Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Landry, 588 So. 2d 345.

42 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Jeremy Simmons La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
  • State v. Robinson 260 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    1978), overruled on other grounds , State v. Landry , (La.
  • State v. Castor 194 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    overruled on other grounds
  • State v. Lewis 187 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    882 , 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); State v. Cure, 11-2238 (La.7/2/12), ; State v. Hunt, 09-1589 (La.12/1/09)
  • Dominique Floyd v. City of Carenco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    I can’t see all their hands, and it’s just not safe for me. I’d much prefer having the subject standing outside the vehicle to where I can speak with him.” Moreover, and reaffirmed in State v. Duhe, 12-2677 (La.
  • Floyd v. City of Carencro 149 So. 3d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    I can’t see all their hands, and it’s just not safe for me. I’d much prefer having the subject standing outside the vehicle to where I can speak with him.” Moreover, and reaffirmed in State v. Duhe, 12-2677 (La.12/10/13), , the supreme court affirmed an officer’s reasonable request after a stop is initiated to order all of the occupants out of the vehicle in order to ensure the officer’s safety.
  • State v. Butler 142 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Duhe 130 So. 3d 880 La. 2013
    (police may order passengers to exit a car in a routine traffic stop for reasons of the officers’ safety); see also Maryland v. 9Wilson, 519 U.S. 408, 413 , 117 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lockett 120 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    882 , 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997)
  • State v. Lewis 121 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    App. 5 Cir. 12/29/09), ().
  • State v. Jones 91 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Fortune 72 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    The United States Supreme Court explained this in Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323 , 129 S.Ct.
  • State v. Heard 70 So. 3d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    330 , 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977); *818
  • State v. Cooper 55 So. 3d 873 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Benoit, 01-2712 (La.5/14/02)
  • State v. Brown 30 So. 3d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Overruled State of Louisiana v. Kevin Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Overruled State v. Coleman 20 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. O'NEAL 7 So. 3d 182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Cooper 2 So. 3d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Stoutes 980 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Cox 963 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    330 , 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977); and Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 , 117 S.Ct.
  • State v. Thigpen 963 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Guillory 942 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    882, 886 , 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); -47 (La.1991).
  • State of Louisiana v. Deyon Romain Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    882, 886, 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); -47 (La.1991).
  • State v. Knowles 917 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Sewell 912 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    330 , 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977), which authorizes getting the driver out of the car for officer safety, predicated upon the officer reasonably suspecting general danger; • a Louisiana case authorizing the removal of guest passengers for officer safety, again only requiring a generalized reasonable suspicion of danger; and • Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 , 117 S.Ct.
  • State v. White 903 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    330 , 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977); Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 , 117 S.Ct.
  • State v. Jackson 892 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    the Louisiana Supreme Court found that a police officer's request for identification from the passenger of a vehicle stopped for a traffic violation did not impermissibly infringe on his right to privacy.
  • State v. Cheatham 876 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    the court found that simply asking the passenger for identification after he had been removed from the vehicle was reasonable in light of the overall circumstances.
  • State v. Dortch 878 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Cowart 862 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized there is potential danger for an officer even during a routine traffic stop: A police officer's stopping a vehicle for a routine traffic violation sets up the possibility of a significant confrontational situation.
  • State v. Fedison 807 So. 2d 834 La. 2002
    882, 886 , 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); -47 (La.1991).
  • State v. Shaw 736 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Drake 733 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Poland 715 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    882 , 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997)
  • State v. Purvis 684 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    is the applicable case law.
  • State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    In certain situations, police officers also have authority to order that passengers disembark from a vehicle while affairs are transacted with the driver.
  • State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    In certain situations, police officers also have authority to order that passengers disembark from a vehicle while affairs are transacted with the driver.
  • State v. Sanchez 617 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Bradley 611 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    police stopped the driver of an automobile for a traffic violation early one morning.
  • State v. Mobley 592 So. 2d 1282 La. 1992
    modified on other grounds, No. 90-K-0162.
  • State v. Johnson 591 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    the justification for ordering a passenger out of the vehicle is just as compelling as the justification for ordering the driver out.