Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Landry, 588 So. 2d 345.
- State of Louisiana Versus Jeremy Simmons La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
-
State v. Robinson
260 So. 3d 717
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
1978), overruled on other grounds , State v. Landry , (La.
-
State v. Castor
194 So. 3d 668
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
overruled on other grounds
-
State v. Lewis
187 So. 3d 24
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
882 , 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); State v. Cure, 11-2238 (La.7/2/12), ; State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09)
-
Dominique Floyd v. City of Carenco
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
I can’t see all their hands, and it’s just not safe for me. I’d much prefer having the subject standing outside the vehicle to where I can speak with him.” Moreover, and reaffirmed in State v. Duhe, 12-2677 (La.
-
Floyd v. City of Carencro
149 So. 3d 387
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
I can’t see all their hands, and it’s just not safe for me. I’d much prefer having the subject standing outside the vehicle to where I can speak with him.” Moreover, and reaffirmed in State v. Duhe, 12-2677 (La.12/10/13), , the supreme court affirmed an officer’s reasonable request after a stop is initiated to order all of the occupants out of the vehicle in order to ensure the officer’s safety.
- State v. Butler 142 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
State v. Duhe
130 So. 3d 880
La. 2013
(police may order passengers to exit a car in a routine traffic stop for reasons of the officers’ safety); see also Maryland v. 9Wilson, 519 U.S. 408, 413 , 117 S.Ct.
-
State v. Lockett
120 So. 3d 886
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
882 , 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997)
-
State v. Lewis
121 So. 3d 128
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
App. 5 Cir. 12/29/09), ().
- State v. Jones 91 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-
State v. Fortune
72 So. 3d 1000
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
The United States Supreme Court explained this in Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323 , 129 S.Ct.
-
State v. Heard
70 So. 3d 811
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
330 , 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977); *818
-
State v. Cooper
55 So. 3d 873
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Benoit, 01-2712 (La.5/14/02)
- State v. Brown 30 So. 3d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Overruled State of Louisiana v. Kevin Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Overruled State v. Coleman 20 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. O'NEAL 7 So. 3d 182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
- State v. Cooper 2 So. 3d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
- State v. Stoutes 980 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
-
State v. Cox
963 So. 2d 1080
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
330 , 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977); and Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 , 117 S.Ct.
- State v. Thigpen 963 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
-
State v. Guillory
942 So. 2d 73
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
882, 886 , 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); -47 (La.1991).
-
State of Louisiana v. Deyon Romain Guillory
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
882, 886, 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); -47 (La.1991).
- State v. Knowles 917 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
-
State v. Sewell
912 So. 2d 719
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
330 , 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977), which authorizes getting the driver out of the car for officer safety, predicated upon the officer reasonably suspecting general danger; a Louisiana case authorizing the removal of guest passengers for officer safety, again only requiring a generalized reasonable suspicion of danger; and Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 , 117 S.Ct.
-
State v. White
903 So. 2d 580
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
330 , 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977); Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 , 117 S.Ct.
-
State v. Jackson
892 So. 2d 71
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
the Louisiana Supreme Court found that a police officer's request for identification from the passenger of a vehicle stopped for a traffic violation did not impermissibly infringe on his right to privacy.
-
State v. Cheatham
876 So. 2d 137
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
the court found that simply asking the passenger for identification after he had been removed from the vehicle was reasonable in light of the overall circumstances.
- State v. Dortch 878 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
-
State v. Cowart
862 So. 2d 225
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized there is potential danger for an officer even during a routine traffic stop: A police officer's stopping a vehicle for a routine traffic violation sets up the possibility of a significant confrontational situation.
-
State v. Fedison
807 So. 2d 834
La. 2002
882, 886 , 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); -47 (La.1991).
- State v. Shaw 736 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Drake 733 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
-
State v. Poland
715 So. 2d 688
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
882 , 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997)
-
State v. Purvis
684 So. 2d 567
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
is the applicable case law.
-
State v. Jackson
629 So. 2d 1374
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
In certain situations, police officers also have authority to order that passengers disembark from a vehicle while affairs are transacted with the driver.
-
State v. Jackson
629 So. 2d 1374
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
In certain situations, police officers also have authority to order that passengers disembark from a vehicle while affairs are transacted with the driver.
- State v. Sanchez 617 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
-
State v. Bradley
611 So. 2d 757
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
police stopped the driver of an automobile for a traffic violation early one morning.
-
State v. Mobley
592 So. 2d 1282
La. 1992
modified on other grounds, No. 90-K-0162.
-
State v. Johnson
591 So. 2d 803
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
the justification for ordering a passenger out of the vehicle is just as compelling as the justification for ordering the driver out.