Erin L. Richard v. Apache Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    7/7/99), (motion for summary judgment); and Everything on Wheels, Subaru Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc., (exception of no cause of action/no right of action).
  • Richard v. Apache Corp. 111 So. 3d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See Magnon v. Collins, 98-2822 (La.7/7/99), , (motion for summary judgment); and Everything on Wheels, Subaru Inc. v. Suban S., Inc., (exception of no cause of action/no right of action).
  • Kirksey v. New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Foundation, Inc. 116 So. 3d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 6/27/07), , citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., -36 (La.1993).
  • Koch v. Covenant House New Orleans 109 So. 3d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “The court reviews the petition and accepts all well pleaded allegations of fact as true, and the issue at the trial of the exception is whether, on the face of the petition, the plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought.” Meckstroth, supra, *973 p. 2 , 962 So.2d at 492 (citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., -86 (La.1993) (citation omitted)).
  • Blanchard v. Blanchard 112 So. 3d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South., Inc.
  • 2400 Canal, LLC v. Board of Supervisors 105 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    An exception of no cause of action thus tests “the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.” Moreno v. Entergy Corp., 10-2281, p. 8 (La.2/18/11), ; see also Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., La.
  • Udomeh v. Joseph 103 So. 3d 343 La. 2012
    Co., see Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., ("cause of action, as used in the context of the peremptory exception, means the operative facts which give rise to the plaintiff's right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.”).
  • McKamey v. New Orleans Public Facility Management, Inc. 102 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 6/27/07), , citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., -36 (La.1993).
  • M. Tahir Qayyum, M.D. v. Morehouse Parish Hospital Service District 104 So. 3d 505 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Pelican Educational Foundation, Inc. v. Louisiana State Board of Elementary & Secondary Education 97 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., 1
  • Mary Yvette Lejeune v. Paramount Nissan, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
  • LeJeune v. Paramount Nissan, LLC 102 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
  • Milburn v. Emanuele 96 So. 3d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 9/26/07) , , citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., La.
  • Vincent v. Vincent 95 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    (citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Succession of Russo 96 So. 3d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Scranton v. Ashley Ann Energy, L.L.C. 91 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.03/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Raspanti v. Litchfield 89 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Poullard v. St. Amant 89 So. 3d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Coard 88 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Based thereon, our job is to determine “whether, on the face of the petition, the plaintiff is legally entitled to the relief sought.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Credit v. Richland Parish School Board 85 So. 3d 669 La. 2012
    Dept. of Corrections, 00-2882, p. 3 (La.5/15/01), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., ).
  • Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University & Agricultural & Mechanical College v. 2330 Palmyra Street, L.L.C. 80 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that there had been uncertainty in the area of partial judgments on exceptions of no cause of action, stating that it was taking the “opportunity to discuss partial judgments and to distinguish those cases involving separate and distinct causes of action properly cumul
  • Fanto v. Dantro 79 So. 3d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 6/27/07), , citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., -36 (La.1993); (citation omitted).
  • William H. Nungesser v. Michael B. Moreno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Arc Industries, L.L.C. v. Nungesser 74 So. 3d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Suban South, Inc.
  • Jenkins v. Gray Insurance Co. 67 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Timothy Hugh Queen v. H. Gregory Tete, Senior Warden La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Tiffany Chaisson v. Trans Teche, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Moreno v. Entergy Corp. 64 So. 3d 761 La. 2011
    An exception of no cause of action tests “the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Moreno v. Entergy Corp. 62 So. 3d 704 La. 2011
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
  • Favrot v. Favrot 68 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Subaru South, Inc., ("Any party may apply for supervisory writs by showing that an immediate review may materially advance the termination of the litigation.”).
  • James Ronald Savoie v. Romel Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Savoie v. Charles 55 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Mentz Construction Services, Inc. v. Poche 54 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    When used in the context of the peremptory exception, a cause of action “is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • John Taylor, Et Ux. v. Leger Construction, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3/19/04), Article 2315(A) provides that “[e]very act whatever of man that causes damage to another obliges him by whose fault it happened to repair it.” 2 114, 118 (citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., ).
  • Taylor v. Leger Construction, LLC 52 So. 3d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    When used in this context, a cause of action “is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.” Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), (citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., ).
  • Torbert Land Co., L.L.C. v. Montgomery 42 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., see LSA-C.C.P.
  • Side by Side Redevelopment, Inc. v. Sixth District Assessor Marshall 43 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    See Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Young v. Branch 40 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Everything on Wheels Subaru
  • Bianchini v. Muggivan 40 So. 3d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See generally, Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South Inc.
  • Iles v. Ogden 37 So. 3d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In discussing the concept of "cause of action,” we are aware of the extensive and learned discussion of our colleagues on the Louisiana Supreme Court in Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • John Taylor, Et Ux. v. Leger Construction La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Taylor v. Leger Construction, LLC 33 So. 3d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • McGregor v. HOSPICE CARE IN BATON ROUGE 36 So. 3d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • BARKLEY ESTATE COMMUNITY ASS'N v. Huskey 30 So. 3d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., questioned on other grounds as stated in In re Succession of Grimmett, *996 31,975 (La.App.